Skip to content

bpf: Fix the irq and nmi check in bpf_sk_storage for tracing usage #356

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

kernel-patches-bot
Copy link

Pull request for series with
subject: bpf: Fix the irq and nmi check in bpf_sk_storage for tracing usage
version: 1
url: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/list/?series=385417

kernel-patches-bot and others added 2 commits November 16, 2020 12:10
The intention of the current check is to avoid using bpf_sk_storage
in irq and nmi.  Jakub pointed out that the current check cannot
do that.  For example, in_serving_softirq() returns true
if the softirq handling is interrupted by hard irq.

Fixes: 8e4597c ("bpf: Allow using bpf_sk_storage in FENTRY/FEXIT/RAW_TP")
Suggested-by: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <[email protected]>
@kernel-patches-bot
Copy link
Author

Master branch: 024cd2c
series: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/list/?series=385417
version: 1

@kernel-patches-bot
Copy link
Author

At least one diff in series https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/list/?series=385417 irrelevant now. Closing PR.

@kernel-patches-bot kernel-patches-bot deleted the series/385417=>bpf-next branch November 17, 2020 01:06
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 27, 2023
With latest upstream llvm18, the following test cases failed:
  $ ./test_progs -j
  #13/2    bpf_cookie/multi_kprobe_link_api:FAIL
  #13/3    bpf_cookie/multi_kprobe_attach_api:FAIL
  #13      bpf_cookie:FAIL
  #77      fentry_fexit:FAIL
  #78/1    fentry_test/fentry:FAIL
  #78      fentry_test:FAIL
  #82/1    fexit_test/fexit:FAIL
  #82      fexit_test:FAIL
  #112/1   kprobe_multi_test/skel_api:FAIL
  #112/2   kprobe_multi_test/link_api_addrs:FAIL
  ...
  #112     kprobe_multi_test:FAIL
  #356/17  test_global_funcs/global_func17:FAIL
  #356     test_global_funcs:FAIL

Further analysis shows llvm upstream patch [1] is responsible
for the above failures. For example, for function bpf_fentry_test7()
in net/bpf/test_run.c, without [1], the asm code is:
  0000000000000400 <bpf_fentry_test7>:
     400: f3 0f 1e fa                   endbr64
     404: e8 00 00 00 00                callq   0x409 <bpf_fentry_test7+0x9>
     409: 48 89 f8                      movq    %rdi, %rax
     40c: c3                            retq
     40d: 0f 1f 00                      nopl    (%rax)
and with [1], the asm code is:
  0000000000005d20 <bpf_fentry_test7.specialized.1>:
    5d20: e8 00 00 00 00                callq   0x5d25 <bpf_fentry_test7.specialized.1+0x5>
    5d25: c3                            retq
and <bpf_fentry_test7.specialized.1> is called instead of <bpf_fentry_test7>
and this caused test failures for #13/#77 etc. except #356.

For test case #356/17, with [1] (progs/test_global_func17.c)),
the main prog looks like:
  0000000000000000 <global_func17>:
       0:       b4 00 00 00 2a 00 00 00 w0 = 0x2a
       1:       95 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 exit
which passed verification while the test itself expects a verification
failure.

Let us add 'barrier_var' style asm code in both places to prevent
function specialization which caused selftests failure.

  [1] llvm/llvm-project#72903

Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <[email protected]>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 27, 2023
With latest upstream llvm18, the following test cases failed:

  $ ./test_progs -j
  #13/2    bpf_cookie/multi_kprobe_link_api:FAIL
  #13/3    bpf_cookie/multi_kprobe_attach_api:FAIL
  #13      bpf_cookie:FAIL
  #77      fentry_fexit:FAIL
  #78/1    fentry_test/fentry:FAIL
  #78      fentry_test:FAIL
  #82/1    fexit_test/fexit:FAIL
  #82      fexit_test:FAIL
  #112/1   kprobe_multi_test/skel_api:FAIL
  #112/2   kprobe_multi_test/link_api_addrs:FAIL
  [...]
  #112     kprobe_multi_test:FAIL
  #356/17  test_global_funcs/global_func17:FAIL
  #356     test_global_funcs:FAIL

Further analysis shows llvm upstream patch [1] is responsible for the above
failures. For example, for function bpf_fentry_test7() in net/bpf/test_run.c,
without [1], the asm code is:

  0000000000000400 <bpf_fentry_test7>:
     400: f3 0f 1e fa                   endbr64
     404: e8 00 00 00 00                callq   0x409 <bpf_fentry_test7+0x9>
     409: 48 89 f8                      movq    %rdi, %rax
     40c: c3                            retq
     40d: 0f 1f 00                      nopl    (%rax)

... and with [1], the asm code is:

  0000000000005d20 <bpf_fentry_test7.specialized.1>:
    5d20: e8 00 00 00 00                callq   0x5d25 <bpf_fentry_test7.specialized.1+0x5>
    5d25: c3                            retq

... and <bpf_fentry_test7.specialized.1> is called instead of <bpf_fentry_test7>
and this caused test failures for #13/#77 etc. except #356.

For test case #356/17, with [1] (progs/test_global_func17.c)), the main prog
looks like:

  0000000000000000 <global_func17>:
       0:       b4 00 00 00 2a 00 00 00 w0 = 0x2a
       1:       95 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 exit

... which passed verification while the test itself expects a verification
failure.

Let us add 'barrier_var' style asm code in both places to prevent function
specialization which caused selftests failure.

  [1] llvm/llvm-project#72903

Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 5, 2024
KASAN reports that the GPU metrics table allocated in
vangogh_tables_init() is not large enough for the memset done in
smu_cmn_init_soft_gpu_metrics(). Condensed report follows:

[   33.861314] BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in smu_cmn_init_soft_gpu_metrics+0x73/0x200 [amdgpu]
[   33.861799] Write of size 168 at addr ffff888129f59500 by task mangoapp/1067
...
[   33.861808] CPU: 6 UID: 1000 PID: 1067 Comm: mangoapp Tainted: G        W          6.12.0-rc4 #356 1a56f59a8b5182eeaf67eb7cb8b13594dd23b544
[   33.861816] Tainted: [W]=WARN
[   33.861818] Hardware name: Valve Galileo/Galileo, BIOS F7G0107 12/01/2023
[   33.861822] Call Trace:
[   33.861826]  <TASK>
[   33.861829]  dump_stack_lvl+0x66/0x90
[   33.861838]  print_report+0xce/0x620
[   33.861853]  kasan_report+0xda/0x110
[   33.862794]  kasan_check_range+0xfd/0x1a0
[   33.862799]  __asan_memset+0x23/0x40
[   33.862803]  smu_cmn_init_soft_gpu_metrics+0x73/0x200 [amdgpu 13b1bc364ec578808f676eba412c20eaab792779]
[   33.863306]  vangogh_get_gpu_metrics_v2_4+0x123/0xad0 [amdgpu 13b1bc364ec578808f676eba412c20eaab792779]
[   33.864257]  vangogh_common_get_gpu_metrics+0xb0c/0xbc0 [amdgpu 13b1bc364ec578808f676eba412c20eaab792779]
[   33.865682]  amdgpu_dpm_get_gpu_metrics+0xcc/0x110 [amdgpu 13b1bc364ec578808f676eba412c20eaab792779]
[   33.866160]  amdgpu_get_gpu_metrics+0x154/0x2d0 [amdgpu 13b1bc364ec578808f676eba412c20eaab792779]
[   33.867135]  dev_attr_show+0x43/0xc0
[   33.867147]  sysfs_kf_seq_show+0x1f1/0x3b0
[   33.867155]  seq_read_iter+0x3f8/0x1140
[   33.867173]  vfs_read+0x76c/0xc50
[   33.867198]  ksys_read+0xfb/0x1d0
[   33.867214]  do_syscall_64+0x90/0x160
...
[   33.867353] Allocated by task 378 on cpu 7 at 22.794876s:
[   33.867358]  kasan_save_stack+0x33/0x50
[   33.867364]  kasan_save_track+0x17/0x60
[   33.867367]  __kasan_kmalloc+0x87/0x90
[   33.867371]  vangogh_init_smc_tables+0x3f9/0x840 [amdgpu]
[   33.867835]  smu_sw_init+0xa32/0x1850 [amdgpu]
[   33.868299]  amdgpu_device_init+0x467b/0x8d90 [amdgpu]
[   33.868733]  amdgpu_driver_load_kms+0x19/0xf0 [amdgpu]
[   33.869167]  amdgpu_pci_probe+0x2d6/0xcd0 [amdgpu]
[   33.869608]  local_pci_probe+0xda/0x180
[   33.869614]  pci_device_probe+0x43f/0x6b0

Empirically we can confirm that the former allocates 152 bytes for the
table, while the latter memsets the 168 large block.

Root cause appears that when GPU metrics tables for v2_4 parts were added
it was not considered to enlarge the table to fit.

The fix in this patch is rather "brute force" and perhaps later should be
done in a smarter way, by extracting and consolidating the part version to
size logic to a common helper, instead of brute forcing the largest
possible allocation. Nevertheless, for now this works and fixes the out of
bounds write.

v2:
 * Drop impossible v3_0 case. (Mario)

Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <[email protected]>
Fixes: 41cec40 ("drm/amd/pm: Vangogh: Add new gpu_metrics_v2_4 to acquire gpu_metrics")
Cc: Mario Limonciello <[email protected]>
Cc: Evan Quan <[email protected]>
Cc: Wenyou Yang <[email protected]>
Cc: Alex Deucher <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Mario Limonciello <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <[email protected]>
(cherry picked from commit 0880f58)
Cc: [email protected] # v6.6+
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 22, 2024
KASAN reports that the GPU metrics table allocated in
vangogh_tables_init() is not large enough for the memset done in
smu_cmn_init_soft_gpu_metrics(). Condensed report follows:

[   33.861314] BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in smu_cmn_init_soft_gpu_metrics+0x73/0x200 [amdgpu]
[   33.861799] Write of size 168 at addr ffff888129f59500 by task mangoapp/1067
...
[   33.861808] CPU: 6 UID: 1000 PID: 1067 Comm: mangoapp Tainted: G        W          6.12.0-rc4 #356 1a56f59a8b5182eeaf67eb7cb8b13594dd23b544
[   33.861816] Tainted: [W]=WARN
[   33.861818] Hardware name: Valve Galileo/Galileo, BIOS F7G0107 12/01/2023
[   33.861822] Call Trace:
[   33.861826]  <TASK>
[   33.861829]  dump_stack_lvl+0x66/0x90
[   33.861838]  print_report+0xce/0x620
[   33.861853]  kasan_report+0xda/0x110
[   33.862794]  kasan_check_range+0xfd/0x1a0
[   33.862799]  __asan_memset+0x23/0x40
[   33.862803]  smu_cmn_init_soft_gpu_metrics+0x73/0x200 [amdgpu 13b1bc364ec578808f676eba412c20eaab792779]
[   33.863306]  vangogh_get_gpu_metrics_v2_4+0x123/0xad0 [amdgpu 13b1bc364ec578808f676eba412c20eaab792779]
[   33.864257]  vangogh_common_get_gpu_metrics+0xb0c/0xbc0 [amdgpu 13b1bc364ec578808f676eba412c20eaab792779]
[   33.865682]  amdgpu_dpm_get_gpu_metrics+0xcc/0x110 [amdgpu 13b1bc364ec578808f676eba412c20eaab792779]
[   33.866160]  amdgpu_get_gpu_metrics+0x154/0x2d0 [amdgpu 13b1bc364ec578808f676eba412c20eaab792779]
[   33.867135]  dev_attr_show+0x43/0xc0
[   33.867147]  sysfs_kf_seq_show+0x1f1/0x3b0
[   33.867155]  seq_read_iter+0x3f8/0x1140
[   33.867173]  vfs_read+0x76c/0xc50
[   33.867198]  ksys_read+0xfb/0x1d0
[   33.867214]  do_syscall_64+0x90/0x160
...
[   33.867353] Allocated by task 378 on cpu 7 at 22.794876s:
[   33.867358]  kasan_save_stack+0x33/0x50
[   33.867364]  kasan_save_track+0x17/0x60
[   33.867367]  __kasan_kmalloc+0x87/0x90
[   33.867371]  vangogh_init_smc_tables+0x3f9/0x840 [amdgpu]
[   33.867835]  smu_sw_init+0xa32/0x1850 [amdgpu]
[   33.868299]  amdgpu_device_init+0x467b/0x8d90 [amdgpu]
[   33.868733]  amdgpu_driver_load_kms+0x19/0xf0 [amdgpu]
[   33.869167]  amdgpu_pci_probe+0x2d6/0xcd0 [amdgpu]
[   33.869608]  local_pci_probe+0xda/0x180
[   33.869614]  pci_device_probe+0x43f/0x6b0

Empirically we can confirm that the former allocates 152 bytes for the
table, while the latter memsets the 168 large block.

Root cause appears that when GPU metrics tables for v2_4 parts were added
it was not considered to enlarge the table to fit.

The fix in this patch is rather "brute force" and perhaps later should be
done in a smarter way, by extracting and consolidating the part version to
size logic to a common helper, instead of brute forcing the largest
possible allocation. Nevertheless, for now this works and fixes the out of
bounds write.

v2:
 * Drop impossible v3_0 case. (Mario)

Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <[email protected]>
Fixes: 41cec40 ("drm/amd/pm: Vangogh: Add new gpu_metrics_v2_4 to acquire gpu_metrics")
Cc: Mario Limonciello <[email protected]>
Cc: Evan Quan <[email protected]>
Cc: Wenyou Yang <[email protected]>
Cc: Alex Deucher <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Mario Limonciello <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants