Skip to content

Breaking: rename relaxed form of Atomic Operations extension #1664

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 4, 2025

Conversation

bkoelman
Copy link
Member

@bkoelman bkoelman commented Jan 4, 2025

Breaking: Rename the relaxed form of Atomic Operations extension from "atomic-operations" to "atomic" for consistency. This exists for OpenAPI support in Content-Type and Accept HTTP headers, which is currently experimental.

QUALITY CHECKLIST

…omic-operations" to "atomic" for consistency
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 4, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 90.69%. Comparing base (dc032d8) to head (7dfc2d0).
Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #1664   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   90.69%   90.69%           
=======================================
  Files         354      354           
  Lines       11536    11536           
  Branches     1900     1900           
=======================================
  Hits        10462    10462           
  Misses        702      702           
  Partials      372      372           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@bkoelman bkoelman marked this pull request as ready for review January 4, 2025 08:32
@bkoelman bkoelman merged commit a01b268 into master Jan 4, 2025
16 checks passed
@bkoelman bkoelman deleted the rename-relaxed-operations-ext branch January 4, 2025 08:33
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant