Provide Jetty images based on openjdk:11-jre-slim

[joakime]

Issue by wenslayer
Friday Feb 15, 2019 at 22:39 GMT
Originally opened as appropriate/docker-jetty#103

---

I see the current jre-11 based Jetty image is based off openjdk:11-jre.

To reduce image size, it would be valuable if Jetty images existed that were based off the openjdk:11-jre-slim image.

Thank you for your consideration.

[joakime]

Comment by gregw
Sunday Feb 17, 2019 at 09:22 GMT

---

@md5 I'm guessing we should just make another variant rather than make everybody use slim?
@wenslayer I'm currently on vacation, so wont get around to this for a few weeks.... but if you wanted to prepare a PR, then I can review and merge if it checks out.

[joakime]

Comment by md5
Wednesday Feb 20, 2019 at 07:23 GMT

---

@md5 I'm guessing we should just make another variant rather than make everybody use slim?

Yeah, I think this would be another variant. It makes sense to me, given the lack of a JDK 11 for Alpine for the time being.

[joakime]

Comment by tianon
Wednesday Jun 19, 2019 at 22:15 GMT

---

At this point this should probably be co-opted to account for docker-library/openjdk#322. 😞

[joakime]

Comment by gregw
Thursday Oct 24, 2019 at 06:29 GMT

---

@tianon can you comment a bit more on the implications of docker-library/openjdk#322 ?

Also, I think it is time to look at jkd13... there are currently slim and buster varieties of that.

[joakime]

Comment by gregw
Monday Dec 16, 2019 at 06:46 GMT

---

The merge of #121 created the slim images, but has broken the architecture rules.

[joakime]

Comment by gregw
Thursday Dec 19, 2019 at 21:20 GMT

---

docker-library/official-images#7134

[lachlan-roberts]

@wenslayer there are now jetty images available based off openjdk:11-jre-slim.