-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 284
Fix delete pool lead to panic #430
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: jichenjc The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
| lbID := clusterProviderStatus.Network.APIServerLoadBalancer.ID | ||
|
|
||
| for _, port := range []int{22, 6443} { | ||
| for _, port := range []int{6443} { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
When we create the listener and pool, we are doing like:
portList := []int{clusterProviderSpec.APIServerLoadBalancerPort}
portList = append(portList, clusterProviderSpec.APIServerLoadBalancerAdditionalPorts...)
for _, port := range portList {
lbPortObjectsName := fmt.Sprintf("%s-%d", loadBalancerName, port)There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Oh sorry, I thought I already fixed that somewhere.
So the solution is to remove the same list of ports that have been added before
1) seems we don't need port 22, have no idea why use here 2) when pool not exist, should check and ignore following actions
|
/lgtm |
1) seems we don't need port 22, have no idea why use here 2) when pool not exist, should check and ignore following actions
What this PR does / why we need it:
Which issue(s) this PR fixes (optional, in
fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged):Fixes #429
Special notes for your reviewer:
Release note: