This repository was archived by the owner on Nov 2, 2023. It is now read-only.
Remove duplicates from obsolete-implemenetations page #394
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
✔️ Deploy Preview for condescending-hopper-c3ed30 ready! 🔨 Explore the source changes: 8dd01ec 🔍 Inspect the deploy log: https://app.netlify.com/sites/condescending-hopper-c3ed30/deploys/60be64923f4e4e0007c6b9f9 😎 Browse the preview: https://deploy-preview-394--condescending-hopper-c3ed30.netlify.app |
Relequestual
approved these changes
Jul 2, 2021
|
I think if/when we revamp the implementations page, we can merge "current" and "obsolete". What we really need is good and useable filters. I may look to work on that at some point. |
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fixes #330
I used the list of duplicates provided by @ldexterldesign in #330 to determine the duplicates. Nearly all of them didn't say anything about what drafts they support. If they didn't say I didn't dig too deep to figure out what they support. I gave them the benefit of the doubt and just removed them from the obsolete implementations page although I suspect that most of them only support draft-04. I've never liked the idea of considering draft-04 "obsolete", so I'm ok with having a few potential false positives in there.