Latest I-D: `1.0` and `1.1e1` are integers

[awwright]

The new draft-05 suite should ensure that values like 1.0 and 1.1e1 are integers.

As resolved in #132

[Relequestual]

Calling an unwritten test a bug seems a bit unfair. Each draft has its own set of tests.

[epoberezkin]

closed by #164?

[awwright]

It appears so, though the description may need to be changed still.

…

On Mar 1, 2017 16:53, "Evgeny Poberezkin" ***@***.***> wrote: closed by #164 <#164>? — You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#135 (comment)>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAatDbWCYct27jVD26fxb8V4PKsXC2BTks5rhgTtgaJpZM4K3wob> .

[epoberezkin]

Yes, the description doesn't make sense...

"some languages do not distinguish between different types of numeric value" -> can stay the same?
"a float is not an integer even without fractional part" -> "a float without fractional part is an integer"

@handrews @awwright ok?

[awwright]

"a float without fractional part is an integer" seems really weird (since we're distinguishing two kinds of floats) but I can't think of anything better. Sounds good!