Adding custom ingress rules for port 6443 fails with error

[snehala27]

/kind bug

What steps did you take and what happened:
Referring to the fixes done for custom rules here: #4304, created a cluster with custom IP CIDR instead of allowing traffic everywhere for port 6443
The cluster specification looks as follows:

apiVersion: infrastructure.cluster.x-k8s.io/v1beta2
kind: AWSCluster
metadata:
  name: test-cluster-1
spec:
  region: us-east-2
  sshKeyName: sshKeyTemp
  controlPlaneLoadBalancer:
    crossZoneLoadBalancing: false
    ingressRules:
    - cidrBlocks:
        - 192.168.12.22/24
      description: ingress-test-1
      fromPort: 6443
      protocol: tcp
      toPort: 6443
    scheme: internet-facing  

Error seen:

I0829 09:48:47.246237       1 logger.go:67] "Cluster infrastructure is not ready yet"
E0829 09:48:47.260597       1 controller.go:329] "Reconciler error" err=<
    failed to authorize security group "sg-0c2909d6cbbf67f60" ingress rules: [protocol=tcp/range=[179-179]/description=bgp (calico) protocol=4/range=[-1-65535]/description=IP-in-IP (calico) protocol=tcp/range=[6443-6443]/description=Kubernetes API protocol=tcp/range=[2379-2379]/description=etcd protocol=tcp/range=[2380-2380]/description=etcd peer protocol=tcp/range=[6443-6443]/description=ingress-test-1]: InvalidParameterValue: The same permission must not appear multiple times
        status code: 400, request id: c8e14459-3805-43fb-b107-e86acfa15355
 > controller="awscluster" controllerGroup="infrastructure.cluster.x-k8s.io" controllerKind="AWSCluster" AWSCluster="default/test-cluster-1" namespace="default" name="test-cluster-1" reconcileID="53f246d4-9e6f-429c-a947-0df410a05808"
I0829 09:48:47.260817       1 logger.go:67] "Cluster infrastructure is not ready yet"
I0829 09:48:47.262557       1 logger.go:67] "Reconciling AWSCluster" controller="awscluster" controllerGroup="infrastructure.cluster.x-k8s.io" controllerKind="AWSCluster" AWSCluster="default/test-cluster-1" namespace="default" name="test-cluster-1" reconcileID="1cec16c0-ccd1-438b-a682-82cf0cef3d7b" cluster="default/test-cluster-1"
I0829 09:48:48.794886       1 logger.go:67] "Reconciling subnets" controller="awscluster" controllerGroup="infrastructure.cluster.x-k8s.io" controllerKind="AWSCluster" AWSCluster="default/test-cluster-1" namespace="default" name="test-cluster-1" reconcileID="1cec16c0-ccd1-438b-a682-82cf0cef3d7b" cluster="default/test-cluster-1"
E0829 09:48:52.009281       1 logger.go:83] "failed to reconcile security groups" err=<
    failed to authorize security group "sg-0c2909d6cbbf67f60" ingress rules: [protocol=tcp/range=[179-179]/description=bgp (calico) protocol=4/range=[-1-65535]/description=IP-in-IP (calico) protocol=tcp/range=[6443-6443]/description=Kubernetes API protocol=tcp/range=[2379-2379]/description=etcd protocol=tcp/range=[2380-2380]/description=etcd peer protocol=tcp/range=[6443-6443]/description=ingress-test-1]: InvalidParameterValue: The same permission must not appear multiple times
        status code: 400, request id: 46861e8f-3b09-4972-b03c-56a141eba516
 > controller="awscluster" controllerGroup="infrastructure.cluster.x-k8s.io" controllerKind="AWSCluster" AWSCluster="default/test-cluster-1" namespace="default" name="test-cluster-1" reconcileID="1cec16c0-ccd1-438b-a682-82cf0cef3d7b" cluster="default/test-cluster-1"
I0829 09:48:52.061093       1 logger.go:67] "Cluster infrastructure is not ready yet"

What did you expect to happen:
The ingress rule for api-server-lb should be created for given IP for port 6443

Anything else you would like to add:
[Miscellaneous information that will assist in solving the issue.]

Environment:

• Cluster-api-provider-aws version: 2.2.1
• Kubernetes version: (use kubectl version):
• OS (e.g. from /etc/os-release): ubuntu

[Ankitasw]

/triage accepted
/priority important-soon

[k8s-triage-robot]

This issue is labeled with priority/important-soon but has not been updated in over 90 days, and should be re-triaged.
Important-soon issues must be staffed and worked on either currently, or very soon, ideally in time for the next release.

You can:

• Confirm that this issue is still relevant with /triage accepted (org members only)
• Deprioritize it with /priority important-longterm or /priority backlog
• Close this issue with /close

For more details on the triage process, see https://www.kubernetes.dev/docs/guide/issue-triage/

/remove-triage accepted

[k8s-triage-robot]

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all issues.

This bot triages un-triaged issues according to the following rules:

• After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
• After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
• After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the issue is closed

You can:

• Mark this issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale
• Close this issue with /close
• Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/lifecycle stale

[k8s-triage-robot]

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all issues.

This bot triages un-triaged issues according to the following rules:

• After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
• After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
• After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the issue is closed

You can:

• Mark this issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten
• Close this issue with /close
• Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/lifecycle rotten