Skip to content

Refactor/dispute resolver #1647

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Jul 25, 2024
Merged

Refactor/dispute resolver #1647

merged 7 commits into from
Jul 25, 2024

Conversation

tractorss
Copy link
Contributor

@tractorss tractorss commented Jul 8, 2024

  • updates Dispute resolver Aliases to be optional

  • updates dispute resolver template types

    • answer.description now mandatory
    • answer.id now saved as hex-string
    • category now mandatory
    • added version field
    • added arbitrableAddress, arbitrableChainId, arbitratorAddress, arbitratorChainId fields

PR-Codex overview

This PR updates various components in the Resolver feature, focusing on improving form validation, context handling, and component styling.

Detailed summary

  • Updated form validation logic for voting options
  • Refactored context handling for new dispute data
  • Improved component styling by removing unnecessary CSS
  • Added new fields and logic for dispute templates

✨ Ask PR-Codex anything about this PR by commenting with /codex {your question}

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced versioning to dispute templates for better tracking and management.
    • Enhanced dispute templates with required category descriptions and IDs.
    • Strengthened input validation for user voting options by requiring both title and description.
  • Refactor

    • Improved context handling for new disputes to handle undefined initial values.
    • Simplified the styling logic by removing the StyledLabel component.
    • Updated internal logic to convert answer IDs to hexadecimal representation.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jul 8, 2024

Walkthrough

The recent updates enhance the management of dispute contexts and refine input validation throughout the application. Significant changes include the restructuring of data types, stricter validation requirements for user inputs, and the removal of redundant styling components, all aimed at simplifying the user experience. These improvements collectively contribute to a more robust and user-friendly dispute resolution process.

Changes

Files Change Summary
web/src/context/NewDisputeContext.tsx Enhanced context handling and data structures; required fields made mandatory; updated dispute template construction.
web/src/pages/Resolver/index.tsx Removed unnecessary styled component, simplifying the styling logic.
web/src/pages/Resolver/NavigationButtons/NextButton.tsx Improved validation logic for user inputs in voting; updated criteria for alias validation.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant App
    participant NewDisputeContext
    participant DisputeTemplate

    User->>App: Access New Dispute
    App->>NewDisputeContext: Initialize context with default values
    NewDisputeContext->>DisputeTemplate: Construct dispute template
    NewDisputeContext->>App: Provide context data
    App->>User: Display dispute form
Loading

Poem

In the land of code where rabbits play,
The context molds in a wondrous way.
With validations tight and logic clear,
Disputes are handled without fear.
Simplified paths, a joyous sight,
Hopping through changes, all feels right! 🐰✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

netlify bot commented Jul 8, 2024

Deploy Preview for kleros-v2 ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit ca6a9f7
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/kleros-v2/deploys/66a0e6d58df9ad0008f3e540
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-1647--kleros-v2.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

Copy link

netlify bot commented Jul 8, 2024

Deploy Preview for kleros-v2-neo ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit ca6a9f7
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/kleros-v2-neo/deploys/66a0e6d56a83a0000870f52a
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-1647--kleros-v2-neo.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

Copy link

netlify bot commented Jul 8, 2024

Deploy Preview for kleros-v2-university ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit ca6a9f7
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/kleros-v2-university/deploys/66a0e6d58f27e700089c80c4
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-1647--kleros-v2-university.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 4c82235 and 94b577f.

Files selected for processing (5)
  • web/src/context/NewDisputeContext.tsx (5 hunks)
  • web/src/pages/Resolver/NavigationButtons/NextButton.tsx (1 hunks)
  • web/src/pages/Resolver/NavigationButtons/SubmitDisputeButton.tsx (1 hunks)
  • web/src/pages/Resolver/Parameters/NotablePersons/index.tsx (1 hunks)
  • web/src/pages/Resolver/Parameters/VotingOptions/OptionsFields.tsx (2 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • web/src/pages/Resolver/Parameters/NotablePersons/index.tsx
Additional context used
Biome
web/src/context/NewDisputeContext.tsx

[error] 139-139: Avoid the delete operator which can impact performance.

Unsafe fix: Use an undefined assignment instead.

(lint/performance/noDelete)

Additional comments not posted (9)
web/src/pages/Resolver/NavigationButtons/NextButton.tsx (2)

24-25: Validation logic for aliases looks good.

The updated logic correctly handles the validation for empty addresses and names and validates aliases.


32-32: Button disabling logic looks good.

The updated condition correctly disables the button if the category is not set when the URL path includes /resolver/category.

web/src/pages/Resolver/Parameters/VotingOptions/OptionsFields.tsx (2)

46-47: Default answer structure update looks good.

The default answer structure now correctly includes the description field.


72-72: Label update for option description looks good.

The label now correctly reflects that the option description is mandatory.

web/src/pages/Resolver/NavigationButtons/SubmitDisputeButton.tsx (1)

99-100: Validation logic for dispute template looks good.

The updated validation logic correctly ensures that both title and description fields are non-empty in each answer.

web/src/context/NewDisputeContext.tsx (4)

11-13: Type definition for Answer looks good.

The id and description fields are now correctly defined as mandatory.


Line range hint 31-40:
Type definition for IDisputeTemplate looks good.

The category and version fields are now correctly defined as mandatory.


68-74: Initial data structure update looks good.

The initial data structure now correctly includes the new required fields.


136-138: ID conversion to hex-string looks good.

The function correctly converts answer.id to a hex-string.

coderabbitai[bot]
coderabbitai bot previously approved these changes Jul 8, 2024
@kemuru kemuru self-requested a review July 9, 2024 10:24
kemuru
kemuru previously approved these changes Jul 9, 2024
@tractorss tractorss dismissed stale reviews from kemuru and coderabbitai[bot] via ee5e446 July 16, 2024 14:27
@tractorss tractorss marked this pull request as draft July 16, 2024 14:28
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 94b577f and ee5e446.

Files selected for processing (2)
  • web/src/context/NewDisputeContext.tsx (7 hunks)
  • web/src/pages/Resolver/index.tsx (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • web/src/pages/Resolver/index.tsx
Additional context used
Biome
web/src/context/NewDisputeContext.tsx

[error] 135-135: Avoid the delete operator which can impact performance.

Unsafe fix: Use an undefined assignment instead.

(lint/performance/noDelete)

Additional comments not posted (4)
web/src/context/NewDisputeContext.tsx (4)

Line range hint 11-74: Updated type definitions and initial data structure.

The changes to the Answer and IDisputeTemplate types, including making certain fields mandatory and adding new fields (version, arbitrableAddress, etc.), align with the PR objectives. The initial data structure initialDisputeData has been updated accordingly, which is good for maintaining consistency.


77-85: Context creation and usage are well implemented.

The creation of NewDisputeContext with an undefined initial value and the implementation of useNewDisputeContext are correctly done. This approach enhances error handling by throwing an error if the context is not found, which is a good practice.


Line range hint 85-109: Provider component implementation is robust.

The NewDisputeProvider component uses React hooks effectively to manage state and context values. The use of useCallback in resetDisputeData is a good practice to avoid unnecessary re-renders.


1-6: Verify the usage of new imports and constants.

The newly added imports and constants (DEFAULT_CHAIN, disputeResolverAddress, klerosCoreAddress) are crucial for the functionality of dispute resolution. Ensure these are used appropriately throughout the code.

Verification successful

Verified the usage of new imports and constants.

The constants DEFAULT_CHAIN, disputeResolverAddress, and klerosCoreAddress are used appropriately across various files in the codebase, supporting their intended functionality in dispute resolution.

  • DEFAULT_CHAIN is used to set default chain IDs.
  • disputeResolverAddress and klerosCoreAddress are used to reference specific contract addresses.
Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the usage of newly added constants and imports.
# Test: Search for usage of new constants and imports. Expect: Relevant usage in the code.
rg --type typescript -A 5 $'DEFAULT_CHAIN|disputeResolverAddress|klerosCoreAddress'

Length of output: 119


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the usage of newly added constants and imports.
# Test: Search for usage of new constants and imports. Expect: Relevant usage in the code.
rg --type ts -A 5 'DEFAULT_CHAIN|disputeResolverAddress|klerosCoreAddress'

Length of output: 30513

coderabbitai[bot]
coderabbitai bot previously approved these changes Jul 19, 2024
@tractorss tractorss marked this pull request as ready for review July 19, 2024 11:28
@tractorss tractorss requested a review from kemuru July 19, 2024 11:29
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between ee5e446 and c5f63ad.

Files selected for processing (2)
  • web/src/context/NewDisputeContext.tsx (6 hunks)
  • web/src/pages/Resolver/NavigationButtons/NextButton.tsx (1 hunks)
Additional context used
Biome
web/src/context/NewDisputeContext.tsx

[error] 135-135: Avoid the delete operator which can impact performance.

Unsafe fix: Use an undefined assignment instead.

(lint/performance/noDelete)

Additional comments not posted (9)
web/src/pages/Resolver/NavigationButtons/NextButton.tsx (2)

20-21: Enhanced validation for voting options.

The added check for the description property in the answers array enhances the validation criteria, ensuring that both title and description are filled in for each answer.


24-25: Improved validation for filled addresses.

The updated logic allows an alias to be considered valid if both address and name are empty, introducing flexibility in alias validation.

web/src/context/NewDisputeContext.tsx (7)

1-1: Added useCallback import from React.

The addition of useCallback is appropriate for optimizing performance by memoizing callback functions.


5-6: Imported constants for default values and addresses.

The imports of DEFAULT_CHAIN, disputeResolverAddress, and klerosCoreAddress are appropriate for setting default values and addresses in the dispute resolution context.


11-13: Updated Answer type to require id and description.

Making id and description required in the Answer type ensures data integrity by guaranteeing that these fields are always provided.


40-40: Enhanced IDisputeTemplate interface.

Adding a version field and making category required in the IDisputeTemplate interface ensures that essential information is always available and enhances the structure of the template.


68-74: Updated initial data structure.

Including category, aliasesArray, and version in the initialDisputeData ensures that the initial state is comprehensive and aligns with the updated interface.


77-85: Improved context initialization and hook.

Allowing an undefined initial value and handling cases where the context is not found ensures robustness and prevents potential runtime errors.


94-96: Refactored resetDisputeData with useCallback.

Using useCallback for resetDisputeData optimizes performance by memoizing the function.

@jaybuidl jaybuidl self-requested a review July 24, 2024 10:33
Copy link
Member

@jaybuidl jaybuidl left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Let's remove:

  • numberOfJurors
  • arbitrationCost
  • arbitrableAddress

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (1)
web/src/context/NewDisputeContext.tsx (1)

Line range hint 116-140:
Changes to constructDisputeTemplate look good, but consider optimizing.

The changes align with the PR objectives. However, using the delete operator can impact performance. Consider using an undefined assignment instead.

-  if (!isUndefined(baseTemplate.policyURI) && baseTemplate.policyURI === "") delete baseTemplate.policyURI;
+  if (!isUndefined(baseTemplate.policyURI) && baseTemplate.policyURI === "") baseTemplate.policyURI = undefined;
Tools
Biome

[error] 136-136: Avoid the delete operator which can impact performance.

Unsafe fix: Use an undefined assignment instead.

(lint/performance/noDelete)

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between c5f63ad and bedfc49.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • web/src/context/NewDisputeContext.tsx (6 hunks)
Additional context used
Biome
web/src/context/NewDisputeContext.tsx

[error] 136-136: Avoid the delete operator which can impact performance.

Unsafe fix: Use an undefined assignment instead.

(lint/performance/noDelete)

Additional comments not posted (6)
web/src/context/NewDisputeContext.tsx (6)

1-6: Imports look good.

The new imports are necessary for the added functionality.


11-13: Type definition changes look good.

The changes align with the PR objectives to make answer.description and category mandatory and add a version field.

Also applies to: 40-40


68-74: Initial data structure changes look good.

The changes align with the PR objectives to include category, aliasesArray, and version in the dispute template.


77-77: Context initialization changes look good.

The changes align with the previous review comments and improve the context handling.


79-85: Changes to useNewDisputeContext look good.

The changes improve error handling and align with best practices.


94-96: Changes to resetDisputeData look good.

The changes optimize the function by memoizing it with useCallback.

@jaybuidl jaybuidl enabled auto-merge July 24, 2024 11:34
Copy link

Code Climate has analyzed commit ca6a9f7 and detected 3 issues on this pull request.

Here's the issue category breakdown:

Category Count
Duplication 3

View more on Code Climate.

Copy link

@jaybuidl jaybuidl added this pull request to the merge queue Jul 25, 2024
Merged via the queue into dev with commit 56fbe69 Jul 25, 2024
20 of 22 checks passed
@jaybuidl jaybuidl deleted the refactor/dispute-resolver branch October 8, 2024 16:17
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants