bpf: Support multi-attach for freplace programs #47
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Master branch: 2bab48c patch https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/netdev/patch/[email protected]/ applied successfully |
|
Master branch: 2bab48c patch https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/netdev/patch/[email protected]/ applied successfully |
kernel-patches-bot
force-pushed
the
series/189431
branch
from
7153a21 to
218bd37
Compare
|
Master branch: 2bab48c patch https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/netdev/patch/[email protected]/ applied successfully |
kernel-patches-bot
force-pushed
the
series/189431
branch
from
218bd37 to
95affa6
Compare
|
Master branch: 2bab48c patch https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/netdev/patch/[email protected]/ applied successfully |
kernel-patches-bot
force-pushed
the
series/189431
branch
from
95affa6 to
bbff7df
Compare
kernel-patches-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 14, 2020
[ 6525.735488] Unexpected kernel BRK exception at EL1 [ 6525.735502] Internal error: ptrace BRK handler: f2000100 [#1] SMP [ 6525.741609] Modules linked in: nls_utf8 cifs libdes libarc4 dns_resolver fscache binfmt_misc nls_ascii nls_cp437 vfat fat aes_ce_blk crypto_simd cryptd aes_ce_cipher ghash_ce gf128mul efi_pstore sha2_ce sha256_arm64 sha1_ce evdev efivars efivarfs ip_tables x_tables autofs4 btrfs blake2b_generic xor xor_neon zstd_compress raid6_pq libcrc32c crc32c_generic ahci xhci_pci libahci xhci_hcd igb libata i2c_algo_bit nvme realtek usbcore nvme_core scsi_mod t10_pi netsec mdio_devres of_mdio gpio_keys fixed_phy libphy gpio_mb86s7x [ 6525.787760] CPU: 3 PID: 7881 Comm: test_verifier Tainted: G W 5.9.0-rc1+ #47 [ 6525.796111] Hardware name: Socionext SynQuacer E-series DeveloperBox, BIOS build #1 Jun 6 2020 [ 6525.804812] pstate: 20000005 (nzCv daif -PAN -UAO BTYPE=--) [ 6525.810390] pc : bpf_prog_c3d01833289b6311_F+0xc8/0x9f4 [ 6525.815613] lr : bpf_prog_d53bb52e3f4483f9_F+0x38/0xc8c [ 6525.820832] sp : ffff8000130cbb80 [ 6525.824141] x29: ffff8000130cbbb0 x28: 0000000000000000 [ 6525.829451] x27: 000005ef6fcbf39b x26: 0000000000000000 [ 6525.834759] x25: ffff8000130cbb80 x24: ffff800011dc7038 [ 6525.840067] x23: ffff8000130cbd00 x22: ffff0008f624d080 [ 6525.845375] x21: 0000000000000001 x20: ffff800011dc7000 [ 6525.850682] x19: 0000000000000000 x18: 0000000000000000 [ 6525.855990] x17: 0000000000000000 x16: 0000000000000000 [ 6525.861298] x15: 0000000000000000 x14: 0000000000000000 [ 6525.866606] x13: 0000000000000000 x12: 0000000000000000 [ 6525.871913] x11: 0000000000000001 x10: ffff8000000a660c [ 6525.877220] x9 : ffff800010951810 x8 : ffff8000130cbc38 [ 6525.882528] x7 : 0000000000000000 x6 : 0000009864cfa881 [ 6525.887836] x5 : 00ffffffffffffff x4 : 002880ba1a0b3e9f [ 6525.893144] x3 : 0000000000000018 x2 : ffff8000000a4374 [ 6525.898452] x1 : 000000000000000a x0 : 0000000000000009 [ 6525.903760] Call trace: [ 6525.906202] bpf_prog_c3d01833289b6311_F+0xc8/0x9f4 [ 6525.911076] bpf_prog_d53bb52e3f4483f9_F+0x38/0xc8c [ 6525.915957] bpf_dispatcher_xdp_func+0x14/0x20 [ 6525.920398] bpf_test_run+0x70/0x1b0 [ 6525.923969] bpf_prog_test_run_xdp+0xec/0x190 [ 6525.928326] __do_sys_bpf+0xc88/0x1b28 [ 6525.932072] __arm64_sys_bpf+0x24/0x30 [ 6525.935820] el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0x70/0x168 [ 6525.940607] do_el0_svc+0x28/0x88 [ 6525.943920] el0_sync_handler+0x88/0x190 [ 6525.947838] el0_sync+0x140/0x180 [ 6525.951154] Code: d4202000 d4202000 d4202000 d4202000 (d4202000) [ 6525.957249] ---[ end trace cecc3f93b14927e2 ]--- The reason is the offset[] creation and later usage while building the eBPF body. The code currently omits the first instruction, since build_insn() will increase our ctx->idx before saving it. That was fine up until bounded eBPF loops were introduced. After that introduction, offset[0] must be the offset of the end of prologue which is the start of the 1st insn while, offset[n] holds the offset of the end of n-th insn. When "taken loop with back jump to 1st insn" test runs, it will eventually call bpf2a64_offset(-1, 2, ctx). Since negative indexing is permitted, the current outcome depends on the value stored in ctx->offset[-1], which has nothing to do with our array. If the value happens to be 0 the tests will work. If not this error triggers. 7c2e988 ("bpf: fix x64 JIT code generation for jmp to 1st insn") fixed an indentical bug on x86 when eBPF bounded loops were introduced. So let's fix it by creating the ctx->offset[] correctly in the first place and account for the first instruction while calculating the arm instruction offsets. Fixes: 2589726 ("bpf: introduce bounded loops") Reported-by: Naresh Kamboju <[email protected]> Reported-by: Jiri Olsa <[email protected]> Co-developed-by: Jean-Philippe Brucker <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Jean-Philippe Brucker <[email protected]> Co-developed-by: Yauheni Kaliuta <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Yauheni Kaliuta <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Ilias Apalodimas <[email protected]> --- Changes since v1: - Added Co-developed-by, Reported-by and Fixes tags correctly - Describe the expected context of ctx->offset[] in comments arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
kernel-patches-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 14, 2020
[ 6525.735488] Unexpected kernel BRK exception at EL1 [ 6525.735502] Internal error: ptrace BRK handler: f2000100 [#1] SMP [ 6525.741609] Modules linked in: nls_utf8 cifs libdes libarc4 dns_resolver fscache binfmt_misc nls_ascii nls_cp437 vfat fat aes_ce_blk crypto_simd cryptd aes_ce_cipher ghash_ce gf128mul efi_pstore sha2_ce sha256_arm64 sha1_ce evdev efivars efivarfs ip_tables x_tables autofs4 btrfs blake2b_generic xor xor_neon zstd_compress raid6_pq libcrc32c crc32c_generic ahci xhci_pci libahci xhci_hcd igb libata i2c_algo_bit nvme realtek usbcore nvme_core scsi_mod t10_pi netsec mdio_devres of_mdio gpio_keys fixed_phy libphy gpio_mb86s7x [ 6525.787760] CPU: 3 PID: 7881 Comm: test_verifier Tainted: G W 5.9.0-rc1+ #47 [ 6525.796111] Hardware name: Socionext SynQuacer E-series DeveloperBox, BIOS build #1 Jun 6 2020 [ 6525.804812] pstate: 20000005 (nzCv daif -PAN -UAO BTYPE=--) [ 6525.810390] pc : bpf_prog_c3d01833289b6311_F+0xc8/0x9f4 [ 6525.815613] lr : bpf_prog_d53bb52e3f4483f9_F+0x38/0xc8c [ 6525.820832] sp : ffff8000130cbb80 [ 6525.824141] x29: ffff8000130cbbb0 x28: 0000000000000000 [ 6525.829451] x27: 000005ef6fcbf39b x26: 0000000000000000 [ 6525.834759] x25: ffff8000130cbb80 x24: ffff800011dc7038 [ 6525.840067] x23: ffff8000130cbd00 x22: ffff0008f624d080 [ 6525.845375] x21: 0000000000000001 x20: ffff800011dc7000 [ 6525.850682] x19: 0000000000000000 x18: 0000000000000000 [ 6525.855990] x17: 0000000000000000 x16: 0000000000000000 [ 6525.861298] x15: 0000000000000000 x14: 0000000000000000 [ 6525.866606] x13: 0000000000000000 x12: 0000000000000000 [ 6525.871913] x11: 0000000000000001 x10: ffff8000000a660c [ 6525.877220] x9 : ffff800010951810 x8 : ffff8000130cbc38 [ 6525.882528] x7 : 0000000000000000 x6 : 0000009864cfa881 [ 6525.887836] x5 : 00ffffffffffffff x4 : 002880ba1a0b3e9f [ 6525.893144] x3 : 0000000000000018 x2 : ffff8000000a4374 [ 6525.898452] x1 : 000000000000000a x0 : 0000000000000009 [ 6525.903760] Call trace: [ 6525.906202] bpf_prog_c3d01833289b6311_F+0xc8/0x9f4 [ 6525.911076] bpf_prog_d53bb52e3f4483f9_F+0x38/0xc8c [ 6525.915957] bpf_dispatcher_xdp_func+0x14/0x20 [ 6525.920398] bpf_test_run+0x70/0x1b0 [ 6525.923969] bpf_prog_test_run_xdp+0xec/0x190 [ 6525.928326] __do_sys_bpf+0xc88/0x1b28 [ 6525.932072] __arm64_sys_bpf+0x24/0x30 [ 6525.935820] el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0x70/0x168 [ 6525.940607] do_el0_svc+0x28/0x88 [ 6525.943920] el0_sync_handler+0x88/0x190 [ 6525.947838] el0_sync+0x140/0x180 [ 6525.951154] Code: d4202000 d4202000 d4202000 d4202000 (d4202000) [ 6525.957249] ---[ end trace cecc3f93b14927e2 ]--- The reason is the offset[] creation and later usage while building the eBPF body. The code currently omits the first instruction, since build_insn() will increase our ctx->idx before saving it. That was fine up until bounded eBPF loops were introduced. After that introduction, offset[0] must be the offset of the end of prologue which is the start of the 1st insn while, offset[n] holds the offset of the end of n-th insn. When "taken loop with back jump to 1st insn" test runs, it will eventually call bpf2a64_offset(-1, 2, ctx). Since negative indexing is permitted, the current outcome depends on the value stored in ctx->offset[-1], which has nothing to do with our array. If the value happens to be 0 the tests will work. If not this error triggers. 7c2e988 ("bpf: fix x64 JIT code generation for jmp to 1st insn") fixed an indentical bug on x86 when eBPF bounded loops were introduced. So let's fix it by creating the ctx->offset[] correctly in the first place and account for the first instruction while calculating the arm instruction offsets. Fixes: 2589726 ("bpf: introduce bounded loops") Reported-by: Naresh Kamboju <[email protected]> Reported-by: Jiri Olsa <[email protected]> Co-developed-by: Jean-Philippe Brucker <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Jean-Philippe Brucker <[email protected]> Co-developed-by: Yauheni Kaliuta <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Yauheni Kaliuta <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Ilias Apalodimas <[email protected]> --- Changes since v1: - Added Co-developed-by, Reported-by and Fixes tags correctly - Describe the expected context of ctx->offset[] in comments arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
kernel-patches-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 14, 2020
[ 6525.735488] Unexpected kernel BRK exception at EL1 [ 6525.735502] Internal error: ptrace BRK handler: f2000100 [#1] SMP [ 6525.741609] Modules linked in: nls_utf8 cifs libdes libarc4 dns_resolver fscache binfmt_misc nls_ascii nls_cp437 vfat fat aes_ce_blk crypto_simd cryptd aes_ce_cipher ghash_ce gf128mul efi_pstore sha2_ce sha256_arm64 sha1_ce evdev efivars efivarfs ip_tables x_tables autofs4 btrfs blake2b_generic xor xor_neon zstd_compress raid6_pq libcrc32c crc32c_generic ahci xhci_pci libahci xhci_hcd igb libata i2c_algo_bit nvme realtek usbcore nvme_core scsi_mod t10_pi netsec mdio_devres of_mdio gpio_keys fixed_phy libphy gpio_mb86s7x [ 6525.787760] CPU: 3 PID: 7881 Comm: test_verifier Tainted: G W 5.9.0-rc1+ #47 [ 6525.796111] Hardware name: Socionext SynQuacer E-series DeveloperBox, BIOS build #1 Jun 6 2020 [ 6525.804812] pstate: 20000005 (nzCv daif -PAN -UAO BTYPE=--) [ 6525.810390] pc : bpf_prog_c3d01833289b6311_F+0xc8/0x9f4 [ 6525.815613] lr : bpf_prog_d53bb52e3f4483f9_F+0x38/0xc8c [ 6525.820832] sp : ffff8000130cbb80 [ 6525.824141] x29: ffff8000130cbbb0 x28: 0000000000000000 [ 6525.829451] x27: 000005ef6fcbf39b x26: 0000000000000000 [ 6525.834759] x25: ffff8000130cbb80 x24: ffff800011dc7038 [ 6525.840067] x23: ffff8000130cbd00 x22: ffff0008f624d080 [ 6525.845375] x21: 0000000000000001 x20: ffff800011dc7000 [ 6525.850682] x19: 0000000000000000 x18: 0000000000000000 [ 6525.855990] x17: 0000000000000000 x16: 0000000000000000 [ 6525.861298] x15: 0000000000000000 x14: 0000000000000000 [ 6525.866606] x13: 0000000000000000 x12: 0000000000000000 [ 6525.871913] x11: 0000000000000001 x10: ffff8000000a660c [ 6525.877220] x9 : ffff800010951810 x8 : ffff8000130cbc38 [ 6525.882528] x7 : 0000000000000000 x6 : 0000009864cfa881 [ 6525.887836] x5 : 00ffffffffffffff x4 : 002880ba1a0b3e9f [ 6525.893144] x3 : 0000000000000018 x2 : ffff8000000a4374 [ 6525.898452] x1 : 000000000000000a x0 : 0000000000000009 [ 6525.903760] Call trace: [ 6525.906202] bpf_prog_c3d01833289b6311_F+0xc8/0x9f4 [ 6525.911076] bpf_prog_d53bb52e3f4483f9_F+0x38/0xc8c [ 6525.915957] bpf_dispatcher_xdp_func+0x14/0x20 [ 6525.920398] bpf_test_run+0x70/0x1b0 [ 6525.923969] bpf_prog_test_run_xdp+0xec/0x190 [ 6525.928326] __do_sys_bpf+0xc88/0x1b28 [ 6525.932072] __arm64_sys_bpf+0x24/0x30 [ 6525.935820] el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0x70/0x168 [ 6525.940607] do_el0_svc+0x28/0x88 [ 6525.943920] el0_sync_handler+0x88/0x190 [ 6525.947838] el0_sync+0x140/0x180 [ 6525.951154] Code: d4202000 d4202000 d4202000 d4202000 (d4202000) [ 6525.957249] ---[ end trace cecc3f93b14927e2 ]--- The reason is the offset[] creation and later usage while building the eBPF body. The code currently omits the first instruction, since build_insn() will increase our ctx->idx before saving it. That was fine up until bounded eBPF loops were introduced. After that introduction, offset[0] must be the offset of the end of prologue which is the start of the 1st insn while, offset[n] holds the offset of the end of n-th insn. When "taken loop with back jump to 1st insn" test runs, it will eventually call bpf2a64_offset(-1, 2, ctx). Since negative indexing is permitted, the current outcome depends on the value stored in ctx->offset[-1], which has nothing to do with our array. If the value happens to be 0 the tests will work. If not this error triggers. 7c2e988 ("bpf: fix x64 JIT code generation for jmp to 1st insn") fixed an indentical bug on x86 when eBPF bounded loops were introduced. So let's fix it by creating the ctx->offset[] correctly in the first place and account for the first instruction while calculating the arm instruction offsets. Fixes: 2589726 ("bpf: introduce bounded loops") Reported-by: Naresh Kamboju <[email protected]> Reported-by: Jiri Olsa <[email protected]> Co-developed-by: Jean-Philippe Brucker <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Jean-Philippe Brucker <[email protected]> Co-developed-by: Yauheni Kaliuta <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Yauheni Kaliuta <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Ilias Apalodimas <[email protected]> --- Changes since v1: - Added Co-developed-by, Reported-by and Fixes tags correctly - Describe the expected context of ctx->offset[] in comments arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
kernel-patches-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 14, 2020
[ 6525.735488] Unexpected kernel BRK exception at EL1 [ 6525.735502] Internal error: ptrace BRK handler: f2000100 [#1] SMP [ 6525.741609] Modules linked in: nls_utf8 cifs libdes libarc4 dns_resolver fscache binfmt_misc nls_ascii nls_cp437 vfat fat aes_ce_blk crypto_simd cryptd aes_ce_cipher ghash_ce gf128mul efi_pstore sha2_ce sha256_arm64 sha1_ce evdev efivars efivarfs ip_tables x_tables autofs4 btrfs blake2b_generic xor xor_neon zstd_compress raid6_pq libcrc32c crc32c_generic ahci xhci_pci libahci xhci_hcd igb libata i2c_algo_bit nvme realtek usbcore nvme_core scsi_mod t10_pi netsec mdio_devres of_mdio gpio_keys fixed_phy libphy gpio_mb86s7x [ 6525.787760] CPU: 3 PID: 7881 Comm: test_verifier Tainted: G W 5.9.0-rc1+ #47 [ 6525.796111] Hardware name: Socionext SynQuacer E-series DeveloperBox, BIOS build #1 Jun 6 2020 [ 6525.804812] pstate: 20000005 (nzCv daif -PAN -UAO BTYPE=--) [ 6525.810390] pc : bpf_prog_c3d01833289b6311_F+0xc8/0x9f4 [ 6525.815613] lr : bpf_prog_d53bb52e3f4483f9_F+0x38/0xc8c [ 6525.820832] sp : ffff8000130cbb80 [ 6525.824141] x29: ffff8000130cbbb0 x28: 0000000000000000 [ 6525.829451] x27: 000005ef6fcbf39b x26: 0000000000000000 [ 6525.834759] x25: ffff8000130cbb80 x24: ffff800011dc7038 [ 6525.840067] x23: ffff8000130cbd00 x22: ffff0008f624d080 [ 6525.845375] x21: 0000000000000001 x20: ffff800011dc7000 [ 6525.850682] x19: 0000000000000000 x18: 0000000000000000 [ 6525.855990] x17: 0000000000000000 x16: 0000000000000000 [ 6525.861298] x15: 0000000000000000 x14: 0000000000000000 [ 6525.866606] x13: 0000000000000000 x12: 0000000000000000 [ 6525.871913] x11: 0000000000000001 x10: ffff8000000a660c [ 6525.877220] x9 : ffff800010951810 x8 : ffff8000130cbc38 [ 6525.882528] x7 : 0000000000000000 x6 : 0000009864cfa881 [ 6525.887836] x5 : 00ffffffffffffff x4 : 002880ba1a0b3e9f [ 6525.893144] x3 : 0000000000000018 x2 : ffff8000000a4374 [ 6525.898452] x1 : 000000000000000a x0 : 0000000000000009 [ 6525.903760] Call trace: [ 6525.906202] bpf_prog_c3d01833289b6311_F+0xc8/0x9f4 [ 6525.911076] bpf_prog_d53bb52e3f4483f9_F+0x38/0xc8c [ 6525.915957] bpf_dispatcher_xdp_func+0x14/0x20 [ 6525.920398] bpf_test_run+0x70/0x1b0 [ 6525.923969] bpf_prog_test_run_xdp+0xec/0x190 [ 6525.928326] __do_sys_bpf+0xc88/0x1b28 [ 6525.932072] __arm64_sys_bpf+0x24/0x30 [ 6525.935820] el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0x70/0x168 [ 6525.940607] do_el0_svc+0x28/0x88 [ 6525.943920] el0_sync_handler+0x88/0x190 [ 6525.947838] el0_sync+0x140/0x180 [ 6525.951154] Code: d4202000 d4202000 d4202000 d4202000 (d4202000) [ 6525.957249] ---[ end trace cecc3f93b14927e2 ]--- The reason is the offset[] creation and later usage while building the eBPF body. The code currently omits the first instruction, since build_insn() will increase our ctx->idx before saving it. That was fine up until bounded eBPF loops were introduced. After that introduction, offset[0] must be the offset of the end of prologue which is the start of the 1st insn while, offset[n] holds the offset of the end of n-th insn. When "taken loop with back jump to 1st insn" test runs, it will eventually call bpf2a64_offset(-1, 2, ctx). Since negative indexing is permitted, the current outcome depends on the value stored in ctx->offset[-1], which has nothing to do with our array. If the value happens to be 0 the tests will work. If not this error triggers. 7c2e988 ("bpf: fix x64 JIT code generation for jmp to 1st insn") fixed an indentical bug on x86 when eBPF bounded loops were introduced. So let's fix it by creating the ctx->offset[] correctly in the first place and account for the first instruction while calculating the arm instruction offsets. Fixes: 2589726 ("bpf: introduce bounded loops") Reported-by: Naresh Kamboju <[email protected]> Reported-by: Jiri Olsa <[email protected]> Co-developed-by: Jean-Philippe Brucker <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Jean-Philippe Brucker <[email protected]> Co-developed-by: Yauheni Kaliuta <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Yauheni Kaliuta <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Ilias Apalodimas <[email protected]> --- Changes since v1: - Added Co-developed-by, Reported-by and Fixes tags correctly - Describe the expected context of ctx->offset[] in comments arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
kernel-patches-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 14, 2020
[ 6525.735488] Unexpected kernel BRK exception at EL1 [ 6525.735502] Internal error: ptrace BRK handler: f2000100 [#1] SMP [ 6525.741609] Modules linked in: nls_utf8 cifs libdes libarc4 dns_resolver fscache binfmt_misc nls_ascii nls_cp437 vfat fat aes_ce_blk crypto_simd cryptd aes_ce_cipher ghash_ce gf128mul efi_pstore sha2_ce sha256_arm64 sha1_ce evdev efivars efivarfs ip_tables x_tables autofs4 btrfs blake2b_generic xor xor_neon zstd_compress raid6_pq libcrc32c crc32c_generic ahci xhci_pci libahci xhci_hcd igb libata i2c_algo_bit nvme realtek usbcore nvme_core scsi_mod t10_pi netsec mdio_devres of_mdio gpio_keys fixed_phy libphy gpio_mb86s7x [ 6525.787760] CPU: 3 PID: 7881 Comm: test_verifier Tainted: G W 5.9.0-rc1+ #47 [ 6525.796111] Hardware name: Socionext SynQuacer E-series DeveloperBox, BIOS build #1 Jun 6 2020 [ 6525.804812] pstate: 20000005 (nzCv daif -PAN -UAO BTYPE=--) [ 6525.810390] pc : bpf_prog_c3d01833289b6311_F+0xc8/0x9f4 [ 6525.815613] lr : bpf_prog_d53bb52e3f4483f9_F+0x38/0xc8c [ 6525.820832] sp : ffff8000130cbb80 [ 6525.824141] x29: ffff8000130cbbb0 x28: 0000000000000000 [ 6525.829451] x27: 000005ef6fcbf39b x26: 0000000000000000 [ 6525.834759] x25: ffff8000130cbb80 x24: ffff800011dc7038 [ 6525.840067] x23: ffff8000130cbd00 x22: ffff0008f624d080 [ 6525.845375] x21: 0000000000000001 x20: ffff800011dc7000 [ 6525.850682] x19: 0000000000000000 x18: 0000000000000000 [ 6525.855990] x17: 0000000000000000 x16: 0000000000000000 [ 6525.861298] x15: 0000000000000000 x14: 0000000000000000 [ 6525.866606] x13: 0000000000000000 x12: 0000000000000000 [ 6525.871913] x11: 0000000000000001 x10: ffff8000000a660c [ 6525.877220] x9 : ffff800010951810 x8 : ffff8000130cbc38 [ 6525.882528] x7 : 0000000000000000 x6 : 0000009864cfa881 [ 6525.887836] x5 : 00ffffffffffffff x4 : 002880ba1a0b3e9f [ 6525.893144] x3 : 0000000000000018 x2 : ffff8000000a4374 [ 6525.898452] x1 : 000000000000000a x0 : 0000000000000009 [ 6525.903760] Call trace: [ 6525.906202] bpf_prog_c3d01833289b6311_F+0xc8/0x9f4 [ 6525.911076] bpf_prog_d53bb52e3f4483f9_F+0x38/0xc8c [ 6525.915957] bpf_dispatcher_xdp_func+0x14/0x20 [ 6525.920398] bpf_test_run+0x70/0x1b0 [ 6525.923969] bpf_prog_test_run_xdp+0xec/0x190 [ 6525.928326] __do_sys_bpf+0xc88/0x1b28 [ 6525.932072] __arm64_sys_bpf+0x24/0x30 [ 6525.935820] el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0x70/0x168 [ 6525.940607] do_el0_svc+0x28/0x88 [ 6525.943920] el0_sync_handler+0x88/0x190 [ 6525.947838] el0_sync+0x140/0x180 [ 6525.951154] Code: d4202000 d4202000 d4202000 d4202000 (d4202000) [ 6525.957249] ---[ end trace cecc3f93b14927e2 ]--- The reason is the offset[] creation and later usage while building the eBPF body. The code currently omits the first instruction, since build_insn() will increase our ctx->idx before saving it. That was fine up until bounded eBPF loops were introduced. After that introduction, offset[0] must be the offset of the end of prologue which is the start of the 1st insn while, offset[n] holds the offset of the end of n-th insn. When "taken loop with back jump to 1st insn" test runs, it will eventually call bpf2a64_offset(-1, 2, ctx). Since negative indexing is permitted, the current outcome depends on the value stored in ctx->offset[-1], which has nothing to do with our array. If the value happens to be 0 the tests will work. If not this error triggers. 7c2e988 ("bpf: fix x64 JIT code generation for jmp to 1st insn") fixed an indentical bug on x86 when eBPF bounded loops were introduced. So let's fix it by creating the ctx->offset[] correctly in the first place and account for the first instruction while calculating the arm instruction offsets. Fixes: 2589726 ("bpf: introduce bounded loops") Reported-by: Naresh Kamboju <[email protected]> Reported-by: Jiri Olsa <[email protected]> Co-developed-by: Jean-Philippe Brucker <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Jean-Philippe Brucker <[email protected]> Co-developed-by: Yauheni Kaliuta <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Yauheni Kaliuta <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Ilias Apalodimas <[email protected]> --- Changes since v1: - Added Co-developed-by, Reported-by and Fixes tags correctly - Describe the expected context of ctx->offset[] in comments arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
kernel-patches-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 14, 2020
[ 6525.735488] Unexpected kernel BRK exception at EL1 [ 6525.735502] Internal error: ptrace BRK handler: f2000100 [#1] SMP [ 6525.741609] Modules linked in: nls_utf8 cifs libdes libarc4 dns_resolver fscache binfmt_misc nls_ascii nls_cp437 vfat fat aes_ce_blk crypto_simd cryptd aes_ce_cipher ghash_ce gf128mul efi_pstore sha2_ce sha256_arm64 sha1_ce evdev efivars efivarfs ip_tables x_tables autofs4 btrfs blake2b_generic xor xor_neon zstd_compress raid6_pq libcrc32c crc32c_generic ahci xhci_pci libahci xhci_hcd igb libata i2c_algo_bit nvme realtek usbcore nvme_core scsi_mod t10_pi netsec mdio_devres of_mdio gpio_keys fixed_phy libphy gpio_mb86s7x [ 6525.787760] CPU: 3 PID: 7881 Comm: test_verifier Tainted: G W 5.9.0-rc1+ #47 [ 6525.796111] Hardware name: Socionext SynQuacer E-series DeveloperBox, BIOS build #1 Jun 6 2020 [ 6525.804812] pstate: 20000005 (nzCv daif -PAN -UAO BTYPE=--) [ 6525.810390] pc : bpf_prog_c3d01833289b6311_F+0xc8/0x9f4 [ 6525.815613] lr : bpf_prog_d53bb52e3f4483f9_F+0x38/0xc8c [ 6525.820832] sp : ffff8000130cbb80 [ 6525.824141] x29: ffff8000130cbbb0 x28: 0000000000000000 [ 6525.829451] x27: 000005ef6fcbf39b x26: 0000000000000000 [ 6525.834759] x25: ffff8000130cbb80 x24: ffff800011dc7038 [ 6525.840067] x23: ffff8000130cbd00 x22: ffff0008f624d080 [ 6525.845375] x21: 0000000000000001 x20: ffff800011dc7000 [ 6525.850682] x19: 0000000000000000 x18: 0000000000000000 [ 6525.855990] x17: 0000000000000000 x16: 0000000000000000 [ 6525.861298] x15: 0000000000000000 x14: 0000000000000000 [ 6525.866606] x13: 0000000000000000 x12: 0000000000000000 [ 6525.871913] x11: 0000000000000001 x10: ffff8000000a660c [ 6525.877220] x9 : ffff800010951810 x8 : ffff8000130cbc38 [ 6525.882528] x7 : 0000000000000000 x6 : 0000009864cfa881 [ 6525.887836] x5 : 00ffffffffffffff x4 : 002880ba1a0b3e9f [ 6525.893144] x3 : 0000000000000018 x2 : ffff8000000a4374 [ 6525.898452] x1 : 000000000000000a x0 : 0000000000000009 [ 6525.903760] Call trace: [ 6525.906202] bpf_prog_c3d01833289b6311_F+0xc8/0x9f4 [ 6525.911076] bpf_prog_d53bb52e3f4483f9_F+0x38/0xc8c [ 6525.915957] bpf_dispatcher_xdp_func+0x14/0x20 [ 6525.920398] bpf_test_run+0x70/0x1b0 [ 6525.923969] bpf_prog_test_run_xdp+0xec/0x190 [ 6525.928326] __do_sys_bpf+0xc88/0x1b28 [ 6525.932072] __arm64_sys_bpf+0x24/0x30 [ 6525.935820] el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0x70/0x168 [ 6525.940607] do_el0_svc+0x28/0x88 [ 6525.943920] el0_sync_handler+0x88/0x190 [ 6525.947838] el0_sync+0x140/0x180 [ 6525.951154] Code: d4202000 d4202000 d4202000 d4202000 (d4202000) [ 6525.957249] ---[ end trace cecc3f93b14927e2 ]--- The reason is the offset[] creation and later usage while building the eBPF body. The code currently omits the first instruction, since build_insn() will increase our ctx->idx before saving it. That was fine up until bounded eBPF loops were introduced. After that introduction, offset[0] must be the offset of the end of prologue which is the start of the 1st insn while, offset[n] holds the offset of the end of n-th insn. When "taken loop with back jump to 1st insn" test runs, it will eventually call bpf2a64_offset(-1, 2, ctx). Since negative indexing is permitted, the current outcome depends on the value stored in ctx->offset[-1], which has nothing to do with our array. If the value happens to be 0 the tests will work. If not this error triggers. 7c2e988 ("bpf: fix x64 JIT code generation for jmp to 1st insn") fixed an indentical bug on x86 when eBPF bounded loops were introduced. So let's fix it by creating the ctx->offset[] correctly in the first place and account for the first instruction while calculating the arm instruction offsets. Fixes: 2589726 ("bpf: introduce bounded loops") Reported-by: Naresh Kamboju <[email protected]> Reported-by: Jiri Olsa <[email protected]> Co-developed-by: Jean-Philippe Brucker <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Jean-Philippe Brucker <[email protected]> Co-developed-by: Yauheni Kaliuta <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Yauheni Kaliuta <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Ilias Apalodimas <[email protected]> --- Changes since v1: - Added Co-developed-by, Reported-by and Fixes tags correctly - Describe the expected context of ctx->offset[] in comments arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
kernel-patches-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 14, 2020
[ 6525.735488] Unexpected kernel BRK exception at EL1 [ 6525.735502] Internal error: ptrace BRK handler: f2000100 [#1] SMP [ 6525.741609] Modules linked in: nls_utf8 cifs libdes libarc4 dns_resolver fscache binfmt_misc nls_ascii nls_cp437 vfat fat aes_ce_blk crypto_simd cryptd aes_ce_cipher ghash_ce gf128mul efi_pstore sha2_ce sha256_arm64 sha1_ce evdev efivars efivarfs ip_tables x_tables autofs4 btrfs blake2b_generic xor xor_neon zstd_compress raid6_pq libcrc32c crc32c_generic ahci xhci_pci libahci xhci_hcd igb libata i2c_algo_bit nvme realtek usbcore nvme_core scsi_mod t10_pi netsec mdio_devres of_mdio gpio_keys fixed_phy libphy gpio_mb86s7x [ 6525.787760] CPU: 3 PID: 7881 Comm: test_verifier Tainted: G W 5.9.0-rc1+ #47 [ 6525.796111] Hardware name: Socionext SynQuacer E-series DeveloperBox, BIOS build #1 Jun 6 2020 [ 6525.804812] pstate: 20000005 (nzCv daif -PAN -UAO BTYPE=--) [ 6525.810390] pc : bpf_prog_c3d01833289b6311_F+0xc8/0x9f4 [ 6525.815613] lr : bpf_prog_d53bb52e3f4483f9_F+0x38/0xc8c [ 6525.820832] sp : ffff8000130cbb80 [ 6525.824141] x29: ffff8000130cbbb0 x28: 0000000000000000 [ 6525.829451] x27: 000005ef6fcbf39b x26: 0000000000000000 [ 6525.834759] x25: ffff8000130cbb80 x24: ffff800011dc7038 [ 6525.840067] x23: ffff8000130cbd00 x22: ffff0008f624d080 [ 6525.845375] x21: 0000000000000001 x20: ffff800011dc7000 [ 6525.850682] x19: 0000000000000000 x18: 0000000000000000 [ 6525.855990] x17: 0000000000000000 x16: 0000000000000000 [ 6525.861298] x15: 0000000000000000 x14: 0000000000000000 [ 6525.866606] x13: 0000000000000000 x12: 0000000000000000 [ 6525.871913] x11: 0000000000000001 x10: ffff8000000a660c [ 6525.877220] x9 : ffff800010951810 x8 : ffff8000130cbc38 [ 6525.882528] x7 : 0000000000000000 x6 : 0000009864cfa881 [ 6525.887836] x5 : 00ffffffffffffff x4 : 002880ba1a0b3e9f [ 6525.893144] x3 : 0000000000000018 x2 : ffff8000000a4374 [ 6525.898452] x1 : 000000000000000a x0 : 0000000000000009 [ 6525.903760] Call trace: [ 6525.906202] bpf_prog_c3d01833289b6311_F+0xc8/0x9f4 [ 6525.911076] bpf_prog_d53bb52e3f4483f9_F+0x38/0xc8c [ 6525.915957] bpf_dispatcher_xdp_func+0x14/0x20 [ 6525.920398] bpf_test_run+0x70/0x1b0 [ 6525.923969] bpf_prog_test_run_xdp+0xec/0x190 [ 6525.928326] __do_sys_bpf+0xc88/0x1b28 [ 6525.932072] __arm64_sys_bpf+0x24/0x30 [ 6525.935820] el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0x70/0x168 [ 6525.940607] do_el0_svc+0x28/0x88 [ 6525.943920] el0_sync_handler+0x88/0x190 [ 6525.947838] el0_sync+0x140/0x180 [ 6525.951154] Code: d4202000 d4202000 d4202000 d4202000 (d4202000) [ 6525.957249] ---[ end trace cecc3f93b14927e2 ]--- The reason is the offset[] creation and later usage while building the eBPF body. The code currently omits the first instruction, since build_insn() will increase our ctx->idx before saving it. That was fine up until bounded eBPF loops were introduced. After that introduction, offset[0] must be the offset of the end of prologue which is the start of the 1st insn while, offset[n] holds the offset of the end of n-th insn. When "taken loop with back jump to 1st insn" test runs, it will eventually call bpf2a64_offset(-1, 2, ctx). Since negative indexing is permitted, the current outcome depends on the value stored in ctx->offset[-1], which has nothing to do with our array. If the value happens to be 0 the tests will work. If not this error triggers. 7c2e988 ("bpf: fix x64 JIT code generation for jmp to 1st insn") fixed an indentical bug on x86 when eBPF bounded loops were introduced. So let's fix it by creating the ctx->offset[] correctly in the first place and account for the first instruction while calculating the arm instruction offsets. Fixes: 2589726 ("bpf: introduce bounded loops") Reported-by: Naresh Kamboju <[email protected]> Reported-by: Jiri Olsa <[email protected]> Co-developed-by: Jean-Philippe Brucker <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Jean-Philippe Brucker <[email protected]> Co-developed-by: Yauheni Kaliuta <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Yauheni Kaliuta <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Ilias Apalodimas <[email protected]> --- Changes since v1: - Added Co-developed-by, Reported-by and Fixes tags correctly - Describe the expected context of ctx->offset[] in comments arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
kernel-patches-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 14, 2020
[ 6525.735488] Unexpected kernel BRK exception at EL1 [ 6525.735502] Internal error: ptrace BRK handler: f2000100 [#1] SMP [ 6525.741609] Modules linked in: nls_utf8 cifs libdes libarc4 dns_resolver fscache binfmt_misc nls_ascii nls_cp437 vfat fat aes_ce_blk crypto_simd cryptd aes_ce_cipher ghash_ce gf128mul efi_pstore sha2_ce sha256_arm64 sha1_ce evdev efivars efivarfs ip_tables x_tables autofs4 btrfs blake2b_generic xor xor_neon zstd_compress raid6_pq libcrc32c crc32c_generic ahci xhci_pci libahci xhci_hcd igb libata i2c_algo_bit nvme realtek usbcore nvme_core scsi_mod t10_pi netsec mdio_devres of_mdio gpio_keys fixed_phy libphy gpio_mb86s7x [ 6525.787760] CPU: 3 PID: 7881 Comm: test_verifier Tainted: G W 5.9.0-rc1+ #47 [ 6525.796111] Hardware name: Socionext SynQuacer E-series DeveloperBox, BIOS build #1 Jun 6 2020 [ 6525.804812] pstate: 20000005 (nzCv daif -PAN -UAO BTYPE=--) [ 6525.810390] pc : bpf_prog_c3d01833289b6311_F+0xc8/0x9f4 [ 6525.815613] lr : bpf_prog_d53bb52e3f4483f9_F+0x38/0xc8c [ 6525.820832] sp : ffff8000130cbb80 [ 6525.824141] x29: ffff8000130cbbb0 x28: 0000000000000000 [ 6525.829451] x27: 000005ef6fcbf39b x26: 0000000000000000 [ 6525.834759] x25: ffff8000130cbb80 x24: ffff800011dc7038 [ 6525.840067] x23: ffff8000130cbd00 x22: ffff0008f624d080 [ 6525.845375] x21: 0000000000000001 x20: ffff800011dc7000 [ 6525.850682] x19: 0000000000000000 x18: 0000000000000000 [ 6525.855990] x17: 0000000000000000 x16: 0000000000000000 [ 6525.861298] x15: 0000000000000000 x14: 0000000000000000 [ 6525.866606] x13: 0000000000000000 x12: 0000000000000000 [ 6525.871913] x11: 0000000000000001 x10: ffff8000000a660c [ 6525.877220] x9 : ffff800010951810 x8 : ffff8000130cbc38 [ 6525.882528] x7 : 0000000000000000 x6 : 0000009864cfa881 [ 6525.887836] x5 : 00ffffffffffffff x4 : 002880ba1a0b3e9f [ 6525.893144] x3 : 0000000000000018 x2 : ffff8000000a4374 [ 6525.898452] x1 : 000000000000000a x0 : 0000000000000009 [ 6525.903760] Call trace: [ 6525.906202] bpf_prog_c3d01833289b6311_F+0xc8/0x9f4 [ 6525.911076] bpf_prog_d53bb52e3f4483f9_F+0x38/0xc8c [ 6525.915957] bpf_dispatcher_xdp_func+0x14/0x20 [ 6525.920398] bpf_test_run+0x70/0x1b0 [ 6525.923969] bpf_prog_test_run_xdp+0xec/0x190 [ 6525.928326] __do_sys_bpf+0xc88/0x1b28 [ 6525.932072] __arm64_sys_bpf+0x24/0x30 [ 6525.935820] el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0x70/0x168 [ 6525.940607] do_el0_svc+0x28/0x88 [ 6525.943920] el0_sync_handler+0x88/0x190 [ 6525.947838] el0_sync+0x140/0x180 [ 6525.951154] Code: d4202000 d4202000 d4202000 d4202000 (d4202000) [ 6525.957249] ---[ end trace cecc3f93b14927e2 ]--- The reason is the offset[] creation and later usage while building the eBPF body. The code currently omits the first instruction, since build_insn() will increase our ctx->idx before saving it. That was fine up until bounded eBPF loops were introduced. After that introduction, offset[0] must be the offset of the end of prologue which is the start of the 1st insn while, offset[n] holds the offset of the end of n-th insn. When "taken loop with back jump to 1st insn" test runs, it will eventually call bpf2a64_offset(-1, 2, ctx). Since negative indexing is permitted, the current outcome depends on the value stored in ctx->offset[-1], which has nothing to do with our array. If the value happens to be 0 the tests will work. If not this error triggers. 7c2e988 ("bpf: fix x64 JIT code generation for jmp to 1st insn") fixed an indentical bug on x86 when eBPF bounded loops were introduced. So let's fix it by creating the ctx->offset[] correctly in the first place and account for the first instruction while calculating the arm instruction offsets. Fixes: 2589726 ("bpf: introduce bounded loops") Reported-by: Naresh Kamboju <[email protected]> Reported-by: Jiri Olsa <[email protected]> Co-developed-by: Jean-Philippe Brucker <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Jean-Philippe Brucker <[email protected]> Co-developed-by: Yauheni Kaliuta <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Yauheni Kaliuta <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Ilias Apalodimas <[email protected]> --- Changes since v1: - Added Co-developed-by, Reported-by and Fixes tags correctly - Describe the expected context of ctx->offset[] in comments arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
kernel-patches-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 14, 2020
[ 6525.735488] Unexpected kernel BRK exception at EL1 [ 6525.735502] Internal error: ptrace BRK handler: f2000100 [#1] SMP [ 6525.741609] Modules linked in: nls_utf8 cifs libdes libarc4 dns_resolver fscache binfmt_misc nls_ascii nls_cp437 vfat fat aes_ce_blk crypto_simd cryptd aes_ce_cipher ghash_ce gf128mul efi_pstore sha2_ce sha256_arm64 sha1_ce evdev efivars efivarfs ip_tables x_tables autofs4 btrfs blake2b_generic xor xor_neon zstd_compress raid6_pq libcrc32c crc32c_generic ahci xhci_pci libahci xhci_hcd igb libata i2c_algo_bit nvme realtek usbcore nvme_core scsi_mod t10_pi netsec mdio_devres of_mdio gpio_keys fixed_phy libphy gpio_mb86s7x [ 6525.787760] CPU: 3 PID: 7881 Comm: test_verifier Tainted: G W 5.9.0-rc1+ #47 [ 6525.796111] Hardware name: Socionext SynQuacer E-series DeveloperBox, BIOS build #1 Jun 6 2020 [ 6525.804812] pstate: 20000005 (nzCv daif -PAN -UAO BTYPE=--) [ 6525.810390] pc : bpf_prog_c3d01833289b6311_F+0xc8/0x9f4 [ 6525.815613] lr : bpf_prog_d53bb52e3f4483f9_F+0x38/0xc8c [ 6525.820832] sp : ffff8000130cbb80 [ 6525.824141] x29: ffff8000130cbbb0 x28: 0000000000000000 [ 6525.829451] x27: 000005ef6fcbf39b x26: 0000000000000000 [ 6525.834759] x25: ffff8000130cbb80 x24: ffff800011dc7038 [ 6525.840067] x23: ffff8000130cbd00 x22: ffff0008f624d080 [ 6525.845375] x21: 0000000000000001 x20: ffff800011dc7000 [ 6525.850682] x19: 0000000000000000 x18: 0000000000000000 [ 6525.855990] x17: 0000000000000000 x16: 0000000000000000 [ 6525.861298] x15: 0000000000000000 x14: 0000000000000000 [ 6525.866606] x13: 0000000000000000 x12: 0000000000000000 [ 6525.871913] x11: 0000000000000001 x10: ffff8000000a660c [ 6525.877220] x9 : ffff800010951810 x8 : ffff8000130cbc38 [ 6525.882528] x7 : 0000000000000000 x6 : 0000009864cfa881 [ 6525.887836] x5 : 00ffffffffffffff x4 : 002880ba1a0b3e9f [ 6525.893144] x3 : 0000000000000018 x2 : ffff8000000a4374 [ 6525.898452] x1 : 000000000000000a x0 : 0000000000000009 [ 6525.903760] Call trace: [ 6525.906202] bpf_prog_c3d01833289b6311_F+0xc8/0x9f4 [ 6525.911076] bpf_prog_d53bb52e3f4483f9_F+0x38/0xc8c [ 6525.915957] bpf_dispatcher_xdp_func+0x14/0x20 [ 6525.920398] bpf_test_run+0x70/0x1b0 [ 6525.923969] bpf_prog_test_run_xdp+0xec/0x190 [ 6525.928326] __do_sys_bpf+0xc88/0x1b28 [ 6525.932072] __arm64_sys_bpf+0x24/0x30 [ 6525.935820] el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0x70/0x168 [ 6525.940607] do_el0_svc+0x28/0x88 [ 6525.943920] el0_sync_handler+0x88/0x190 [ 6525.947838] el0_sync+0x140/0x180 [ 6525.951154] Code: d4202000 d4202000 d4202000 d4202000 (d4202000) [ 6525.957249] ---[ end trace cecc3f93b14927e2 ]--- The reason is the offset[] creation and later usage while building the eBPF body. The code currently omits the first instruction, since build_insn() will increase our ctx->idx before saving it. That was fine up until bounded eBPF loops were introduced. After that introduction, offset[0] must be the offset of the end of prologue which is the start of the 1st insn while, offset[n] holds the offset of the end of n-th insn. When "taken loop with back jump to 1st insn" test runs, it will eventually call bpf2a64_offset(-1, 2, ctx). Since negative indexing is permitted, the current outcome depends on the value stored in ctx->offset[-1], which has nothing to do with our array. If the value happens to be 0 the tests will work. If not this error triggers. 7c2e988 ("bpf: fix x64 JIT code generation for jmp to 1st insn") fixed an indentical bug on x86 when eBPF bounded loops were introduced. So let's fix it by creating the ctx->offset[] correctly in the first place and account for the first instruction while calculating the arm instruction offsets. Fixes: 2589726 ("bpf: introduce bounded loops") Reported-by: Naresh Kamboju <[email protected]> Reported-by: Jiri Olsa <[email protected]> Co-developed-by: Jean-Philippe Brucker <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Jean-Philippe Brucker <[email protected]> Co-developed-by: Yauheni Kaliuta <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Yauheni Kaliuta <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Ilias Apalodimas <[email protected]> --- Changes since v1: - Added Co-developed-by, Reported-by and Fixes tags correctly - Describe the expected context of ctx->offset[] in comments arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
kernel-patches-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 14, 2020
[ 6525.735488] Unexpected kernel BRK exception at EL1 [ 6525.735502] Internal error: ptrace BRK handler: f2000100 [#1] SMP [ 6525.741609] Modules linked in: nls_utf8 cifs libdes libarc4 dns_resolver fscache binfmt_misc nls_ascii nls_cp437 vfat fat aes_ce_blk crypto_simd cryptd aes_ce_cipher ghash_ce gf128mul efi_pstore sha2_ce sha256_arm64 sha1_ce evdev efivars efivarfs ip_tables x_tables autofs4 btrfs blake2b_generic xor xor_neon zstd_compress raid6_pq libcrc32c crc32c_generic ahci xhci_pci libahci xhci_hcd igb libata i2c_algo_bit nvme realtek usbcore nvme_core scsi_mod t10_pi netsec mdio_devres of_mdio gpio_keys fixed_phy libphy gpio_mb86s7x [ 6525.787760] CPU: 3 PID: 7881 Comm: test_verifier Tainted: G W 5.9.0-rc1+ #47 [ 6525.796111] Hardware name: Socionext SynQuacer E-series DeveloperBox, BIOS build #1 Jun 6 2020 [ 6525.804812] pstate: 20000005 (nzCv daif -PAN -UAO BTYPE=--) [ 6525.810390] pc : bpf_prog_c3d01833289b6311_F+0xc8/0x9f4 [ 6525.815613] lr : bpf_prog_d53bb52e3f4483f9_F+0x38/0xc8c [ 6525.820832] sp : ffff8000130cbb80 [ 6525.824141] x29: ffff8000130cbbb0 x28: 0000000000000000 [ 6525.829451] x27: 000005ef6fcbf39b x26: 0000000000000000 [ 6525.834759] x25: ffff8000130cbb80 x24: ffff800011dc7038 [ 6525.840067] x23: ffff8000130cbd00 x22: ffff0008f624d080 [ 6525.845375] x21: 0000000000000001 x20: ffff800011dc7000 [ 6525.850682] x19: 0000000000000000 x18: 0000000000000000 [ 6525.855990] x17: 0000000000000000 x16: 0000000000000000 [ 6525.861298] x15: 0000000000000000 x14: 0000000000000000 [ 6525.866606] x13: 0000000000000000 x12: 0000000000000000 [ 6525.871913] x11: 0000000000000001 x10: ffff8000000a660c [ 6525.877220] x9 : ffff800010951810 x8 : ffff8000130cbc38 [ 6525.882528] x7 : 0000000000000000 x6 : 0000009864cfa881 [ 6525.887836] x5 : 00ffffffffffffff x4 : 002880ba1a0b3e9f [ 6525.893144] x3 : 0000000000000018 x2 : ffff8000000a4374 [ 6525.898452] x1 : 000000000000000a x0 : 0000000000000009 [ 6525.903760] Call trace: [ 6525.906202] bpf_prog_c3d01833289b6311_F+0xc8/0x9f4 [ 6525.911076] bpf_prog_d53bb52e3f4483f9_F+0x38/0xc8c [ 6525.915957] bpf_dispatcher_xdp_func+0x14/0x20 [ 6525.920398] bpf_test_run+0x70/0x1b0 [ 6525.923969] bpf_prog_test_run_xdp+0xec/0x190 [ 6525.928326] __do_sys_bpf+0xc88/0x1b28 [ 6525.932072] __arm64_sys_bpf+0x24/0x30 [ 6525.935820] el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0x70/0x168 [ 6525.940607] do_el0_svc+0x28/0x88 [ 6525.943920] el0_sync_handler+0x88/0x190 [ 6525.947838] el0_sync+0x140/0x180 [ 6525.951154] Code: d4202000 d4202000 d4202000 d4202000 (d4202000) [ 6525.957249] ---[ end trace cecc3f93b14927e2 ]--- The reason is the offset[] creation and later usage while building the eBPF body. The code currently omits the first instruction, since build_insn() will increase our ctx->idx before saving it. That was fine up until bounded eBPF loops were introduced. After that introduction, offset[0] must be the offset of the end of prologue which is the start of the 1st insn while, offset[n] holds the offset of the end of n-th insn. When "taken loop with back jump to 1st insn" test runs, it will eventually call bpf2a64_offset(-1, 2, ctx). Since negative indexing is permitted, the current outcome depends on the value stored in ctx->offset[-1], which has nothing to do with our array. If the value happens to be 0 the tests will work. If not this error triggers. 7c2e988 ("bpf: fix x64 JIT code generation for jmp to 1st insn") fixed an indentical bug on x86 when eBPF bounded loops were introduced. So let's fix it by creating the ctx->offset[] correctly in the first place and account for the first instruction while calculating the arm instruction offsets. Fixes: 2589726 ("bpf: introduce bounded loops") Reported-by: Naresh Kamboju <[email protected]> Reported-by: Jiri Olsa <[email protected]> Co-developed-by: Jean-Philippe Brucker <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Jean-Philippe Brucker <[email protected]> Co-developed-by: Yauheni Kaliuta <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Yauheni Kaliuta <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Ilias Apalodimas <[email protected]> --- Changes since v1: - Added Co-developed-by, Reported-by and Fixes tags correctly - Describe the expected context of ctx->offset[] in comments arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
kernel-patches-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 15, 2020
[ 6525.735488] Unexpected kernel BRK exception at EL1 [ 6525.735502] Internal error: ptrace BRK handler: f2000100 [#1] SMP [ 6525.741609] Modules linked in: nls_utf8 cifs libdes libarc4 dns_resolver fscache binfmt_misc nls_ascii nls_cp437 vfat fat aes_ce_blk crypto_simd cryptd aes_ce_cipher ghash_ce gf128mul efi_pstore sha2_ce sha256_arm64 sha1_ce evdev efivars efivarfs ip_tables x_tables autofs4 btrfs blake2b_generic xor xor_neon zstd_compress raid6_pq libcrc32c crc32c_generic ahci xhci_pci libahci xhci_hcd igb libata i2c_algo_bit nvme realtek usbcore nvme_core scsi_mod t10_pi netsec mdio_devres of_mdio gpio_keys fixed_phy libphy gpio_mb86s7x [ 6525.787760] CPU: 3 PID: 7881 Comm: test_verifier Tainted: G W 5.9.0-rc1+ #47 [ 6525.796111] Hardware name: Socionext SynQuacer E-series DeveloperBox, BIOS build #1 Jun 6 2020 [ 6525.804812] pstate: 20000005 (nzCv daif -PAN -UAO BTYPE=--) [ 6525.810390] pc : bpf_prog_c3d01833289b6311_F+0xc8/0x9f4 [ 6525.815613] lr : bpf_prog_d53bb52e3f4483f9_F+0x38/0xc8c [ 6525.820832] sp : ffff8000130cbb80 [ 6525.824141] x29: ffff8000130cbbb0 x28: 0000000000000000 [ 6525.829451] x27: 000005ef6fcbf39b x26: 0000000000000000 [ 6525.834759] x25: ffff8000130cbb80 x24: ffff800011dc7038 [ 6525.840067] x23: ffff8000130cbd00 x22: ffff0008f624d080 [ 6525.845375] x21: 0000000000000001 x20: ffff800011dc7000 [ 6525.850682] x19: 0000000000000000 x18: 0000000000000000 [ 6525.855990] x17: 0000000000000000 x16: 0000000000000000 [ 6525.861298] x15: 0000000000000000 x14: 0000000000000000 [ 6525.866606] x13: 0000000000000000 x12: 0000000000000000 [ 6525.871913] x11: 0000000000000001 x10: ffff8000000a660c [ 6525.877220] x9 : ffff800010951810 x8 : ffff8000130cbc38 [ 6525.882528] x7 : 0000000000000000 x6 : 0000009864cfa881 [ 6525.887836] x5 : 00ffffffffffffff x4 : 002880ba1a0b3e9f [ 6525.893144] x3 : 0000000000000018 x2 : ffff8000000a4374 [ 6525.898452] x1 : 000000000000000a x0 : 0000000000000009 [ 6525.903760] Call trace: [ 6525.906202] bpf_prog_c3d01833289b6311_F+0xc8/0x9f4 [ 6525.911076] bpf_prog_d53bb52e3f4483f9_F+0x38/0xc8c [ 6525.915957] bpf_dispatcher_xdp_func+0x14/0x20 [ 6525.920398] bpf_test_run+0x70/0x1b0 [ 6525.923969] bpf_prog_test_run_xdp+0xec/0x190 [ 6525.928326] __do_sys_bpf+0xc88/0x1b28 [ 6525.932072] __arm64_sys_bpf+0x24/0x30 [ 6525.935820] el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0x70/0x168 [ 6525.940607] do_el0_svc+0x28/0x88 [ 6525.943920] el0_sync_handler+0x88/0x190 [ 6525.947838] el0_sync+0x140/0x180 [ 6525.951154] Code: d4202000 d4202000 d4202000 d4202000 (d4202000) [ 6525.957249] ---[ end trace cecc3f93b14927e2 ]--- The reason is the offset[] creation and later usage while building the eBPF body. The code currently omits the first instruction, since build_insn() will increase our ctx->idx before saving it. That was fine up until bounded eBPF loops were introduced. After that introduction, offset[0] must be the offset of the end of prologue which is the start of the 1st insn while, offset[n] holds the offset of the end of n-th insn. When "taken loop with back jump to 1st insn" test runs, it will eventually call bpf2a64_offset(-1, 2, ctx). Since negative indexing is permitted, the current outcome depends on the value stored in ctx->offset[-1], which has nothing to do with our array. If the value happens to be 0 the tests will work. If not this error triggers. 7c2e988 ("bpf: fix x64 JIT code generation for jmp to 1st insn") fixed an indentical bug on x86 when eBPF bounded loops were introduced. So let's fix it by creating the ctx->offset[] correctly in the first place and account for the first instruction while calculating the arm instruction offsets. Fixes: 2589726 ("bpf: introduce bounded loops") Reported-by: Naresh Kamboju <[email protected]> Reported-by: Jiri Olsa <[email protected]> Co-developed-by: Jean-Philippe Brucker <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Jean-Philippe Brucker <[email protected]> Co-developed-by: Yauheni Kaliuta <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Yauheni Kaliuta <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Ilias Apalodimas <[email protected]> --- Changes since v1: - Added Co-developed-by, Reported-by and Fixes tags correctly - Describe the expected context of ctx->offset[] in comments arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
kernel-patches-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 15, 2020
[ 6525.735488] Unexpected kernel BRK exception at EL1 [ 6525.735502] Internal error: ptrace BRK handler: f2000100 [#1] SMP [ 6525.741609] Modules linked in: nls_utf8 cifs libdes libarc4 dns_resolver fscache binfmt_misc nls_ascii nls_cp437 vfat fat aes_ce_blk crypto_simd cryptd aes_ce_cipher ghash_ce gf128mul efi_pstore sha2_ce sha256_arm64 sha1_ce evdev efivars efivarfs ip_tables x_tables autofs4 btrfs blake2b_generic xor xor_neon zstd_compress raid6_pq libcrc32c crc32c_generic ahci xhci_pci libahci xhci_hcd igb libata i2c_algo_bit nvme realtek usbcore nvme_core scsi_mod t10_pi netsec mdio_devres of_mdio gpio_keys fixed_phy libphy gpio_mb86s7x [ 6525.787760] CPU: 3 PID: 7881 Comm: test_verifier Tainted: G W 5.9.0-rc1+ #47 [ 6525.796111] Hardware name: Socionext SynQuacer E-series DeveloperBox, BIOS build #1 Jun 6 2020 [ 6525.804812] pstate: 20000005 (nzCv daif -PAN -UAO BTYPE=--) [ 6525.810390] pc : bpf_prog_c3d01833289b6311_F+0xc8/0x9f4 [ 6525.815613] lr : bpf_prog_d53bb52e3f4483f9_F+0x38/0xc8c [ 6525.820832] sp : ffff8000130cbb80 [ 6525.824141] x29: ffff8000130cbbb0 x28: 0000000000000000 [ 6525.829451] x27: 000005ef6fcbf39b x26: 0000000000000000 [ 6525.834759] x25: ffff8000130cbb80 x24: ffff800011dc7038 [ 6525.840067] x23: ffff8000130cbd00 x22: ffff0008f624d080 [ 6525.845375] x21: 0000000000000001 x20: ffff800011dc7000 [ 6525.850682] x19: 0000000000000000 x18: 0000000000000000 [ 6525.855990] x17: 0000000000000000 x16: 0000000000000000 [ 6525.861298] x15: 0000000000000000 x14: 0000000000000000 [ 6525.866606] x13: 0000000000000000 x12: 0000000000000000 [ 6525.871913] x11: 0000000000000001 x10: ffff8000000a660c [ 6525.877220] x9 : ffff800010951810 x8 : ffff8000130cbc38 [ 6525.882528] x7 : 0000000000000000 x6 : 0000009864cfa881 [ 6525.887836] x5 : 00ffffffffffffff x4 : 002880ba1a0b3e9f [ 6525.893144] x3 : 0000000000000018 x2 : ffff8000000a4374 [ 6525.898452] x1 : 000000000000000a x0 : 0000000000000009 [ 6525.903760] Call trace: [ 6525.906202] bpf_prog_c3d01833289b6311_F+0xc8/0x9f4 [ 6525.911076] bpf_prog_d53bb52e3f4483f9_F+0x38/0xc8c [ 6525.915957] bpf_dispatcher_xdp_func+0x14/0x20 [ 6525.920398] bpf_test_run+0x70/0x1b0 [ 6525.923969] bpf_prog_test_run_xdp+0xec/0x190 [ 6525.928326] __do_sys_bpf+0xc88/0x1b28 [ 6525.932072] __arm64_sys_bpf+0x24/0x30 [ 6525.935820] el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0x70/0x168 [ 6525.940607] do_el0_svc+0x28/0x88 [ 6525.943920] el0_sync_handler+0x88/0x190 [ 6525.947838] el0_sync+0x140/0x180 [ 6525.951154] Code: d4202000 d4202000 d4202000 d4202000 (d4202000) [ 6525.957249] ---[ end trace cecc3f93b14927e2 ]--- The reason is the offset[] creation and later usage while building the eBPF body. The code currently omits the first instruction, since build_insn() will increase our ctx->idx before saving it. That was fine up until bounded eBPF loops were introduced. After that introduction, offset[0] must be the offset of the end of prologue which is the start of the 1st insn while, offset[n] holds the offset of the end of n-th insn. When "taken loop with back jump to 1st insn" test runs, it will eventually call bpf2a64_offset(-1, 2, ctx). Since negative indexing is permitted, the current outcome depends on the value stored in ctx->offset[-1], which has nothing to do with our array. If the value happens to be 0 the tests will work. If not this error triggers. 7c2e988 ("bpf: fix x64 JIT code generation for jmp to 1st insn") fixed an indentical bug on x86 when eBPF bounded loops were introduced. So let's fix it by creating the ctx->offset[] correctly in the first place and account for the first instruction while calculating the arm instruction offsets. Fixes: 2589726 ("bpf: introduce bounded loops") Reported-by: Naresh Kamboju <[email protected]> Reported-by: Jiri Olsa <[email protected]> Co-developed-by: Jean-Philippe Brucker <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Jean-Philippe Brucker <[email protected]> Co-developed-by: Yauheni Kaliuta <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Yauheni Kaliuta <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Ilias Apalodimas <[email protected]> --- Changes since v1: - Added Co-developed-by, Reported-by and Fixes tags correctly - Describe the expected context of ctx->offset[] in comments arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
kernel-patches-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 15, 2020
[ 6525.735488] Unexpected kernel BRK exception at EL1 [ 6525.735502] Internal error: ptrace BRK handler: f2000100 [#1] SMP [ 6525.741609] Modules linked in: nls_utf8 cifs libdes libarc4 dns_resolver fscache binfmt_misc nls_ascii nls_cp437 vfat fat aes_ce_blk crypto_simd cryptd aes_ce_cipher ghash_ce gf128mul efi_pstore sha2_ce sha256_arm64 sha1_ce evdev efivars efivarfs ip_tables x_tables autofs4 btrfs blake2b_generic xor xor_neon zstd_compress raid6_pq libcrc32c crc32c_generic ahci xhci_pci libahci xhci_hcd igb libata i2c_algo_bit nvme realtek usbcore nvme_core scsi_mod t10_pi netsec mdio_devres of_mdio gpio_keys fixed_phy libphy gpio_mb86s7x [ 6525.787760] CPU: 3 PID: 7881 Comm: test_verifier Tainted: G W 5.9.0-rc1+ #47 [ 6525.796111] Hardware name: Socionext SynQuacer E-series DeveloperBox, BIOS build #1 Jun 6 2020 [ 6525.804812] pstate: 20000005 (nzCv daif -PAN -UAO BTYPE=--) [ 6525.810390] pc : bpf_prog_c3d01833289b6311_F+0xc8/0x9f4 [ 6525.815613] lr : bpf_prog_d53bb52e3f4483f9_F+0x38/0xc8c [ 6525.820832] sp : ffff8000130cbb80 [ 6525.824141] x29: ffff8000130cbbb0 x28: 0000000000000000 [ 6525.829451] x27: 000005ef6fcbf39b x26: 0000000000000000 [ 6525.834759] x25: ffff8000130cbb80 x24: ffff800011dc7038 [ 6525.840067] x23: ffff8000130cbd00 x22: ffff0008f624d080 [ 6525.845375] x21: 0000000000000001 x20: ffff800011dc7000 [ 6525.850682] x19: 0000000000000000 x18: 0000000000000000 [ 6525.855990] x17: 0000000000000000 x16: 0000000000000000 [ 6525.861298] x15: 0000000000000000 x14: 0000000000000000 [ 6525.866606] x13: 0000000000000000 x12: 0000000000000000 [ 6525.871913] x11: 0000000000000001 x10: ffff8000000a660c [ 6525.877220] x9 : ffff800010951810 x8 : ffff8000130cbc38 [ 6525.882528] x7 : 0000000000000000 x6 : 0000009864cfa881 [ 6525.887836] x5 : 00ffffffffffffff x4 : 002880ba1a0b3e9f [ 6525.893144] x3 : 0000000000000018 x2 : ffff8000000a4374 [ 6525.898452] x1 : 000000000000000a x0 : 0000000000000009 [ 6525.903760] Call trace: [ 6525.906202] bpf_prog_c3d01833289b6311_F+0xc8/0x9f4 [ 6525.911076] bpf_prog_d53bb52e3f4483f9_F+0x38/0xc8c [ 6525.915957] bpf_dispatcher_xdp_func+0x14/0x20 [ 6525.920398] bpf_test_run+0x70/0x1b0 [ 6525.923969] bpf_prog_test_run_xdp+0xec/0x190 [ 6525.928326] __do_sys_bpf+0xc88/0x1b28 [ 6525.932072] __arm64_sys_bpf+0x24/0x30 [ 6525.935820] el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0x70/0x168 [ 6525.940607] do_el0_svc+0x28/0x88 [ 6525.943920] el0_sync_handler+0x88/0x190 [ 6525.947838] el0_sync+0x140/0x180 [ 6525.951154] Code: d4202000 d4202000 d4202000 d4202000 (d4202000) [ 6525.957249] ---[ end trace cecc3f93b14927e2 ]--- The reason is the offset[] creation and later usage while building the eBPF body. The code currently omits the first instruction, since build_insn() will increase our ctx->idx before saving it. That was fine up until bounded eBPF loops were introduced. After that introduction, offset[0] must be the offset of the end of prologue which is the start of the 1st insn while, offset[n] holds the offset of the end of n-th insn. When "taken loop with back jump to 1st insn" test runs, it will eventually call bpf2a64_offset(-1, 2, ctx). Since negative indexing is permitted, the current outcome depends on the value stored in ctx->offset[-1], which has nothing to do with our array. If the value happens to be 0 the tests will work. If not this error triggers. 7c2e988 ("bpf: fix x64 JIT code generation for jmp to 1st insn") fixed an indentical bug on x86 when eBPF bounded loops were introduced. So let's fix it by creating the ctx->offset[] correctly in the first place and account for the first instruction while calculating the arm instruction offsets. Fixes: 2589726 ("bpf: introduce bounded loops") Reported-by: Naresh Kamboju <[email protected]> Reported-by: Jiri Olsa <[email protected]> Co-developed-by: Jean-Philippe Brucker <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Jean-Philippe Brucker <[email protected]> Co-developed-by: Yauheni Kaliuta <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Yauheni Kaliuta <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Ilias Apalodimas <[email protected]> --- Changes since v1: - Added Co-developed-by, Reported-by and Fixes tags correctly - Describe the expected context of ctx->offset[] in comments arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
kernel-patches-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 15, 2020
[ 6525.735488] Unexpected kernel BRK exception at EL1 [ 6525.735502] Internal error: ptrace BRK handler: f2000100 [#1] SMP [ 6525.741609] Modules linked in: nls_utf8 cifs libdes libarc4 dns_resolver fscache binfmt_misc nls_ascii nls_cp437 vfat fat aes_ce_blk crypto_simd cryptd aes_ce_cipher ghash_ce gf128mul efi_pstore sha2_ce sha256_arm64 sha1_ce evdev efivars efivarfs ip_tables x_tables autofs4 btrfs blake2b_generic xor xor_neon zstd_compress raid6_pq libcrc32c crc32c_generic ahci xhci_pci libahci xhci_hcd igb libata i2c_algo_bit nvme realtek usbcore nvme_core scsi_mod t10_pi netsec mdio_devres of_mdio gpio_keys fixed_phy libphy gpio_mb86s7x [ 6525.787760] CPU: 3 PID: 7881 Comm: test_verifier Tainted: G W 5.9.0-rc1+ #47 [ 6525.796111] Hardware name: Socionext SynQuacer E-series DeveloperBox, BIOS build #1 Jun 6 2020 [ 6525.804812] pstate: 20000005 (nzCv daif -PAN -UAO BTYPE=--) [ 6525.810390] pc : bpf_prog_c3d01833289b6311_F+0xc8/0x9f4 [ 6525.815613] lr : bpf_prog_d53bb52e3f4483f9_F+0x38/0xc8c [ 6525.820832] sp : ffff8000130cbb80 [ 6525.824141] x29: ffff8000130cbbb0 x28: 0000000000000000 [ 6525.829451] x27: 000005ef6fcbf39b x26: 0000000000000000 [ 6525.834759] x25: ffff8000130cbb80 x24: ffff800011dc7038 [ 6525.840067] x23: ffff8000130cbd00 x22: ffff0008f624d080 [ 6525.845375] x21: 0000000000000001 x20: ffff800011dc7000 [ 6525.850682] x19: 0000000000000000 x18: 0000000000000000 [ 6525.855990] x17: 0000000000000000 x16: 0000000000000000 [ 6525.861298] x15: 0000000000000000 x14: 0000000000000000 [ 6525.866606] x13: 0000000000000000 x12: 0000000000000000 [ 6525.871913] x11: 0000000000000001 x10: ffff8000000a660c [ 6525.877220] x9 : ffff800010951810 x8 : ffff8000130cbc38 [ 6525.882528] x7 : 0000000000000000 x6 : 0000009864cfa881 [ 6525.887836] x5 : 00ffffffffffffff x4 : 002880ba1a0b3e9f [ 6525.893144] x3 : 0000000000000018 x2 : ffff8000000a4374 [ 6525.898452] x1 : 000000000000000a x0 : 0000000000000009 [ 6525.903760] Call trace: [ 6525.906202] bpf_prog_c3d01833289b6311_F+0xc8/0x9f4 [ 6525.911076] bpf_prog_d53bb52e3f4483f9_F+0x38/0xc8c [ 6525.915957] bpf_dispatcher_xdp_func+0x14/0x20 [ 6525.920398] bpf_test_run+0x70/0x1b0 [ 6525.923969] bpf_prog_test_run_xdp+0xec/0x190 [ 6525.928326] __do_sys_bpf+0xc88/0x1b28 [ 6525.932072] __arm64_sys_bpf+0x24/0x30 [ 6525.935820] el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0x70/0x168 [ 6525.940607] do_el0_svc+0x28/0x88 [ 6525.943920] el0_sync_handler+0x88/0x190 [ 6525.947838] el0_sync+0x140/0x180 [ 6525.951154] Code: d4202000 d4202000 d4202000 d4202000 (d4202000) [ 6525.957249] ---[ end trace cecc3f93b14927e2 ]--- The reason is the offset[] creation and later usage while building the eBPF body. The code currently omits the first instruction, since build_insn() will increase our ctx->idx before saving it. That was fine up until bounded eBPF loops were introduced. After that introduction, offset[0] must be the offset of the end of prologue which is the start of the 1st insn while, offset[n] holds the offset of the end of n-th insn. When "taken loop with back jump to 1st insn" test runs, it will eventually call bpf2a64_offset(-1, 2, ctx). Since negative indexing is permitted, the current outcome depends on the value stored in ctx->offset[-1], which has nothing to do with our array. If the value happens to be 0 the tests will work. If not this error triggers. 7c2e988 ("bpf: fix x64 JIT code generation for jmp to 1st insn") fixed an indentical bug on x86 when eBPF bounded loops were introduced. So let's fix it by creating the ctx->offset[] correctly in the first place and account for the first instruction while calculating the arm instruction offsets. Fixes: 2589726 ("bpf: introduce bounded loops") Reported-by: Naresh Kamboju <[email protected]> Reported-by: Jiri Olsa <[email protected]> Co-developed-by: Jean-Philippe Brucker <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Jean-Philippe Brucker <[email protected]> Co-developed-by: Yauheni Kaliuta <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Yauheni Kaliuta <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Ilias Apalodimas <[email protected]> --- Changes since v1: - Added Co-developed-by, Reported-by and Fixes tags correctly - Describe the expected context of ctx->offset[] in comments arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
kernel-patches-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 15, 2020
[ 6525.735488] Unexpected kernel BRK exception at EL1 [ 6525.735502] Internal error: ptrace BRK handler: f2000100 [#1] SMP [ 6525.741609] Modules linked in: nls_utf8 cifs libdes libarc4 dns_resolver fscache binfmt_misc nls_ascii nls_cp437 vfat fat aes_ce_blk crypto_simd cryptd aes_ce_cipher ghash_ce gf128mul efi_pstore sha2_ce sha256_arm64 sha1_ce evdev efivars efivarfs ip_tables x_tables autofs4 btrfs blake2b_generic xor xor_neon zstd_compress raid6_pq libcrc32c crc32c_generic ahci xhci_pci libahci xhci_hcd igb libata i2c_algo_bit nvme realtek usbcore nvme_core scsi_mod t10_pi netsec mdio_devres of_mdio gpio_keys fixed_phy libphy gpio_mb86s7x [ 6525.787760] CPU: 3 PID: 7881 Comm: test_verifier Tainted: G W 5.9.0-rc1+ #47 [ 6525.796111] Hardware name: Socionext SynQuacer E-series DeveloperBox, BIOS build #1 Jun 6 2020 [ 6525.804812] pstate: 20000005 (nzCv daif -PAN -UAO BTYPE=--) [ 6525.810390] pc : bpf_prog_c3d01833289b6311_F+0xc8/0x9f4 [ 6525.815613] lr : bpf_prog_d53bb52e3f4483f9_F+0x38/0xc8c [ 6525.820832] sp : ffff8000130cbb80 [ 6525.824141] x29: ffff8000130cbbb0 x28: 0000000000000000 [ 6525.829451] x27: 000005ef6fcbf39b x26: 0000000000000000 [ 6525.834759] x25: ffff8000130cbb80 x24: ffff800011dc7038 [ 6525.840067] x23: ffff8000130cbd00 x22: ffff0008f624d080 [ 6525.845375] x21: 0000000000000001 x20: ffff800011dc7000 [ 6525.850682] x19: 0000000000000000 x18: 0000000000000000 [ 6525.855990] x17: 0000000000000000 x16: 0000000000000000 [ 6525.861298] x15: 0000000000000000 x14: 0000000000000000 [ 6525.866606] x13: 0000000000000000 x12: 0000000000000000 [ 6525.871913] x11: 0000000000000001 x10: ffff8000000a660c [ 6525.877220] x9 : ffff800010951810 x8 : ffff8000130cbc38 [ 6525.882528] x7 : 0000000000000000 x6 : 0000009864cfa881 [ 6525.887836] x5 : 00ffffffffffffff x4 : 002880ba1a0b3e9f [ 6525.893144] x3 : 0000000000000018 x2 : ffff8000000a4374 [ 6525.898452] x1 : 000000000000000a x0 : 0000000000000009 [ 6525.903760] Call trace: [ 6525.906202] bpf_prog_c3d01833289b6311_F+0xc8/0x9f4 [ 6525.911076] bpf_prog_d53bb52e3f4483f9_F+0x38/0xc8c [ 6525.915957] bpf_dispatcher_xdp_func+0x14/0x20 [ 6525.920398] bpf_test_run+0x70/0x1b0 [ 6525.923969] bpf_prog_test_run_xdp+0xec/0x190 [ 6525.928326] __do_sys_bpf+0xc88/0x1b28 [ 6525.932072] __arm64_sys_bpf+0x24/0x30 [ 6525.935820] el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0x70/0x168 [ 6525.940607] do_el0_svc+0x28/0x88 [ 6525.943920] el0_sync_handler+0x88/0x190 [ 6525.947838] el0_sync+0x140/0x180 [ 6525.951154] Code: d4202000 d4202000 d4202000 d4202000 (d4202000) [ 6525.957249] ---[ end trace cecc3f93b14927e2 ]--- The reason is the offset[] creation and later usage while building the eBPF body. The code currently omits the first instruction, since build_insn() will increase our ctx->idx before saving it. That was fine up until bounded eBPF loops were introduced. After that introduction, offset[0] must be the offset of the end of prologue which is the start of the 1st insn while, offset[n] holds the offset of the end of n-th insn. When "taken loop with back jump to 1st insn" test runs, it will eventually call bpf2a64_offset(-1, 2, ctx). Since negative indexing is permitted, the current outcome depends on the value stored in ctx->offset[-1], which has nothing to do with our array. If the value happens to be 0 the tests will work. If not this error triggers. 7c2e988 ("bpf: fix x64 JIT code generation for jmp to 1st insn") fixed an indentical bug on x86 when eBPF bounded loops were introduced. So let's fix it by creating the ctx->offset[] correctly in the first place and account for the first instruction while calculating the arm instruction offsets. Fixes: 2589726 ("bpf: introduce bounded loops") Reported-by: Naresh Kamboju <[email protected]> Reported-by: Jiri Olsa <[email protected]> Co-developed-by: Jean-Philippe Brucker <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Jean-Philippe Brucker <[email protected]> Co-developed-by: Yauheni Kaliuta <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Yauheni Kaliuta <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Ilias Apalodimas <[email protected]> --- Changes since v1: - Added Co-developed-by, Reported-by and Fixes tags correctly - Describe the expected context of ctx->offset[] in comments arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
kernel-patches-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 15, 2020
[ 6525.735488] Unexpected kernel BRK exception at EL1 [ 6525.735502] Internal error: ptrace BRK handler: f2000100 [#1] SMP [ 6525.741609] Modules linked in: nls_utf8 cifs libdes libarc4 dns_resolver fscache binfmt_misc nls_ascii nls_cp437 vfat fat aes_ce_blk crypto_simd cryptd aes_ce_cipher ghash_ce gf128mul efi_pstore sha2_ce sha256_arm64 sha1_ce evdev efivars efivarfs ip_tables x_tables autofs4 btrfs blake2b_generic xor xor_neon zstd_compress raid6_pq libcrc32c crc32c_generic ahci xhci_pci libahci xhci_hcd igb libata i2c_algo_bit nvme realtek usbcore nvme_core scsi_mod t10_pi netsec mdio_devres of_mdio gpio_keys fixed_phy libphy gpio_mb86s7x [ 6525.787760] CPU: 3 PID: 7881 Comm: test_verifier Tainted: G W 5.9.0-rc1+ #47 [ 6525.796111] Hardware name: Socionext SynQuacer E-series DeveloperBox, BIOS build #1 Jun 6 2020 [ 6525.804812] pstate: 20000005 (nzCv daif -PAN -UAO BTYPE=--) [ 6525.810390] pc : bpf_prog_c3d01833289b6311_F+0xc8/0x9f4 [ 6525.815613] lr : bpf_prog_d53bb52e3f4483f9_F+0x38/0xc8c [ 6525.820832] sp : ffff8000130cbb80 [ 6525.824141] x29: ffff8000130cbbb0 x28: 0000000000000000 [ 6525.829451] x27: 000005ef6fcbf39b x26: 0000000000000000 [ 6525.834759] x25: ffff8000130cbb80 x24: ffff800011dc7038 [ 6525.840067] x23: ffff8000130cbd00 x22: ffff0008f624d080 [ 6525.845375] x21: 0000000000000001 x20: ffff800011dc7000 [ 6525.850682] x19: 0000000000000000 x18: 0000000000000000 [ 6525.855990] x17: 0000000000000000 x16: 0000000000000000 [ 6525.861298] x15: 0000000000000000 x14: 0000000000000000 [ 6525.866606] x13: 0000000000000000 x12: 0000000000000000 [ 6525.871913] x11: 0000000000000001 x10: ffff8000000a660c [ 6525.877220] x9 : ffff800010951810 x8 : ffff8000130cbc38 [ 6525.882528] x7 : 0000000000000000 x6 : 0000009864cfa881 [ 6525.887836] x5 : 00ffffffffffffff x4 : 002880ba1a0b3e9f [ 6525.893144] x3 : 0000000000000018 x2 : ffff8000000a4374 [ 6525.898452] x1 : 000000000000000a x0 : 0000000000000009 [ 6525.903760] Call trace: [ 6525.906202] bpf_prog_c3d01833289b6311_F+0xc8/0x9f4 [ 6525.911076] bpf_prog_d53bb52e3f4483f9_F+0x38/0xc8c [ 6525.915957] bpf_dispatcher_xdp_func+0x14/0x20 [ 6525.920398] bpf_test_run+0x70/0x1b0 [ 6525.923969] bpf_prog_test_run_xdp+0xec/0x190 [ 6525.928326] __do_sys_bpf+0xc88/0x1b28 [ 6525.932072] __arm64_sys_bpf+0x24/0x30 [ 6525.935820] el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0x70/0x168 [ 6525.940607] do_el0_svc+0x28/0x88 [ 6525.943920] el0_sync_handler+0x88/0x190 [ 6525.947838] el0_sync+0x140/0x180 [ 6525.951154] Code: d4202000 d4202000 d4202000 d4202000 (d4202000) [ 6525.957249] ---[ end trace cecc3f93b14927e2 ]--- The reason is the offset[] creation and later usage while building the eBPF body. The code currently omits the first instruction, since build_insn() will increase our ctx->idx before saving it. That was fine up until bounded eBPF loops were introduced. After that introduction, offset[0] must be the offset of the end of prologue which is the start of the 1st insn while, offset[n] holds the offset of the end of n-th insn. When "taken loop with back jump to 1st insn" test runs, it will eventually call bpf2a64_offset(-1, 2, ctx). Since negative indexing is permitted, the current outcome depends on the value stored in ctx->offset[-1], which has nothing to do with our array. If the value happens to be 0 the tests will work. If not this error triggers. 7c2e988 ("bpf: fix x64 JIT code generation for jmp to 1st insn") fixed an indentical bug on x86 when eBPF bounded loops were introduced. So let's fix it by creating the ctx->offset[] correctly in the first place and account for the first instruction while calculating the arm instruction offsets. Fixes: 2589726 ("bpf: introduce bounded loops") Reported-by: Naresh Kamboju <[email protected]> Reported-by: Jiri Olsa <[email protected]> Co-developed-by: Jean-Philippe Brucker <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Jean-Philippe Brucker <[email protected]> Co-developed-by: Yauheni Kaliuta <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Yauheni Kaliuta <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Ilias Apalodimas <[email protected]> --- Changes since v1: - Added Co-developed-by, Reported-by and Fixes tags correctly - Describe the expected context of ctx->offset[] in comments arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 24, 2023
Christoph reported that the MPTCP protocol can find the subflow-level write queue unexpectedly not empty while crafting a zero-window probe, hitting a warning: ------------[ cut here ]------------ WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 188 at net/mptcp/protocol.c:1312 mptcp_sendmsg_frag+0xc06/0xe70 Modules linked in: CPU: 0 PID: 188 Comm: kworker/0:2 Not tainted 6.6.0-rc2-g1176aa719d7a #47 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.11.0-2.el7 04/01/2014 Workqueue: events mptcp_worker RIP: 0010:mptcp_sendmsg_frag+0xc06/0xe70 net/mptcp/protocol.c:1312 RAX: 47d0530de347ff6a RBX: 47d0530de347ff6b RCX: ffff8881015d3c00 RDX: ffff8881015d3c00 RSI: 47d0530de347ff6b RDI: 47d0530de347ff6b RBP: 47d0530de347ff6b R08: ffffffff8243c6a8 R09: ffffffff82042d9c R10: 0000000000000002 R11: ffffffff82056850 R12: ffff88812a13d580 R13: 0000000000000001 R14: ffff88812b375e50 R15: ffff88812bbf3200 FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88813bc00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 0000000000695118 CR3: 0000000115dfc001 CR4: 0000000000170ef0 Call Trace: <TASK> __subflow_push_pending+0xa4/0x420 net/mptcp/protocol.c:1545 __mptcp_push_pending+0x128/0x3b0 net/mptcp/protocol.c:1614 mptcp_release_cb+0x218/0x5b0 net/mptcp/protocol.c:3391 release_sock+0xf6/0x100 net/core/sock.c:3521 mptcp_worker+0x6e8/0x8f0 net/mptcp/protocol.c:2746 process_scheduled_works+0x341/0x690 kernel/workqueue.c:2630 worker_thread+0x3a7/0x610 kernel/workqueue.c:2784 kthread+0x143/0x180 kernel/kthread.c:388 ret_from_fork+0x4d/0x60 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:147 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1b/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:304 </TASK> The root cause of the issue is that expectations are wrong: e.g. due to MPTCP-level re-injection we can hit the critical condition. Explicitly avoid the zero-window probe when the subflow write queue is not empty and drop the related warnings. Reported-by: Christoph Paasch <[email protected]> Closes: multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next#444 Fixes: f70cad1 ("mptcp: stop relying on tcp_tx_skb_cache") Cc: [email protected] Reviewed-by: Mat Martineau <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Mat Martineau <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 26, 2024
The test_tag test triggers an unhandled page fault: # ./test_tag [ 130.640218] CPU 0 Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address ffff80001b898004, era == 9000000003137f7c, ra == 9000000003139e70 [ 130.640501] Oops[#3]: [ 130.640553] CPU: 0 PID: 1326 Comm: test_tag Tainted: G D O 6.7.0-rc4-loong-devel-gb62ab1a397cf #47 61985c1d94084daa2432f771daa45b56b10d8d2a [ 130.640764] Hardware name: QEMU QEMU Virtual Machine, BIOS unknown 2/2/2022 [ 130.640874] pc 9000000003137f7c ra 9000000003139e70 tp 9000000104cb4000 sp 9000000104cb7a40 [ 130.641001] a0 ffff80001b894000 a1 ffff80001b897ff8 a2 000000006ba210be a3 0000000000000000 [ 130.641128] a4 000000006ba210be a5 00000000000000f1 a6 00000000000000b3 a7 0000000000000000 [ 130.641256] t0 0000000000000000 t1 00000000000007f6 t2 0000000000000000 t3 9000000004091b70 [ 130.641387] t4 000000006ba210be t5 0000000000000004 t6 fffffffffffffff0 t7 90000000040913e0 [ 130.641512] t8 0000000000000005 u0 0000000000000dc0 s9 0000000000000009 s0 9000000104cb7ae0 [ 130.641641] s1 00000000000007f6 s2 0000000000000009 s3 0000000000000095 s4 0000000000000000 [ 130.641771] s5 ffff80001b894000 s6 ffff80001b897fb0 s7 9000000004090c50 s8 0000000000000000 [ 130.641900] ra: 9000000003139e70 build_body+0x1fcc/0x4988 [ 130.642007] ERA: 9000000003137f7c build_body+0xd8/0x4988 [ 130.642112] CRMD: 000000b0 (PLV0 -IE -DA +PG DACF=CC DACM=CC -WE) [ 130.642261] PRMD: 00000004 (PPLV0 +PIE -PWE) [ 130.642353] EUEN: 00000003 (+FPE +SXE -ASXE -BTE) [ 130.642458] ECFG: 00071c1c (LIE=2-4,10-12 VS=7) [ 130.642554] ESTAT: 00010000 [PIL] (IS= ECode=1 EsubCode=0) [ 130.642658] BADV: ffff80001b898004 [ 130.642719] PRID: 0014c010 (Loongson-64bit, Loongson-3A5000) [ 130.642815] Modules linked in: [last unloaded: bpf_testmod(O)] [ 130.642924] Process test_tag (pid: 1326, threadinfo=00000000f7f4015f, task=000000006499f9fd) [ 130.643062] Stack : 0000000000000000 9000000003380724 0000000000000000 0000000104cb7be8 [ 130.643213] 0000000000000000 25af8d9b6e600558 9000000106250ea0 9000000104cb7ae0 [ 130.643378] 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 9000000104cb7be8 90000000049f6000 [ 130.643538] 0000000000000090 9000000106250ea0 ffff80001b894000 ffff80001b894000 [ 130.643685] 00007ffffb917790 900000000313ca94 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 [ 130.643831] ffff80001b894000 0000000000000ff7 0000000000000000 9000000100468000 [ 130.643983] 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000040 25af8d9b6e600558 [ 130.644131] 0000000000000bb7 ffff80001b894048 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 [ 130.644276] 9000000104cb7be8 90000000049f6000 0000000000000090 9000000104cb7bdc [ 130.644423] ffff80001b894000 0000000000000000 00007ffffb917790 90000000032acfb0 [ 130.644572] ... [ 130.644629] Call Trace: [ 130.644641] [<9000000003137f7c>] build_body+0xd8/0x4988 [ 130.644785] [<900000000313ca94>] bpf_int_jit_compile+0x228/0x4ec [ 130.644891] [<90000000032acfb0>] bpf_prog_select_runtime+0x158/0x1b0 [ 130.645003] [<90000000032b3504>] bpf_prog_load+0x760/0xb44 [ 130.645089] [<90000000032b6744>] __sys_bpf+0xbb8/0x2588 [ 130.645175] [<90000000032b8388>] sys_bpf+0x20/0x2c [ 130.645259] [<9000000003f6ab38>] do_syscall+0x7c/0x94 [ 130.645369] [<9000000003121c5c>] handle_syscall+0xbc/0x158 [ 130.645507] [ 130.645539] Code: 380839f6 380831f9 28412bae <24000ca6> 004081ad 0014cb50 004083e8 02bff34c 58008e91 [ 130.645729] [ 130.646418] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]--- On my machine, which has CONFIG_PAGE_SIZE_16KB=y, the test failed at loading a BPF prog with 2039 instructions: prog = (struct bpf_prog *)ffff80001b894000 insn = (struct bpf_insn *)(prog->insnsi)ffff80001b894048 insn + 2039 = (struct bpf_insn *)ffff80001b898000 <- end of the page In the build_insn() function, we are trying to access next instruction unconditionally, i.e. `(insn + 1)->imm`. The address lies in the next page and can be not owned by the current process, thus an page fault is inevitable and then segfault. So, let's access next instruction only under `dst = imm64` context. With this fix, we have: # ./test_tag test_tag: OK (40945 tests) Fixes: bbfddb9 ("LoongArch: BPF: Avoid declare variables in switch-case") Tested-by: Tiezhu Yang <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Hengqi Chen <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Huacai Chen <[email protected]>
kuba-moo
pushed a commit
to linux-netdev/testing-bpf-ci
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 5, 2024
If e.g. the ata_port_alloc() call in ata_host_alloc() fails, we will jump to the err_out label, which will call devres_release_group(). devres_release_group() will trigger a call to ata_host_release(). ata_host_release() calls kfree(host), so executing the kfree(host) in ata_host_alloc() will lead to a double free: kernel BUG at mm/slub.c:553! Oops: invalid opcode: 0000 [kernel-patches#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPTI CPU: 11 PID: 599 Comm: (udev-worker) Not tainted 6.10.0-rc5 kernel-patches#47 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.16.3-2.fc40 04/01/2014 RIP: 0010:kfree+0x2cf/0x2f0 Code: 5d 41 5e 41 5f 5d e9 80 d6 ff ff 4d 89 f1 41 b8 01 00 00 00 48 89 d9 48 89 da RSP: 0018:ffffc90000f377f0 EFLAGS: 00010246 RAX: ffff888112b1f2c0 RBX: ffff888112b1f2c0 RCX: ffff888112b1f320 RDX: 000000000000400b RSI: ffffffffc02c9de5 RDI: ffff888112b1f2c0 RBP: ffffc90000f37830 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: ffffc90000f37610 R11: 617461203a736b6e R12: ffffea00044ac780 R13: ffff888100046400 R14: ffffffffc02c9de5 R15: 0000000000000006 FS: 00007f2f1cabe980(0000) GS:ffff88813b380000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00007f2f1c3acf75 CR3: 0000000111724000 CR4: 0000000000750ef0 PKRU: 55555554 Call Trace: <TASK> ? __die_body.cold+0x19/0x27 ? die+0x2e/0x50 ? do_trap+0xca/0x110 ? do_error_trap+0x6a/0x90 ? kfree+0x2cf/0x2f0 ? exc_invalid_op+0x50/0x70 ? kfree+0x2cf/0x2f0 ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x1a/0x20 ? ata_host_alloc+0xf5/0x120 [libata] ? ata_host_alloc+0xf5/0x120 [libata] ? kfree+0x2cf/0x2f0 ata_host_alloc+0xf5/0x120 [libata] ata_host_alloc_pinfo+0x14/0xa0 [libata] ahci_init_one+0x6c9/0xd20 [ahci] Ensure that we will not call kfree(host) twice, by performing the kfree() only if the devres_open_group() call failed. Fixes: dafd6c4 ("libata: ensure host is free'd on error exit paths") Cc: [email protected] Reviewed-by: Damien Le Moal <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Niklas Cassel <[email protected]>
kuba-moo
pushed a commit
to linux-netdev/testing-bpf-ci
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 25, 2025
A use-after-free error popped up in stress testing: [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] BUG: KFENCE: use-after-free write in pdsc_auxbus_dev_del+0xef/0x160 [pds_core] [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] Use-after-free write at 0x000000007013ecd1 (in kfence-kernel-patches#47): [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] pdsc_auxbus_dev_del+0xef/0x160 [pds_core] [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] pdsc_remove+0xc0/0x1b0 [pds_core] [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] pci_device_remove+0x24/0x70 [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] device_release_driver_internal+0x11f/0x180 [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] driver_detach+0x45/0x80 [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] bus_remove_driver+0x83/0xe0 [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] pci_unregister_driver+0x1a/0x80 The actual device uninit usually happens on a separate thread scheduled after this code runs, but there is no guarantee of order of thread execution, so this could be a problem. There's no actual need to clear the client_id at this point, so simply remove the offending code. Fixes: 1065903 ("pds_core: add the aux client API") Signed-off-by: Shannon Nelson <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: NipaLocal <nipa@local>
kuba-moo
pushed a commit
to linux-netdev/testing-bpf-ci
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 26, 2025
A use-after-free error popped up in stress testing: [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] BUG: KFENCE: use-after-free write in pdsc_auxbus_dev_del+0xef/0x160 [pds_core] [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] Use-after-free write at 0x000000007013ecd1 (in kfence-kernel-patches#47): [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] pdsc_auxbus_dev_del+0xef/0x160 [pds_core] [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] pdsc_remove+0xc0/0x1b0 [pds_core] [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] pci_device_remove+0x24/0x70 [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] device_release_driver_internal+0x11f/0x180 [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] driver_detach+0x45/0x80 [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] bus_remove_driver+0x83/0xe0 [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] pci_unregister_driver+0x1a/0x80 The actual device uninit usually happens on a separate thread scheduled after this code runs, but there is no guarantee of order of thread execution, so this could be a problem. There's no actual need to clear the client_id at this point, so simply remove the offending code. Fixes: 1065903 ("pds_core: add the aux client API") Signed-off-by: Shannon Nelson <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: NipaLocal <nipa@local>
kuba-moo
pushed a commit
to linux-netdev/testing-bpf-ci
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 26, 2025
A use-after-free error popped up in stress testing: [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] BUG: KFENCE: use-after-free write in pdsc_auxbus_dev_del+0xef/0x160 [pds_core] [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] Use-after-free write at 0x000000007013ecd1 (in kfence-kernel-patches#47): [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] pdsc_auxbus_dev_del+0xef/0x160 [pds_core] [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] pdsc_remove+0xc0/0x1b0 [pds_core] [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] pci_device_remove+0x24/0x70 [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] device_release_driver_internal+0x11f/0x180 [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] driver_detach+0x45/0x80 [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] bus_remove_driver+0x83/0xe0 [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] pci_unregister_driver+0x1a/0x80 The actual device uninit usually happens on a separate thread scheduled after this code runs, but there is no guarantee of order of thread execution, so this could be a problem. There's no actual need to clear the client_id at this point, so simply remove the offending code. Fixes: 1065903 ("pds_core: add the aux client API") Signed-off-by: Shannon Nelson <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: NipaLocal <nipa@local>
kuba-moo
pushed a commit
to linux-netdev/testing-bpf-ci
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 26, 2025
A use-after-free error popped up in stress testing: [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] BUG: KFENCE: use-after-free write in pdsc_auxbus_dev_del+0xef/0x160 [pds_core] [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] Use-after-free write at 0x000000007013ecd1 (in kfence-kernel-patches#47): [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] pdsc_auxbus_dev_del+0xef/0x160 [pds_core] [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] pdsc_remove+0xc0/0x1b0 [pds_core] [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] pci_device_remove+0x24/0x70 [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] device_release_driver_internal+0x11f/0x180 [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] driver_detach+0x45/0x80 [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] bus_remove_driver+0x83/0xe0 [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] pci_unregister_driver+0x1a/0x80 The actual device uninit usually happens on a separate thread scheduled after this code runs, but there is no guarantee of order of thread execution, so this could be a problem. There's no actual need to clear the client_id at this point, so simply remove the offending code. Fixes: 1065903 ("pds_core: add the aux client API") Signed-off-by: Shannon Nelson <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: NipaLocal <nipa@local>
kuba-moo
pushed a commit
to linux-netdev/testing-bpf-ci
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 26, 2025
A use-after-free error popped up in stress testing: [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] BUG: KFENCE: use-after-free write in pdsc_auxbus_dev_del+0xef/0x160 [pds_core] [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] Use-after-free write at 0x000000007013ecd1 (in kfence-kernel-patches#47): [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] pdsc_auxbus_dev_del+0xef/0x160 [pds_core] [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] pdsc_remove+0xc0/0x1b0 [pds_core] [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] pci_device_remove+0x24/0x70 [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] device_release_driver_internal+0x11f/0x180 [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] driver_detach+0x45/0x80 [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] bus_remove_driver+0x83/0xe0 [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] pci_unregister_driver+0x1a/0x80 The actual device uninit usually happens on a separate thread scheduled after this code runs, but there is no guarantee of order of thread execution, so this could be a problem. There's no actual need to clear the client_id at this point, so simply remove the offending code. Fixes: 1065903 ("pds_core: add the aux client API") Signed-off-by: Shannon Nelson <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: NipaLocal <nipa@local>
kuba-moo
pushed a commit
to linux-netdev/testing-bpf-ci
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 26, 2025
A use-after-free error popped up in stress testing: [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] BUG: KFENCE: use-after-free write in pdsc_auxbus_dev_del+0xef/0x160 [pds_core] [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] Use-after-free write at 0x000000007013ecd1 (in kfence-kernel-patches#47): [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] pdsc_auxbus_dev_del+0xef/0x160 [pds_core] [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] pdsc_remove+0xc0/0x1b0 [pds_core] [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] pci_device_remove+0x24/0x70 [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] device_release_driver_internal+0x11f/0x180 [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] driver_detach+0x45/0x80 [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] bus_remove_driver+0x83/0xe0 [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] pci_unregister_driver+0x1a/0x80 The actual device uninit usually happens on a separate thread scheduled after this code runs, but there is no guarantee of order of thread execution, so this could be a problem. There's no actual need to clear the client_id at this point, so simply remove the offending code. Fixes: 1065903 ("pds_core: add the aux client API") Signed-off-by: Shannon Nelson <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: NipaLocal <nipa@local>
kuba-moo
pushed a commit
to linux-netdev/testing-bpf-ci
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 26, 2025
A use-after-free error popped up in stress testing: [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] BUG: KFENCE: use-after-free write in pdsc_auxbus_dev_del+0xef/0x160 [pds_core] [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] Use-after-free write at 0x000000007013ecd1 (in kfence-kernel-patches#47): [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] pdsc_auxbus_dev_del+0xef/0x160 [pds_core] [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] pdsc_remove+0xc0/0x1b0 [pds_core] [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] pci_device_remove+0x24/0x70 [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] device_release_driver_internal+0x11f/0x180 [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] driver_detach+0x45/0x80 [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] bus_remove_driver+0x83/0xe0 [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] pci_unregister_driver+0x1a/0x80 The actual device uninit usually happens on a separate thread scheduled after this code runs, but there is no guarantee of order of thread execution, so this could be a problem. There's no actual need to clear the client_id at this point, so simply remove the offending code. Fixes: 1065903 ("pds_core: add the aux client API") Signed-off-by: Shannon Nelson <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: NipaLocal <nipa@local>
kuba-moo
pushed a commit
to linux-netdev/testing-bpf-ci
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 26, 2025
A use-after-free error popped up in stress testing: [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] BUG: KFENCE: use-after-free write in pdsc_auxbus_dev_del+0xef/0x160 [pds_core] [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] Use-after-free write at 0x000000007013ecd1 (in kfence-kernel-patches#47): [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] pdsc_auxbus_dev_del+0xef/0x160 [pds_core] [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] pdsc_remove+0xc0/0x1b0 [pds_core] [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] pci_device_remove+0x24/0x70 [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] device_release_driver_internal+0x11f/0x180 [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] driver_detach+0x45/0x80 [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] bus_remove_driver+0x83/0xe0 [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] pci_unregister_driver+0x1a/0x80 The actual device uninit usually happens on a separate thread scheduled after this code runs, but there is no guarantee of order of thread execution, so this could be a problem. There's no actual need to clear the client_id at this point, so simply remove the offending code. Fixes: 1065903 ("pds_core: add the aux client API") Signed-off-by: Shannon Nelson <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: NipaLocal <nipa@local>
kuba-moo
pushed a commit
to linux-netdev/testing-bpf-ci
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 26, 2025
A use-after-free error popped up in stress testing: [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] BUG: KFENCE: use-after-free write in pdsc_auxbus_dev_del+0xef/0x160 [pds_core] [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] Use-after-free write at 0x000000007013ecd1 (in kfence-kernel-patches#47): [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] pdsc_auxbus_dev_del+0xef/0x160 [pds_core] [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] pdsc_remove+0xc0/0x1b0 [pds_core] [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] pci_device_remove+0x24/0x70 [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] device_release_driver_internal+0x11f/0x180 [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] driver_detach+0x45/0x80 [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] bus_remove_driver+0x83/0xe0 [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] pci_unregister_driver+0x1a/0x80 The actual device uninit usually happens on a separate thread scheduled after this code runs, but there is no guarantee of order of thread execution, so this could be a problem. There's no actual need to clear the client_id at this point, so simply remove the offending code. Fixes: 1065903 ("pds_core: add the aux client API") Signed-off-by: Shannon Nelson <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: NipaLocal <nipa@local>
kuba-moo
pushed a commit
to linux-netdev/testing-bpf-ci
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 27, 2025
A use-after-free error popped up in stress testing: [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] BUG: KFENCE: use-after-free write in pdsc_auxbus_dev_del+0xef/0x160 [pds_core] [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] Use-after-free write at 0x000000007013ecd1 (in kfence-kernel-patches#47): [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] pdsc_auxbus_dev_del+0xef/0x160 [pds_core] [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] pdsc_remove+0xc0/0x1b0 [pds_core] [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] pci_device_remove+0x24/0x70 [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] device_release_driver_internal+0x11f/0x180 [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] driver_detach+0x45/0x80 [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] bus_remove_driver+0x83/0xe0 [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] pci_unregister_driver+0x1a/0x80 The actual device uninit usually happens on a separate thread scheduled after this code runs, but there is no guarantee of order of thread execution, so this could be a problem. There's no actual need to clear the client_id at this point, so simply remove the offending code. Fixes: 1065903 ("pds_core: add the aux client API") Signed-off-by: Shannon Nelson <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: NipaLocal <nipa@local>
kuba-moo
pushed a commit
to linux-netdev/testing-bpf-ci
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 27, 2025
A use-after-free error popped up in stress testing: [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] BUG: KFENCE: use-after-free write in pdsc_auxbus_dev_del+0xef/0x160 [pds_core] [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] Use-after-free write at 0x000000007013ecd1 (in kfence-kernel-patches#47): [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] pdsc_auxbus_dev_del+0xef/0x160 [pds_core] [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] pdsc_remove+0xc0/0x1b0 [pds_core] [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] pci_device_remove+0x24/0x70 [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] device_release_driver_internal+0x11f/0x180 [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] driver_detach+0x45/0x80 [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] bus_remove_driver+0x83/0xe0 [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] pci_unregister_driver+0x1a/0x80 The actual device uninit usually happens on a separate thread scheduled after this code runs, but there is no guarantee of order of thread execution, so this could be a problem. There's no actual need to clear the client_id at this point, so simply remove the offending code. Fixes: 1065903 ("pds_core: add the aux client API") Signed-off-by: Shannon Nelson <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: NipaLocal <nipa@local>
kuba-moo
pushed a commit
to linux-netdev/testing-bpf-ci
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 27, 2025
A use-after-free error popped up in stress testing: [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] BUG: KFENCE: use-after-free write in pdsc_auxbus_dev_del+0xef/0x160 [pds_core] [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] Use-after-free write at 0x000000007013ecd1 (in kfence-kernel-patches#47): [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] pdsc_auxbus_dev_del+0xef/0x160 [pds_core] [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] pdsc_remove+0xc0/0x1b0 [pds_core] [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] pci_device_remove+0x24/0x70 [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] device_release_driver_internal+0x11f/0x180 [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] driver_detach+0x45/0x80 [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] bus_remove_driver+0x83/0xe0 [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] pci_unregister_driver+0x1a/0x80 The actual device uninit usually happens on a separate thread scheduled after this code runs, but there is no guarantee of order of thread execution, so this could be a problem. There's no actual need to clear the client_id at this point, so simply remove the offending code. Fixes: 1065903 ("pds_core: add the aux client API") Signed-off-by: Shannon Nelson <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: NipaLocal <nipa@local>
kuba-moo
pushed a commit
to linux-netdev/testing-bpf-ci
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 27, 2025
A use-after-free error popped up in stress testing: [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] BUG: KFENCE: use-after-free write in pdsc_auxbus_dev_del+0xef/0x160 [pds_core] [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] Use-after-free write at 0x000000007013ecd1 (in kfence-kernel-patches#47): [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] pdsc_auxbus_dev_del+0xef/0x160 [pds_core] [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] pdsc_remove+0xc0/0x1b0 [pds_core] [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] pci_device_remove+0x24/0x70 [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] device_release_driver_internal+0x11f/0x180 [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] driver_detach+0x45/0x80 [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] bus_remove_driver+0x83/0xe0 [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] pci_unregister_driver+0x1a/0x80 The actual device uninit usually happens on a separate thread scheduled after this code runs, but there is no guarantee of order of thread execution, so this could be a problem. There's no actual need to clear the client_id at this point, so simply remove the offending code. Fixes: 1065903 ("pds_core: add the aux client API") Signed-off-by: Shannon Nelson <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: NipaLocal <nipa@local>
kuba-moo
pushed a commit
to linux-netdev/testing-bpf-ci
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 27, 2025
A use-after-free error popped up in stress testing: [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] BUG: KFENCE: use-after-free write in pdsc_auxbus_dev_del+0xef/0x160 [pds_core] [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] Use-after-free write at 0x000000007013ecd1 (in kfence-kernel-patches#47): [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] pdsc_auxbus_dev_del+0xef/0x160 [pds_core] [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] pdsc_remove+0xc0/0x1b0 [pds_core] [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] pci_device_remove+0x24/0x70 [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] device_release_driver_internal+0x11f/0x180 [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] driver_detach+0x45/0x80 [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] bus_remove_driver+0x83/0xe0 [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] pci_unregister_driver+0x1a/0x80 The actual device uninit usually happens on a separate thread scheduled after this code runs, but there is no guarantee of order of thread execution, so this could be a problem. There's no actual need to clear the client_id at this point, so simply remove the offending code. Fixes: 1065903 ("pds_core: add the aux client API") Signed-off-by: Shannon Nelson <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: NipaLocal <nipa@local>
kuba-moo
pushed a commit
to linux-netdev/testing-bpf-ci
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 27, 2025
A use-after-free error popped up in stress testing: [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] BUG: KFENCE: use-after-free write in pdsc_auxbus_dev_del+0xef/0x160 [pds_core] [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] Use-after-free write at 0x000000007013ecd1 (in kfence-kernel-patches#47): [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] pdsc_auxbus_dev_del+0xef/0x160 [pds_core] [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] pdsc_remove+0xc0/0x1b0 [pds_core] [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] pci_device_remove+0x24/0x70 [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] device_release_driver_internal+0x11f/0x180 [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] driver_detach+0x45/0x80 [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] bus_remove_driver+0x83/0xe0 [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] pci_unregister_driver+0x1a/0x80 The actual device uninit usually happens on a separate thread scheduled after this code runs, but there is no guarantee of order of thread execution, so this could be a problem. There's no actual need to clear the client_id at this point, so simply remove the offending code. Fixes: 1065903 ("pds_core: add the aux client API") Signed-off-by: Shannon Nelson <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: NipaLocal <nipa@local>
kuba-moo
pushed a commit
to linux-netdev/testing-bpf-ci
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 27, 2025
A use-after-free error popped up in stress testing: [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] BUG: KFENCE: use-after-free write in pdsc_auxbus_dev_del+0xef/0x160 [pds_core] [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] Use-after-free write at 0x000000007013ecd1 (in kfence-kernel-patches#47): [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] pdsc_auxbus_dev_del+0xef/0x160 [pds_core] [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] pdsc_remove+0xc0/0x1b0 [pds_core] [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] pci_device_remove+0x24/0x70 [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] device_release_driver_internal+0x11f/0x180 [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] driver_detach+0x45/0x80 [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] bus_remove_driver+0x83/0xe0 [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] pci_unregister_driver+0x1a/0x80 The actual device uninit usually happens on a separate thread scheduled after this code runs, but there is no guarantee of order of thread execution, so this could be a problem. There's no actual need to clear the client_id at this point, so simply remove the offending code. Fixes: 1065903 ("pds_core: add the aux client API") Signed-off-by: Shannon Nelson <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: NipaLocal <nipa@local>
kuba-moo
pushed a commit
to linux-netdev/testing-bpf-ci
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 27, 2025
A use-after-free error popped up in stress testing: [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] BUG: KFENCE: use-after-free write in pdsc_auxbus_dev_del+0xef/0x160 [pds_core] [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] Use-after-free write at 0x000000007013ecd1 (in kfence-kernel-patches#47): [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] pdsc_auxbus_dev_del+0xef/0x160 [pds_core] [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] pdsc_remove+0xc0/0x1b0 [pds_core] [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] pci_device_remove+0x24/0x70 [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] device_release_driver_internal+0x11f/0x180 [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] driver_detach+0x45/0x80 [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] bus_remove_driver+0x83/0xe0 [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] pci_unregister_driver+0x1a/0x80 The actual device uninit usually happens on a separate thread scheduled after this code runs, but there is no guarantee of order of thread execution, so this could be a problem. There's no actual need to clear the client_id at this point, so simply remove the offending code. Fixes: 1065903 ("pds_core: add the aux client API") Signed-off-by: Shannon Nelson <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: NipaLocal <nipa@local>
kuba-moo
pushed a commit
to linux-netdev/testing-bpf-ci
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 28, 2025
A use-after-free error popped up in stress testing: [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] BUG: KFENCE: use-after-free write in pdsc_auxbus_dev_del+0xef/0x160 [pds_core] [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] Use-after-free write at 0x000000007013ecd1 (in kfence-kernel-patches#47): [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] pdsc_auxbus_dev_del+0xef/0x160 [pds_core] [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] pdsc_remove+0xc0/0x1b0 [pds_core] [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] pci_device_remove+0x24/0x70 [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] device_release_driver_internal+0x11f/0x180 [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] driver_detach+0x45/0x80 [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] bus_remove_driver+0x83/0xe0 [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] pci_unregister_driver+0x1a/0x80 The actual device uninit usually happens on a separate thread scheduled after this code runs, but there is no guarantee of order of thread execution, so this could be a problem. There's no actual need to clear the client_id at this point, so simply remove the offending code. Fixes: 1065903 ("pds_core: add the aux client API") Signed-off-by: Shannon Nelson <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: NipaLocal <nipa@local>
kuba-moo
pushed a commit
to linux-netdev/testing-bpf-ci
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 28, 2025
A use-after-free error popped up in stress testing: [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] BUG: KFENCE: use-after-free write in pdsc_auxbus_dev_del+0xef/0x160 [pds_core] [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] Use-after-free write at 0x000000007013ecd1 (in kfence-kernel-patches#47): [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] pdsc_auxbus_dev_del+0xef/0x160 [pds_core] [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] pdsc_remove+0xc0/0x1b0 [pds_core] [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] pci_device_remove+0x24/0x70 [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] device_release_driver_internal+0x11f/0x180 [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] driver_detach+0x45/0x80 [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] bus_remove_driver+0x83/0xe0 [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] pci_unregister_driver+0x1a/0x80 The actual device uninit usually happens on a separate thread scheduled after this code runs, but there is no guarantee of order of thread execution, so this could be a problem. There's no actual need to clear the client_id at this point, so simply remove the offending code. Fixes: 1065903 ("pds_core: add the aux client API") Signed-off-by: Shannon Nelson <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: NipaLocal <nipa@local>
kuba-moo
pushed a commit
to linux-netdev/testing-bpf-ci
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 28, 2025
A use-after-free error popped up in stress testing: [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] BUG: KFENCE: use-after-free write in pdsc_auxbus_dev_del+0xef/0x160 [pds_core] [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] Use-after-free write at 0x000000007013ecd1 (in kfence-kernel-patches#47): [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] pdsc_auxbus_dev_del+0xef/0x160 [pds_core] [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] pdsc_remove+0xc0/0x1b0 [pds_core] [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] pci_device_remove+0x24/0x70 [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] device_release_driver_internal+0x11f/0x180 [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] driver_detach+0x45/0x80 [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] bus_remove_driver+0x83/0xe0 [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] pci_unregister_driver+0x1a/0x80 The actual device uninit usually happens on a separate thread scheduled after this code runs, but there is no guarantee of order of thread execution, so this could be a problem. There's no actual need to clear the client_id at this point, so simply remove the offending code. Fixes: 1065903 ("pds_core: add the aux client API") Signed-off-by: Shannon Nelson <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: NipaLocal <nipa@local>
kuba-moo
pushed a commit
to linux-netdev/testing-bpf-ci
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 28, 2025
A use-after-free error popped up in stress testing: [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] BUG: KFENCE: use-after-free write in pdsc_auxbus_dev_del+0xef/0x160 [pds_core] [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] Use-after-free write at 0x000000007013ecd1 (in kfence-kernel-patches#47): [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] pdsc_auxbus_dev_del+0xef/0x160 [pds_core] [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] pdsc_remove+0xc0/0x1b0 [pds_core] [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] pci_device_remove+0x24/0x70 [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] device_release_driver_internal+0x11f/0x180 [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] driver_detach+0x45/0x80 [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] bus_remove_driver+0x83/0xe0 [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] pci_unregister_driver+0x1a/0x80 The actual device uninit usually happens on a separate thread scheduled after this code runs, but there is no guarantee of order of thread execution, so this could be a problem. There's no actual need to clear the client_id at this point, so simply remove the offending code. Fixes: 1065903 ("pds_core: add the aux client API") Signed-off-by: Shannon Nelson <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: NipaLocal <nipa@local>
kuba-moo
pushed a commit
to linux-netdev/testing-bpf-ci
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 28, 2025
A use-after-free error popped up in stress testing: [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] BUG: KFENCE: use-after-free write in pdsc_auxbus_dev_del+0xef/0x160 [pds_core] [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] Use-after-free write at 0x000000007013ecd1 (in kfence-kernel-patches#47): [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] pdsc_auxbus_dev_del+0xef/0x160 [pds_core] [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] pdsc_remove+0xc0/0x1b0 [pds_core] [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] pci_device_remove+0x24/0x70 [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] device_release_driver_internal+0x11f/0x180 [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] driver_detach+0x45/0x80 [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] bus_remove_driver+0x83/0xe0 [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] pci_unregister_driver+0x1a/0x80 The actual device uninit usually happens on a separate thread scheduled after this code runs, but there is no guarantee of order of thread execution, so this could be a problem. There's no actual need to clear the client_id at this point, so simply remove the offending code. Fixes: 1065903 ("pds_core: add the aux client API") Signed-off-by: Shannon Nelson <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: NipaLocal <nipa@local>
kuba-moo
pushed a commit
to linux-netdev/testing-bpf-ci
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 28, 2025
A use-after-free error popped up in stress testing: [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] BUG: KFENCE: use-after-free write in pdsc_auxbus_dev_del+0xef/0x160 [pds_core] [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] Use-after-free write at 0x000000007013ecd1 (in kfence-kernel-patches#47): [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] pdsc_auxbus_dev_del+0xef/0x160 [pds_core] [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] pdsc_remove+0xc0/0x1b0 [pds_core] [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] pci_device_remove+0x24/0x70 [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] device_release_driver_internal+0x11f/0x180 [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] driver_detach+0x45/0x80 [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] bus_remove_driver+0x83/0xe0 [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] pci_unregister_driver+0x1a/0x80 The actual device uninit usually happens on a separate thread scheduled after this code runs, but there is no guarantee of order of thread execution, so this could be a problem. There's no actual need to clear the client_id at this point, so simply remove the offending code. Fixes: 1065903 ("pds_core: add the aux client API") Signed-off-by: Shannon Nelson <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: NipaLocal <nipa@local>
kuba-moo
pushed a commit
to linux-netdev/testing-bpf-ci
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 28, 2025
A use-after-free error popped up in stress testing: [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] BUG: KFENCE: use-after-free write in pdsc_auxbus_dev_del+0xef/0x160 [pds_core] [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] Use-after-free write at 0x000000007013ecd1 (in kfence-kernel-patches#47): [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] pdsc_auxbus_dev_del+0xef/0x160 [pds_core] [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] pdsc_remove+0xc0/0x1b0 [pds_core] [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] pci_device_remove+0x24/0x70 [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] device_release_driver_internal+0x11f/0x180 [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] driver_detach+0x45/0x80 [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] bus_remove_driver+0x83/0xe0 [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] pci_unregister_driver+0x1a/0x80 The actual device uninit usually happens on a separate thread scheduled after this code runs, but there is no guarantee of order of thread execution, so this could be a problem. There's no actual need to clear the client_id at this point, so simply remove the offending code. Fixes: 1065903 ("pds_core: add the aux client API") Signed-off-by: Shannon Nelson <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: NipaLocal <nipa@local>
kuba-moo
pushed a commit
to linux-netdev/testing-bpf-ci
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 28, 2025
A use-after-free error popped up in stress testing: [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] BUG: KFENCE: use-after-free write in pdsc_auxbus_dev_del+0xef/0x160 [pds_core] [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] Use-after-free write at 0x000000007013ecd1 (in kfence-kernel-patches#47): [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] pdsc_auxbus_dev_del+0xef/0x160 [pds_core] [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] pdsc_remove+0xc0/0x1b0 [pds_core] [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] pci_device_remove+0x24/0x70 [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] device_release_driver_internal+0x11f/0x180 [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] driver_detach+0x45/0x80 [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] bus_remove_driver+0x83/0xe0 [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] pci_unregister_driver+0x1a/0x80 The actual device uninit usually happens on a separate thread scheduled after this code runs, but there is no guarantee of order of thread execution, so this could be a problem. There's no actual need to clear the client_id at this point, so simply remove the offending code. Fixes: 1065903 ("pds_core: add the aux client API") Signed-off-by: Shannon Nelson <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: NipaLocal <nipa@local>
kuba-moo
pushed a commit
to linux-netdev/testing-bpf-ci
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 29, 2025
A use-after-free error popped up in stress testing: [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] BUG: KFENCE: use-after-free write in pdsc_auxbus_dev_del+0xef/0x160 [pds_core] [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] Use-after-free write at 0x000000007013ecd1 (in kfence-kernel-patches#47): [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] pdsc_auxbus_dev_del+0xef/0x160 [pds_core] [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] pdsc_remove+0xc0/0x1b0 [pds_core] [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] pci_device_remove+0x24/0x70 [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] device_release_driver_internal+0x11f/0x180 [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] driver_detach+0x45/0x80 [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] bus_remove_driver+0x83/0xe0 [Mon Apr 21 21:21:33 2025] pci_unregister_driver+0x1a/0x80 The actual device uninit usually happens on a separate thread scheduled after this code runs, but there is no guarantee of order of thread execution, so this could be a problem. There's no actual need to clear the client_id at this point, so simply remove the offending code. Fixes: 1065903 ("pds_core: add the aux client API") Signed-off-by: Shannon Nelson <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <[email protected]> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]>
kuba-moo
pushed a commit
to linux-netdev/testing-bpf-ci
that referenced
this pull request
May 8, 2025
btrfs_prelim_ref() calls the old and new reference variables in the incorrect order. This causes a NULL pointer dereference because oldref is passed as NULL to trace_btrfs_prelim_ref_insert(). Note, trace_btrfs_prelim_ref_insert() is being called with newref as oldref (and oldref as NULL) on purpose in order to print out the values of newref. To reproduce: echo 1 > /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/events/btrfs/btrfs_prelim_ref_insert/enable Perform some writeback operations. Backtrace: BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000018 #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page PGD 115949067 P4D 115949067 PUD 11594a067 PMD 0 Oops: Oops: 0000 [kernel-patches#1] SMP NOPTI CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 1188 Comm: fsstress Not tainted 6.15.0-rc2-tester+ kernel-patches#47 PREEMPT(voluntary) 7ca2cef72d5e9c600f0c7718adb6462de8149622 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS rel-1.16.3-2-gc13ff2cd-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 RIP: 0010:trace_event_raw_event_btrfs__prelim_ref+0x72/0x130 Code: e8 43 81 9f ff 48 85 c0 74 78 4d 85 e4 0f 84 8f 00 00 00 49 8b 94 24 c0 06 00 00 48 8b 0a 48 89 48 08 48 8b 52 08 48 89 50 10 <49> 8b 55 18 48 89 50 18 49 8b 55 20 48 89 50 20 41 0f b6 55 28 88 RSP: 0018:ffffce44820077a0 EFLAGS: 00010286 RAX: ffff8c6b403f9014 RBX: ffff8c6b55825730 RCX: 304994edf9cf506b RDX: d8b11eb7f0fdb699 RSI: ffff8c6b403f9010 RDI: ffff8c6b403f9010 RBP: 0000000000000001 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000000010 R10: 00000000ffffffff R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffff8c6b4e8fb000 R13: 0000000000000000 R14: ffffce44820077a8 R15: ffff8c6b4abd1540 FS: 00007f4dc6813740(0000) GS:ffff8c6c1d378000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 0000000000000018 CR3: 000000010eb42000 CR4: 0000000000750ef0 PKRU: 55555554 Call Trace: <TASK> prelim_ref_insert+0x1c1/0x270 find_parent_nodes+0x12a6/0x1ee0 ? __entry_text_end+0x101f06/0x101f09 ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 btrfs_is_data_extent_shared+0x167/0x640 ? fiemap_process_hole+0xd0/0x2c0 extent_fiemap+0xa5c/0xbc0 ? __entry_text_end+0x101f05/0x101f09 btrfs_fiemap+0x7e/0xd0 do_vfs_ioctl+0x425/0x9d0 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x75/0xc0 Signed-off-by: Goldwyn Rodrigues <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Pull request for series with
subject: bpf: Support multi-attach for freplace programs
version: 3
url: https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/netdev/list/?series=201109