Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Nov 2, 2023. It is now read-only.

Editor Sorted by Draft #324

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Apr 17, 2020
Merged

Editor Sorted by Draft #324

merged 4 commits into from
Apr 17, 2020

Conversation

philsturgeon
Copy link
Contributor

Removed duplicate editors from obsolete list, sorted them by draft support, left
a few implementations on the current list until I hear back from them which
versions they do support, and added Stoplight Studio (which is what I initially
came here to do before I started shaving yaks).

@philsturgeon philsturgeon requested review from Relequestual and handrews and removed request for Relequestual March 19, 2020 15:02
@netlify
Copy link

netlify bot commented Mar 19, 2020

Deploy preview for condescending-hopper-c3ed30 ready!

Built with commit 47dd5e5

https://deploy-preview-324--condescending-hopper-c3ed30.netlify.com

- [JSON Schema Editor](https://json-schema-editor.tangramjs.com) - *An intuitive editor for JSON schema online*
- [JSON Editor](https://json-editor.tangramjs.com) - *An online, schema-aware editor for JSON document*
- [Eclipse IDE](https://www.eclipse.org/downloads/eclipse-packages) - *Rich JSON edition supporting schema for instantaneous validation and error reporting, completion, documentation.*
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Eclipse is still unknown but was in both lists, so I'm giving it the benefit of the doubt. The rest had draft 4, 6, 7.

@philsturgeon philsturgeon merged commit 766d5c7 into master Apr 17, 2020
@philsturgeon philsturgeon deleted the editor-update branch April 17, 2020 21:33
@philsturgeon
Copy link
Contributor Author

@jdesrosiers were these the duplicates you noticed in #330? I'd had it sat around pending review for a month 😆 if there's any more let me know.

@jdesrosiers
Copy link
Member

Nice! You were already on it. That's some of them. I also noticed the "UI Generation" section and the "Online" section. The "Online" section can probably just be removed. I'm pretty sure all "UI Generation" duplicates just belong in implementations, but I didn't check.

@philsturgeon
Copy link
Contributor Author

Did Online efe1515

There's a TODO for UI Generation, but I've not got time for that one sadly.

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants