Skip to content

minor clarification for if-then-else #1545

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 2, 2024
Merged

minor clarification for if-then-else #1545

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
4 changes: 2 additions & 2 deletions jsonschema-core.md
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -1594,7 +1594,7 @@ subschema, then validation succeeds against this keyword if the instance also
successfully validates against this keyword's subschema.

This keyword has no effect when `if` is absent, or when the instance fails to
validate against its subschema. Implementations MUST NOT evaluate the instance
validate against the `if` subschema. Implementations MUST NOT evaluate the instance
against this keyword, for either validation or annotation collection purposes,
in such cases.

Expand All @@ -1607,7 +1607,7 @@ then validation succeeds against this keyword if the instance successfully
validates against this keyword's subschema.

This keyword has no effect when `if` is absent, or when the instance
successfully validates against its subschema. Implementations MUST NOT evaluate
successfully validates against the `if` subschema. Implementations MUST NOT evaluate
the instance against this keyword, for either validation or annotation
collection purposes, in such cases.

Expand Down
Loading