Major dashboard overhauls #29
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
WalkthroughThis pull request updates a dependency in the package.json and introduces a new field, Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant UI as "UI Component"
participant LM as "LogicMap"
participant DB as "Database (Supabase)"
User->>UI: Triggers add/edit/delete action
UI->>LM: Update state (open modal, update search/query, etc.)
LM-->>UI: Renders updated UI (modal open, table updated)
User->>UI: Submits form for add/update/delete
UI->>LM: Calls addQuestion/updateQuestion/handleDelete method
LM->>DB: Executes corresponding SQL operation
DB-->>LM: Returns operation result (success/error)
LM-->>UI: Updates state and UI based on result
Possibly related PRs
Poem
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 15
🧹 Nitpick comments (26)
src/routes/dashboard/pharm/[slug]/components/quiz/QuizContent.svelte (1)
44-44: Consider using a unique identifier instead of index as keyWhile adding a key to the
#eachblock is a good practice, using the loop index as the key may not be optimal if items can be added, removed, or reordered in the list.If the
optionobject contains a unique identifier property, consider using that instead:-{#each qm.questionAnswerStates as option, index (index)} +{#each qm.questionAnswerStates as option, index (option.id || index)}src/routes/admin/questions/components/Table.svelte (2)
31-41: Consider adding image error handlingWhile you've handled the case when
pic_urlis missing, it would be good to add error handling for when the image URL is invalid or fails to load.- <img src={question.pic_url} alt="Question" /> + <img + src={question.pic_url} + alt="Question" + on:error={(e) => { + e.target.onerror = null; + e.target.src = "/images/fallback-image.png"; + }} + />
50-56: Use Svelte event directives instead of onclickSvelte provides event directives like
on:clickthat are preferred over using the HTMLonclickattribute. This leverages Svelte's event handling system properly.<button class="btn btn-sm btn-soft btn-error rounded-full" - onclick={() => { + on:click={() => { lm.pendingDeleteId = question.id; lm.isDeleteModalOpen = true; }} aria-label="Delete question" ><button class="btn btn-sm btn-soft btn-accent rounded-full" - onclick={() => lm.openEditModal(question)} + on:click={() => lm.openEditModal(question)} aria-label="Edit question" >Also applies to: 60-66
src/routes/admin/challenge/components/DeleteConfirmationModel.svelte (1)
32-49: Use Svelte event directives instead of onclickSvelte provides event directives like
on:clickthat are preferred over using the HTMLonclickattribute.<button class="btn btn-outline" - onclick={() => { + on:click={() => { lm.isDeleteModalOpen = false; lm.pendingDeleteId = ''; }} disabled={lm.isDeleting} > Cancel </button> <button class="btn btn-error" - onclick={() => lm.handleDelete()} + on:click={() => lm.handleDelete()} disabled={lm.isDeleting} >src/routes/admin/questions/components/PaginationControls.svelte (3)
30-43: Use Svelte event directives instead of onclickSvelte provides event directives like
on:clickthat are preferred over using the HTMLonclickattribute. This leverages Svelte's event handling system properly.<button class="join-item btn btn-sm" disabled={lm.currentPage === 1} - onclick={() => lm.goToPage(1)} + on:click={() => lm.goToPage(1)} > First </button>Apply this change to all the navigation buttons in the component.
Also applies to: 67-80
45-64: Extract page calculation logic for better maintainabilityThe page number calculation logic is quite complex. Consider extracting it to a separate function in the script section for better maintainability and testing.
<script lang="ts"> import { ChevronLeft, ChevronRight } from 'lucide-svelte'; let { lm = $bindable() } = $props(); + + function calculatePageNumbers(currentPage, totalPages, maxVisiblePages = 5) { + const pageNumbers = []; + + if (totalPages <= maxVisiblePages) { + // Show all pages + for (let i = 1; i <= totalPages; i++) { + pageNumbers.push(i); + } + } else if (currentPage <= 3) { + // Near the start + for (let i = 1; i <= maxVisiblePages; i++) { + pageNumbers.push(i); + } + } else if (currentPage >= totalPages - 2) { + // Near the end + for (let i = totalPages - maxVisiblePages + 1; i <= totalPages; i++) { + pageNumbers.push(i); + } + } else { + // Middle + for (let i = currentPage - 2; i <= currentPage + 2; i++) { + pageNumbers.push(i); + } + } + + return pageNumbers; + } </script> <!-- In the template --> - {#each Array.from({ length: Math.min(5, lm.totalPages) }, (_, i) => { - let pageNum; - if (lm.totalPages <= 5) { - pageNum = i + 1; - } else if (lm.currentPage <= 3) { - pageNum = i + 1; - } else if (lm.currentPage >= lm.totalPages - 2) { - pageNum = lm.totalPages - 4 + i; - } else { - pageNum = lm.currentPage - 2 + i; - } - return pageNum; - }) as pageNum (pageNum)} + {#each calculatePageNumbers(lm.currentPage, lm.totalPages) as pageNum (pageNum)}
16-24: Improve accessibility for the items per page dropdownThe select dropdown has a visually hidden label which is good, but could benefit from more explicit aria attributes.
- <label for="per-page" class="sr-only">Items per page</label> - <select id="per-page" class="select select-sm" bind:value={lm.questionsPerPage}> + <label for="per-page" class="sr-only">Items per page</label> + <select + id="per-page" + class="select select-sm" + bind:value={lm.questionsPerPage} + aria-label="Select number of items per page" + aria-controls="questions-table" + >Also, add an id to the table element in the parent component to make the aria-controls reference valid.
src/routes/admin/progress/+page.svelte (1)
123-123: Consider using chapter_id as a key instead of the entire chapter objectWhile adding keys to the
eachblock is a good optimization, using the entire chapter object as a key isn't ideal. Using the unique identifierchapter.chapter_idwould be more appropriate and performant.-{#each selectedUser.chapters as chapter (chapter)} +{#each selectedUser.chapters as chapter (chapter.chapter_id)}src/routes/admin/questions/components/DeleteConfirmationModel.svelte (2)
1-4: Check file naming - "Model" should likely be "Modal"The filename contains "Model" but the component is implementing a modal dialog. This appears to be a typo in the filename.
Consider renaming the file to
DeleteConfirmationModal.svelteto match its functionality.
18-23: Defensively handle potential undefined questionThe code attempts to find and display a question by ID, but doesn't handle the case where the question might not be found.
{#if lm.pendingDeleteId} <p class="py-4">Are you sure you want to delete this question?</p> <div class="my-4 p-4 bg-base-200 rounded-box"> - {lm.questions.find((q) => q.id === lm.pendingDeleteId)?.question_data.question} + {lm.questions.find((q) => q.id === lm.pendingDeleteId)?.question_data?.question || 'Question not found'} </div> {/if}src/routes/admin/questions/components/Search.svelte (1)
42-46: Consider adding a meaningful label for each chapterCurrently, the option just displays the raw chapter value. Consider adding a more descriptive label such as "Chapter {chapter}" to improve readability.
{#each chapters as chapter (chapter)} {#if chapter} - <option value={chapter}>{chapter}</option> + <option value={chapter}>Chapter {chapter}</option> {/if} {/each}src/routes/admin/challenge/components/SortOptions.svelte (1)
36-41: Simplify the "Oldest First" button click handlerThe current implementation has unnecessary complexity. The toggle logic can be simplified since
toggleSortshould already handle toggling the direction when the same field is selected.<button - onclick={() => { - lm.toggleSort('created_at'); - if (lm.sortDirection === 'desc') lm.sortDirection = 'asc'; - }} + onclick={() => lm.toggleSort('created_at', 'asc')} >This assumes the
toggleSortmethod can accept a preferred direction as a second parameter. If it doesn't, consider enhancing theLogicMapclass to support this.src/routes/admin/questions/components/EditQuestionModal.svelte (3)
15-16: Check the maximum number of options foroptionLetters.
TheoptionLettersarray is limited to letters 'A' through 'J', meaning only 10 possible answer choices. If your code can allow more than 10, you may need to expand or handle the overflow scenario gracefully.
24-28: Potential accessibility improvement for the modal transitions.
While the fade and fly transitions provide a smooth user experience, ensure that the modal remains keyboard-accessible for screen readers during the transitions. Consider adding ARIA attributes to communicate the open/closed state.
212-249: Validate error messaging and concurrency.
Whenlm.saveErroris set, the error is displayed. However, confirm that multiple concurrent saves or repeated clicks won't lead to unexpected UI states. You might want to disable the Save Changes button until the first save completes or handle concurrency carefully.src/routes/dashboard/challenge/+page.svelte (1)
323-353: Check the viability of using(index)as the key.
When the underlying array changes, using the index as the key can cause potential issues if items are reordered. If there's a unique identifier for eachoption, consider using that instead.src/routes/admin/questions/components/AddNewQuestionModal.svelte (1)
156-184: Handle empty correct answers gracefully.
You're filtering out empty strings in the logic layer, but also ensure that your UI or transitions do not create multiple empty placeholders that might confuse the user. Checking the user experience can help avoid confusion.src/routes/admin/challenge/logic.svelte.ts (3)
33-55: Verify the correctness of your derived question filtering and sorting.
When sorting bycreated_at, you return0in all other cases, which effectively doesn't reorder those items. If you expand the sorting to other fields later, ensure you handle them here to avoid unexpected results.
222-282: Check concurrency inupdateQuestion.
While your try-catch block is effective, multiple users might edit the same question concurrently. You may need to incorporate version checks or row-level security in Supabase to handle potential collisions.
367-371: More robust matching for letter extraction.
/^([A-Z])\./will only capture single uppercase letters followed by a period. If your code evolves to support lower-case letters or differently formatted indexes, consider a more flexible approach to extracting the letter.src/routes/admin/challenge/components/EditQuestionModal.svelte (1)
106-116: Add a confirmation step before removing the image.
Immediately removing the uploaded image might lead to accidental deletions. Consider adding a brief confirmation.-<button ... onclick={() => (lm.editImageUrl = null)}> +<button + ... + onclick={() => { + if (confirm("Remove the image?")) { + lm.editImageUrl = null; + } + }} >src/routes/admin/challenge/components/PaginationControls.svelte (1)
11-14: Handle potential zero or null totalEntries.
Iflm.totalEntriesis 0, the displayed range might be misleading. Consider a fallback message when no entries exist.src/routes/admin/challenge/components/AddNewQuestionModal.svelte (2)
8-17: Revisit default correct answers.
Automatically setting['A']could be confusing if there are no options or if more nuanced defaults are required.
104-122: Consider a quick confirmation before image removal.
This prevents unintended deletion of the newly uploaded image.-onclick={() => (lm.newImageUrl = null)} +onclick={() => { + if (confirm("Remove the image?")) { + lm.newImageUrl = null; + } +}}src/routes/admin/questions/logic.svelte.ts (2)
30-53: Consider extending the sort logic or clarifying the restricted sort field.
Right now, sorting is only applied ifthis.sortFieldequals'created_at'. If other fields ever need sorting, the default return of0will silently skip it. Consider enhancing or clarifying this intended limitation.
126-148: Inconsistent option labeling for editing vs. new questions.
When editing an existing question, a blank string is pushed as a new option, while new questions get lettered options. Consider aligning these flows to avoid potential confusion for editors.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
package-lock.jsonis excluded by!**/package-lock.json
📒 Files selected for processing (29)
package.json(1 hunks)src/lib/types.ts(2 hunks)src/routes/+layout.svelte(1 hunks)src/routes/about/+page.svelte(0 hunks)src/routes/admin/challenge/+page.server.ts(1 hunks)src/routes/admin/challenge/+page.svelte(4 hunks)src/routes/admin/challenge/components/AddNewQuestionModal.svelte(1 hunks)src/routes/admin/challenge/components/DeleteConfirmationModel.svelte(1 hunks)src/routes/admin/challenge/components/EditQuestionModal.svelte(1 hunks)src/routes/admin/challenge/components/PaginationControls.svelte(2 hunks)src/routes/admin/challenge/components/Search.svelte(1 hunks)src/routes/admin/challenge/components/SortOptions.svelte(1 hunks)src/routes/admin/challenge/components/Table.svelte(1 hunks)src/routes/admin/challenge/logic.svelte.ts(1 hunks)src/routes/admin/progress/+page.svelte(3 hunks)src/routes/admin/questions/+page.server.ts(1 hunks)src/routes/admin/questions/+page.svelte(1 hunks)src/routes/admin/questions/components/AddNewQuestionModal.svelte(1 hunks)src/routes/admin/questions/components/DeleteConfirmationModel.svelte(1 hunks)src/routes/admin/questions/components/EditQuestionModal.svelte(1 hunks)src/routes/admin/questions/components/PaginationControls.svelte(1 hunks)src/routes/admin/questions/components/Search.svelte(1 hunks)src/routes/admin/questions/components/SortOptions.svelte(1 hunks)src/routes/admin/questions/components/Table.svelte(1 hunks)src/routes/admin/questions/logic.svelte.ts(1 hunks)src/routes/dashboard/+page.svelte(1 hunks)src/routes/dashboard/challenge/+page.svelte(2 hunks)src/routes/dashboard/pharm/[slug]/components/quiz/QuestionNavigation.svelte(1 hunks)src/routes/dashboard/pharm/[slug]/components/quiz/QuizContent.svelte(1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- src/routes/about/+page.svelte
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code Definitions (2)
src/routes/admin/challenge/logic.svelte.ts (1)
src/lib/types.ts (1)
AdminChallengeQuestions(53-64)
src/routes/admin/questions/logic.svelte.ts (1)
src/lib/types.ts (1)
AdminQuestions(41-51)
🔇 Additional comments (71)
src/routes/dashboard/pharm/[slug]/components/quiz/QuestionNavigation.svelte (1)
8-8: Great performance improvement!Adding the question ID as a key in the each block helps Svelte efficiently track and update only the changed elements during re-renders, rather than recreating the entire list. This is especially important for interactive components like question navigation.
src/routes/+layout.svelte (1)
96-96: Good optimization for consistencyAdding the theme name as a key in the each block improves rendering efficiency. While the performance impact may be minimal for this static list, this change maintains consistency with the optimization pattern applied throughout the codebase.
src/routes/admin/questions/+page.server.ts (1)
15-15:✅ Verification successful
Good data model enhancement
Adding the
created_atfield to the query enhances the data available to the frontend, likely enabling new sorting or filtering capabilities in the admin interface.Ensure that the corresponding TypeScript interface (likely
AdminQuestions) has been updated to include this new field. You can verify this with:
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Check if the TypeScript interfaces include the created_at field grep -r "interface AdminQuestions" --include="*.ts" . grep -r "created_at" --include="*.ts" . | grep -i "interface\|type\|questions"Length of output: 737
Data Model Enhancement Verified
The addition of the
created_atfield in the database query for questions is confirmed. Verification shows that the corresponding TypeScript interface (AdminQuestionsinsrc/lib/types.ts) now includes thecreated_at: string;property. Additionally, the sorting logic insrc/routes/admin/questions/logic.svelte.tscorrectly utilizes this field, ensuring consistency across the codebase. This change appears well-integrated and supports potential new features like sorting or filtering by creation date.
- Confirmed interface update in
src/lib/types.ts- Verified usage in UI sorting in
src/routes/admin/questions/logic.svelte.tssrc/routes/dashboard/+page.svelte (1)
147-147: Good optimization: Added key to #each blockAdding the
(originalIndex)key to the#eachblock is an excellent optimization that helps Svelte efficiently track and update items during reactivity. This prevents unnecessary DOM recreation when the list changes.src/routes/admin/challenge/+page.server.ts (1)
15-15: SQL query properly updated to include new fieldThe addition of
created_atto the select query correctly aligns with the interface changes in the types file, ensuring type safety and data consistency throughout the application.src/lib/types.ts (2)
50-50: Consistently added created_at field to AdminQuestions interfaceThe addition of the
created_atfield properly extends the interface to match the updated SQL queries, maintaining type safety across the application.
63-63: Consistently added created_at field to AdminChallengeQuestions interfaceThe addition of the
created_atfield properly extends the interface to match the updated SQL queries, maintaining type safety across the application.src/routes/admin/questions/components/Table.svelte (2)
22-22: Great use of keys in iteration blocks!You've correctly used unique keys in all your
#eachloops (question.id, option, answer). This is important for maintaining component state and optimizing rendering performance when the list changes.Also applies to: 26-28, 45-47
24-24:✅ Verification successful
Consider sanitizing user-generated content
If the question text and explanation are user-generated, they might contain HTML that could lead to XSS vulnerabilities when rendered directly. Consider using a sanitization library or Svelte's built-in features to prevent this.
Also applies to: 43-43
🌐 Web query:
How to prevent XSS in Svelte when rendering user-generated content?💡 Result:
To prevent XSS attacks in Svelte when rendering user-generated content, implement these security measures:
Sanitize HTML Input
- Use DOMPurify to clean user-generated HTML before rendering. This removes malicious scripts and unsafe elements[3][12]:
<script> import DOMPurify from 'dompurify'; let userContent = '<span onmouseover="alert(1)">User input</span>'; let sanitized = DOMPurify.sanitize(userContent); </script> {@html sanitized}Avoid
{@html}With Untrusted Data
- The
{@html}tag bypasses Svelte’s automatic escaping. Never use it with raw user input without sanitization[10][12].- Enable the
svelte/no-at-html-tagsESLint rule to flag unsafe usage[10].
Enable Content Security Policy (CSP)
Configure SvelteKit’s CSP to block unauthorized script execution:
In
svelte.config.js:import adapter from '@sveltejs/adapter-static'; export default { kit: { adapter: adapter(), csp: { mode: 'hash', // For static sites directives: { 'script-src': ['self'], 'style-src': ['self', 'unsafe-inline'] // Required for Svelte transitions } } } };
- Use
noncefor SSR sites andhashfor static sites[1][7].- SvelteKit auto-generates script hashes during build for static content[4].
Deploy with Headers (e.g., Netlify/Cloudflare):
Content-Security-Policy: script-src 'self' 'sha256-...'; style-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline'
Mitigate Known Vulnerabilities
- Upgrade Svelte to ≥3.46.5 to fix XSS via unsafe
toString()in attributes[6].- Update SvelteKit to ≥2.8.3 to patch CVE-2024-53261 (development-mode XSS)[8].
Security Best Practices
- Validate Input on both client and server sides.
- Avoid
unsafe-inlinefor Scripts where possible, though Svelte currently requires it for styles[4][9].- Use CSP Reporting to detect policy violations:
csp: { reportOnly: { 'script-src': ['self'], 'report-uri': ['/csp-report-endpoint'] } }By combining sanitization, CSP, and secure coding practices, you significantly reduce XSS risks while maintaining Svelte’s interactivity[1][3][7].
Citations:
- 1: https://dev.to/askrodney/sveltekit-content-security-policy-csp-for-xss-protection-589k
- 2: https://dev.to/thiteago/protecting-sveltekit-routes-from-unauthenticated-users-nb9
- 3: https://caisy.io/blog/svelte-html-rendering-guide
- 4: https://rodneylab.com/sveltekit-content-security-policy/
- 5: https://github.com/rodneylab/sveltekit-content-security-policy
- 6: https://security.snyk.io/vuln/SNYK-JS-SVELTE-2414372
- 7: https://svelte.dev/docs/kit/configuration
- 8: https://ogma.in/mitigating-cve-2024-53261-in-sveltekit-addressing-cross-site-scripting-vulnerabilities
- 9: https://answers.netlify.com/t/sveltekit-and-netlify-csp-conflict/96802
- 10: https://sveltejs.github.io/eslint-plugin-svelte/rules/no-at-html-tags/
- 11: sveltejs/kit#11747
- 12: https://svelte.dev/repl/2cccd398e5f540adab27d76830fb9a1f?version=4.2.17
- 13: sveltejs/svelte#7253
Security Advisory: Verify Rendering Approach for User-Generated Content
- The code on line 24 currently uses Svelte’s standard interpolation (
{...}), which escapes HTML and inherently protects against XSS.- If you ever need to render raw HTML (for example, using
{@html}as implied by the note on line 43), please ensure you sanitize the input using a robust library like DOMPurify.- Additionally, consider enabling the ESLint rule
svelte/no-at-html-tagsto discourage unsafe usage of raw HTML with untrusted data.Overall, if plain text rendering is intended throughout, the current approach is safe; however, any shift toward direct HTML insertion will require proper sanitization to mitigate XSS risks.
src/routes/admin/challenge/components/Table.svelte (3)
31-41: Consider adding image error handlingWhile you've handled the case when
pic_urlis missing, it would be good to add error handling for when the image URL is invalid or fails to load.
24-24: Consider sanitizing user-generated contentIf the question text and explanation are user-generated, they might contain HTML that could lead to XSS vulnerabilities when rendered directly. Consider using a sanitization library or Svelte's built-in features to prevent this.
Also applies to: 43-43
50-56: Use Svelte event directives instead of onclickSvelte provides event directives like
on:clickthat are preferred over using the HTMLonclickattribute. This leverages Svelte's event handling system properly.Also applies to: 60-66
src/routes/admin/progress/+page.svelte (2)
189-189: Good usage of user_id as a key in the each blockUsing
user.user_idas a key for theeachblock is the correct approach. This helps Svelte efficiently update the DOM when the list changes.
47-47:❓ Verification inconclusive
Verify the impact of changing the sort field from chapter_number to chapter_id
The sorting criteria has been changed from
chapter_numbertochapter_id. This could impact the order in which chapters are displayed to users.
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Check if chapter_id and chapter_number are consistently ordered # This will help determine if the sort change alters the display order # Look for the definition of both fields in type definitions echo "Checking type definitions and schema for chapter fields:" rg -A 3 "chapter_id|chapter_number" --type=ts # Check if there are any other places sorting by chapter_number echo "Checking for other occurrences of chapter_number sorting:" rg "sort.*chapter_number" --type=ts --type=svelteLength of output: 1001
Verify Consistent Ordering Between Server and Client
The client code in
src/routes/admin/progress/+page.svelte(line 47) now sorts chapters bychapter_id, while the server code insrc/routes/admin/progress/+page.server.tscontinues to order bychapter_number. Additionally, the type definitions insrc/lib/types.tsonly includechapter_id. This mismatch could lead to inconsistent chapter ordering ifchapter_iddoes not correlate with the intended display order originally based onchapter_number. Please verify whether:
- The client-side change is intentional.
- The backend ordering should also be updated to use
chapter_id(or if the data source already ensures equivalence).- The overall impact on the chapter display order meets the product requirements.
src/routes/admin/questions/components/DeleteConfirmationModel.svelte (2)
31-41: Good practice: Disabling buttons during processingDisabling the cancel button while deletion is in progress prevents users from canceling an operation that's already underway, which is good user experience design.
42-49: Well-implemented loading state feedbackThe loading spinner during deletion provides good visual feedback to users. The conditional rendering with a clear message indicates the system state effectively.
src/routes/admin/questions/components/Search.svelte (1)
25-49: Good responsive layout implementationThe component uses responsive design with
flex-colfor small screens andflex-rowfor larger screens. The search and filter controls are well-organized and adapt appropriately to different viewport sizes.src/routes/admin/challenge/components/SortOptions.svelte (3)
13-23: Nice dynamic UI feedback based on sort stateThe component effectively displays different icons and text based on the current sort state, providing clear visual feedback to users about how the data is being organized.
8-9: Good implementation of result countShowing the number of filtered results provides helpful context to users, especially when they're applying search or filter criteria.
1-5: Consistent use of the LogicMap patternThis component follows the same pattern as other new components, binding to a shared
lm(LogicMap) object. This approach centralizes state management and promotes consistency across components.src/routes/admin/questions/components/EditQuestionModal.svelte (3)
6-13: Validate your custom$bindable()usage.
You appear to rely on$bindable()and$derived.by()features which are not standard Svelte functionalities. Ensure that these custom store directives are properly defined and tested, or consider a more standard approach for Svelte store usage.
34-41: Ensure consistent reset of editing state.
When closing the modal, you resetlm.isEditModalOpen,lm.editingQuestion, andlm.editImageUrl. Verify that you also reset any other related state if used (e.g., partial unsaved changes) to avoid stale data if the user opens the modal again.
175-178: Ensure correct matching of letters to options.
Here, you're checking whether each option starts withletter + '.'. If the text for each option is manually edited, it might no longer match this pattern. Consider a more robust approach to track the relationship between letters and options to prevent mismatches.src/routes/dashboard/challenge/+page.svelte (1)
264-283: Great use of keyed each block for unique identification.
By adding(id)as the key, you ensure more stable and efficient DOM updates when question IDs re-order or re-render.src/routes/admin/questions/components/AddNewQuestionModal.svelte (4)
6-17: Ensure the default correct answer logic handles multiple calls.
Using an$effectto set a default correct answer is helpful, but be cautious about repeatedly setting['A']if the user tries to remove correct answers. Confirm that this code won't override user input when reopening the modal.
19-23: Double-check your custom store derivation.
Similar to the EditQuestionModal, ensure$derived.by()is properly defined and tested. This is not standard Svelte usage, so confirm it matches your intended data reactivity.
118-139: Validate minimum options logic.
You disable the remove button if there are only two options left. Make sure to also handle edge cases where the user might reduce or reorder options and possibly break the letter-based system if there's a mismatch.
206-211: Ensure robust error feedback.
Whenlm.addErroris set, you display an alert. Validate that users can clearly see how to rectify the error (e.g., missing question text) and confirm you reset this error once they've corrected the issue and reattempted.src/routes/admin/challenge/logic.svelte.ts (1)
5-17: Verify custom$state()usage.
You are using$state()for storing your data. This is non-standard in typical Svelte usage. Ensure it is properly integrated into your codebase, with unambiguous reactivity guaranteed.src/routes/admin/questions/components/SortOptions.svelte (2)
13-23: Looks clean and well-structured.
By conditionally displaying different icons and labels based onlm.sortField, the code provides a clear user experience.
1-5:❓ Verification inconclusive
Verify usage of
$bindable()in Svelte.
$bindable()is not a standard Svelte API. Ensure that it's properly defined or imported in your codebase so that Svelte recognizes this binding.
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash rg "\$bindable"Length of output: 16
Action Required: Verify the custom binding function
The use of
$bindable()insrc/routes/admin/questions/components/SortOptions.svelte(lines 1‑5) remains unclear. Our initial search for occurrences of$bindablein the repository did not reveal any corresponding definition or import, which confirms that this is not part of Svelte’s standard API. Please ensure that:
$bindable()is either defined in your codebase or properly imported from a custom library.- If it is an intended custom function, add a clear definition and any necessary documentation.
- Otherwise, consider replacing it with an appropriate, supported Svelte binding that meets your requirements.
src/routes/admin/challenge/components/EditQuestionModal.svelte (3)
8-13: Ensurelm.questionsis always defined.
You're mapping overlm.questionsto derive chapters. Confirm that it's never null or undefined, or provide a fallback for empty lists.
299-317: Styling approach is consistent.
The transitions and backdrop styling follow modern UI patterns and complement the rest of the layout.
1-7:❓ Verification inconclusive
Validate
handleEditImageUploadusage.
The prophandleEditImageUploadis not fully shown here. Verify it properly updateslm.editImageUrland handles file validations as expected.
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash rg "handleEditImageUpload"Length of output: 440
Double-check
handleEditImageUploadimplementation details.
The grep output confirms that the function is defined in the parent file (src/routes/admin/challenge/+page.svelte) and is correctly passed to theEditQuestionModalcomponent. However, please verify that within its implementation the function properly updateslm.editImageUrland includes all necessary file validation logic. Specifically, review the code in+page.svelteto ensure:
- File input changes trigger valid file type/size checks before updating
lm.editImageUrl.- The state update on
lm.editImageUrlis handled reliably after validation.src/routes/admin/challenge/components/PaginationControls.svelte (2)
45-57: Pagination logic is well-structured.
Your approach for generating page numbers based onlm.currentPageandlm.totalPagesis clear and concise.
4-4:❓ Verification inconclusive
Double-check
$bindable()usage.
As with other components, ensure$bindable()is properly defined and recognized in the codebase.
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash rg "\$bindable"Length of output: 16
I'll run another verification to search for any definitions or usages of
bindable(with or without the$prefix) across the repository to get a clearer picture of its origin. This should help us confirm whether$bindable()is indeed defined or if it’s being used erroneously.
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Searching for any definitions or invocations of bindable, optionally with a '$' rg -n "(\\$)?bindable\\s*\\(" .Length of output: 1627
Double-check
$bindable()definition and its global inclusion.
The grep search shows that$bindable()is used consistently across multiple components (e.g., in PaginationControls.svelte, EditQuestionModal.svelte, and others). However, there’s no explicit definition or import found within the repository, which suggests that it might be provided via a global setup (such as a Svelte preprocessor or a project-wide helper). Please verify that$bindable()is indeed defined in the project’s global context or imported correctly.src/routes/admin/challenge/components/AddNewQuestionModal.svelte (2)
299-316: Smooth transitions and consistent backdrop styling.
These changes maintain a polished, uniform look across modals.
6-7:❓ Verification inconclusive
Confirm
handleNewImageUploadoperation.
Similar to the edit modal, verify that the method setslm.newImageUrland properly handles file size/type checks.
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash rg "handleNewImageUpload"Length of output: 442
Confirm
handleNewImageUploadfunctionality and validation logic
- The
handleNewImageUploadfunction is passed from+page.svelteto the modal via$props, and its registration inAddNewQuestionModal.sveltelooks correct.- Please verify that the implementation in
src/routes/admin/challenge/+page.svelte:
- Properly updates
lm.newImageUrlupon a successful image upload.- Includes file size and type validations, similar to the logic in the edit modal.
src/routes/admin/challenge/components/Search.svelte (6)
1-3: Imports look good and align with the TypeScript conversion.
The migration to TypeScript and the icon imports fromlucide-svelteare appropriate and consistent with the usage seen below.
5-5: Prop destructuring approach is clear and concise.
Usinglet { lm = $bindable() } = $props();centralizes all relevant data under one object, improving maintainability.
7-11: Confirm numeric assumptions in chapter sorting.
(a, b) => Number(a) - Number(b)implies that chapters are numeric. If chapters can sometimes be strings (e.g., "Intro", "A", "Prologue"), consider a fallback or string ordering. Also ensurelm.questionsis always defined to avoid runtime errors.
18-18: Button click event integration is well-structured.
Invokinglm.openAddModal()from the button is consistent with the new consolidated logic object.
28-28: Binding to a centralized logic object.
Replacing multiple local bindings withlm.searchQueryandlm.selectedChapterkeeps state changes in one place. This is a clean approach for maintainability.Also applies to: 33-33, 40-40
42-42: Key usage in loop could require a uniqueness guarantee.
Usingchapteras the key works if each chapter is guaranteed to be unique. Otherwise, consider a more robust identifier in case of duplicates.src/routes/admin/challenge/+page.svelte (8)
5-5: Imports are properly grouped and relevant.
Bringing inTable,EditQuestionModal,LogicMap,DeleteConfirmationModel, andSortOptionsensures a modular approach.Also applies to: 8-8, 9-9, 10-10, 11-11
16-16: Creation of the LogicMap state is concise.
Instantiatinglmwith$state(new LogicMap(data))effectively consolidates all admin challenge logic.
23-24: Guard thelm.newQuestionusage.
Ensurelm.newQuestionalways holds expected properties whenlm.isAddModalOpenis true. Otherwise, consider a defensive check to avoid undefined property access.
31-32: Resetting upload indicators is coherent.
Settinglm.addImageUploadingandlm.editImageUploadingto false on completion or error is essential for user feedback.Also applies to: 37-38
76-77: Automatic page reset on filter changes.
Resettinglm.currentPageto1whensearchQueryorselectedChapterchanges is a good UX practice.
90-90: Begin edit image upload with clear status updates.
Explicitly togglinglm.editImageUploadingis consistent with the logic for user feedback on ongoing operations.
101-101: New image upload status update is consistent.
Settinglm.addImageUploadingtotrueensures the UI can reflect the upload’s progress for new questions.
106-110: Refactored layout for search, sort, and modals is well-organized.
Binding each component (Search,SortOptions,DeleteConfirmationModel,AddNewQuestionModal,EditQuestionModal, andTable) tolmcentralizes state and improves readability.Also applies to: 113-113, 117-118, 120-121, 123-123
src/routes/admin/questions/+page.svelte (7)
4-10: Component imports mirror the updated architecture.
ImportingTable,Search,AddNewQuestionModal,EditQuestionModal,LogicMap,DeleteConfirmationModel, andSortOptionsaligns with the new consolidated logic pattern.
15-15: Initialization of LogicMap is straightforward.
let lm = $state(new LogicMap(data));securely holds question data and shared logic.
21-23: Reading URL parameters for search and pagination is consistent.
Using the same approach as in other admin pages ensures predictable user experience.
28-30: URL parameter updates integrate well with the reactive store.
Programmatically settingsearch,page, andperPagehelps maintain stateful URLs while navigating.
41-43: Popstate event handling for sync.
Applying the same logic on browser navigation ensures consistent transitions for queries and pagination.
51-52: Page reset on filter changes.
Resettinglm.currentPageto1ifsearchQueryorselectedChapterchanges matches the rest of this refactor.
57-75: Refactored layout and state bindings align with the new architecture.
Replacing scattered variables with a singleLogicMapinstance simplifies management of search, sort, and modal states.src/routes/admin/questions/logic.svelte.ts (12)
1-4: Looks good!
No issues spotted with the import statements or Supabase client reference.
5-7: Initialization is clear.
Declaring the questions array with a reactive state is straightforward and correct.
8-10: Constructor usage is appropriate.
Assigning the passed-in data to local state is direct and concise.
12-18: State variables for delete flow are well-defined.
These initial states are consistent and semantically named.
19-24: Edit modal state variables look good.
They follow a similar pattern to the deletion states, maintaining clarity.
25-29: Add question modal state is consistent.
Initialization of “isAddModalOpen” and “newQuestion” is clear and easy to follow.
55-71: Verify non-zero page size scenarios.
IfquestionsPerPagewere set to 0, the slice and math operations may behave unexpectedly. Make sure that zero or negative page sizes are never passed in, or add guards.
72-90: Pagination utilities look fine.
The logic for toggling sort and clearing it, as well as resettingcurrentPage, is coherent.
92-98: Page navigation logic is correct.
Ensuring the page number is within valid bounds before updating is a good safeguard.
99-106: Edit modal approach is straightforward.
Deep copying to avoid direct mutation of original data is a clean approach.
107-124: New question modal initialization looks good.
Including a defaultcreated_attimestamp is a nice touch for consistent data representation.
179-361: All remaining methods appear in good shape.
Validation checks before updating or inserting data, plus local state synchronization, look properly handled.
| @@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ | |||
| "daisyui": "^5.0.0-beta.1", | |||
| "eslint": "^9.7.0", | |||
| "eslint-config-prettier": "^9.1.0", | |||
| "eslint-plugin-svelte": "^2.36.0", | |||
| "eslint-plugin-svelte": "^3.3.3", | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Verification agent
🧩 Analysis chain
Verify ESLint configuration compatibility with the new plugin version
You've updated eslint-plugin-svelte from v2 to v3, which is a major version upgrade that often includes breaking changes. Please ensure your ESLint configuration still works correctly with this new version.
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for ESLint configuration files and try running the lint command
echo "Checking for ESLint configuration files:"
find . -name ".eslintrc*" -o -name "eslint.config.*"
echo -e "\nTrying to run ESLint to verify it still works with the new plugin version:"
npm run lintLength of output: 762
Linter Failure: Resolve Missing Prettier Plugin Dependency
The upgrade to "eslint-plugin-svelte": "^3.3.3" is a significant change and may necessitate updates to your linting and formatting setup. When running the lint command, the process failed with the error:
[error] Cannot find package 'prettier-plugin-svelte' imported from /home/jailuser/git/noop.js
This suggests that either the Prettier configuration now expects the prettier-plugin-svelte package or an existing reference in your configuration is no longer valid. Please address the following:
- ESLint/Prettier Configuration: Verify that your ESLint and Prettier configurations (e.g., in
eslint.config.jsor any Prettier config file) are compatible witheslint-plugin-svelteversion 3. - Dependency Management: If your project requires
prettier-plugin-sveltefor proper file formatting, add it to your devDependencies. Otherwise, remove any references to it from your configuration files. - Manual Verification: After making the necessary adjustments, re-run the lint command (e.g.,
npm run lint) to ensure that the process completes without errors.
Please resolve the missing dependency issue and verify that the linting process now works correctly.
| <script lang="ts"> | ||
| let { lm = $bindable() } = $props(); | ||
| </script> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Filename typo: "Model" should be "Modal"
The component filename is "DeleteConfirmationModel.svelte" but it should be "DeleteConfirmationModal.svelte" since it's implementing a modal dialog, not a data model.
| <form method="dialog"> | ||
| <button | ||
| class="btn btn-sm btn-circle btn-ghost absolute right-2 top-2" | ||
| onclick={() => { | ||
| lm.isDeleteModalOpen = false; | ||
| lm.pendingDeleteId = ''; | ||
| }}>✕</button | ||
| > | ||
| </form> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Improve modal form implementation
The current form implementation has a few issues:
- It's using
method="dialog"but not handling actual form submission - It doesn't properly handle keyboard accessibility (like Escape key)
- <form method="dialog">
- <button
- class="btn btn-sm btn-circle btn-ghost absolute right-2 top-2"
- onclick={() => {
- lm.isDeleteModalOpen = false;
- lm.pendingDeleteId = '';
- }}>✕</button
- >
- </form>
+ <button
+ class="btn btn-sm btn-circle btn-ghost absolute right-2 top-2"
+ on:click={() => {
+ lm.isDeleteModalOpen = false;
+ lm.pendingDeleteId = '';
+ }}
+ on:keydown={(e) => {
+ if (e.key === 'Escape') {
+ lm.isDeleteModalOpen = false;
+ lm.pendingDeleteId = '';
+ }
+ }}
+ >✕</button>Also, add keyboard event handling to the dialog element:
<dialog
class="modal max-w-full p-4"
class:modal-open={lm.isDeleteModalOpen}
+ on:keydown={(e) => {
+ if (e.key === 'Escape') {
+ lm.isDeleteModalOpen = false;
+ lm.pendingDeleteId = '';
+ }
+ }}
+ role="dialog"
+ aria-labelledby="delete-modal-title"
>And add an id to the title:
- <h3 class="text-lg font-bold">Delete Question</h3>
+ <h3 id="delete-modal-title" class="text-lg font-bold">Delete Question</h3>📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| <form method="dialog"> | |
| <button | |
| class="btn btn-sm btn-circle btn-ghost absolute right-2 top-2" | |
| onclick={() => { | |
| lm.isDeleteModalOpen = false; | |
| lm.pendingDeleteId = ''; | |
| }}>✕</button | |
| > | |
| </form> | |
| <dialog | |
| class="modal max-w-full p-4" | |
| class:modal-open={lm.isDeleteModalOpen} | |
| on:keydown={(e) => { | |
| if (e.key === 'Escape') { | |
| lm.isDeleteModalOpen = false; | |
| lm.pendingDeleteId = ''; | |
| } | |
| }} | |
| role="dialog" | |
| aria-labelledby="delete-modal-title" | |
| > | |
| <h3 id="delete-modal-title" class="text-lg font-bold">Delete Question</h3> | |
| <button | |
| class="btn btn-sm btn-circle btn-ghost absolute right-2 top-2" | |
| on:click={() => { | |
| lm.isDeleteModalOpen = false; | |
| lm.pendingDeleteId = ''; | |
| }} | |
| on:keydown={(e) => { | |
| if (e.key === 'Escape') { | |
| lm.isDeleteModalOpen = false; | |
| lm.pendingDeleteId = ''; | |
| } | |
| }} | |
| >✕</button> | |
| </dialog> |
| <script lang="ts"> | ||
| import { Image, Trash2, Pencil } from 'lucide-svelte'; | ||
| import PaginationControls from './PaginationControls.svelte'; | ||
| let { lm = $bindable() } = $props(); | ||
| </script> | ||
|
|
||
| <div class="rounded-box border border-base-content/12 bg-base-100 mx-6 mb-4"> | ||
| <!-- Table content --> | ||
| <div class="overflow-x-auto"> | ||
| <table class="table"> | ||
| <thead> | ||
| <tr> | ||
| <th>Question</th> | ||
| <th>Options</th> | ||
| <th>Image</th> | ||
| <th>Explanation</th> | ||
| <th>Correct Answer(s)</th> | ||
| <th>Actions</th> | ||
| </tr> | ||
| </thead> | ||
| <tbody> | ||
| {#each lm.paginatedQuestions as question (question.id)} | ||
| <tr> | ||
| <td class="max-w-xs">{question.question_data.question}</td> | ||
| <td class="max-w-xs"> | ||
| {#each question.question_data.options as option (option)} | ||
| <div class="truncate">{option}</div> | ||
| {/each} | ||
| </td> | ||
| <td class="w-24"> | ||
| {#if question.pic_url} | ||
| <div class="avatar"> | ||
| <div class="w-16 rounded"> | ||
| <img src={question.pic_url} alt="Question" /> | ||
| </div> | ||
| </div> | ||
| {:else} | ||
| <div class="text-gray-400"> | ||
| <Image size={24} /> | ||
| </div> | ||
| {/if} | ||
| </td> | ||
| <td class="max-w-xs">{question.question_data.explanation}</td> | ||
| <td> | ||
| {#each question.question_data.correct_answers as answer (answer)} | ||
| <div class="font-mono">{answer}</div> | ||
| {/each} | ||
| </td> | ||
| <td class="flex flex-row space-x-2"> | ||
| <button | ||
| class="btn btn-sm btn-soft btn-error rounded-full" | ||
| onclick={() => { | ||
| lm.pendingDeleteId = question.id; | ||
| lm.isDeleteModalOpen = true; | ||
| }} | ||
| aria-label="Delete question" | ||
| > | ||
| <Trash2 size="16" /> | ||
| </button> | ||
| <button | ||
| class="btn btn-sm btn-soft btn-accent rounded-full" | ||
| onclick={() => lm.openEditModal(question)} | ||
| aria-label="Edit question" | ||
| > | ||
| <Pencil size="16" /> | ||
| </button> | ||
| </td> | ||
| </tr> | ||
| {/each} | ||
| </tbody> | ||
| </table> | ||
| </div> | ||
|
|
||
| <!-- Pagination as table footer --> | ||
| <div class="px-4 py-3 border-t border-base-content/10"> | ||
| <PaginationControls bind:lm /> | ||
| </div> | ||
| </div> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Significant code duplication with questions/components/Table.svelte
This component is nearly identical to src/routes/admin/questions/components/Table.svelte. Consider creating a shared component that can be used by both the questions and challenge pages to avoid maintenance issues.
You could create a shared component in a common location:
src/
components/
tables/
QuestionsTable.svelte # Shared component
Then import and use it in both locations with any specific props needed:
<!-- In both admin/questions and admin/challenge -->
<script>
import QuestionsTable from '$components/tables/QuestionsTable.svelte';
let { lm = $bindable() } = $props();
</script>
<QuestionsTable bind:lm />| let chapters = $derived.by(() => { | ||
| return Array.from(new Set(lm.questions.map((q: AdminChallengeQuestions) => q.chapter))).sort( | ||
| (a, b) => Number(a) - Number(b) | ||
| ); | ||
| }); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Verification agent
🧩 Analysis chain
Potential issue with chapter sorting
The code assumes that chapters can be sorted numerically by parsing them as numbers. This may cause unexpected behavior if chapter identifiers are not strictly numeric or if they're intended to be sorted alphabetically.
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Check what formats chapter identifiers are using in the existing data
# Look for chapter definitions or usages
echo "Chapter identifier formats in the codebase:"
rg -B 2 -A 2 "chapter([ =]|_id|_number)" --type=ts --type=svelte
# Check if there are any chapter identifiers that might not be purely numeric
echo "Non-numeric chapter identifiers in the data models:"
rg "chapter.*[:=].*['\"]" --type=ts --type=svelteLength of output: 392
Below is a revised shell script that bypasses the unrecognized file type error by explicitly searching for Svelte files (and also TypeScript files) using file globbing. This should help us verify whether chapter identifiers include any non-numeric values.
Please run the above script to gather additional verification data. Once we have the updated output, we can decide if the chapter sorting logic needs to be adjusted or if it’s working as intended.
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Search in Svelte files using file extension filtering
echo "Chapter identifier formats in Svelte files:"
rg -g "*.svelte" -B 2 -A 2 "chapter([ =]|_id|_number)"
echo "Non-numeric chapter identifiers in Svelte files:"
rg -g "*.svelte" "chapter.*[:=].*['\"]"
# Also search in TypeScript files if chapter identifiers are defined there.
echo "Chapter identifier formats in TypeScript files:"
rg -g "*.ts" -B 2 -A 2 "chapter([ =]|_id|_number)"
echo "Non-numeric chapter identifiers in TypeScript files:"
rg -g "*.ts" "chapter.*[:=].*['\"]"Length of output: 10172
Action Required: Update Chapter Sorting Logic in Search.svelte
The current implementation in src/routes/admin/questions/components/Search.svelte sorts chapter identifiers by converting them to numbers. However, our verification shows that in several parts of the code (e.g., in logic.svelte.ts files for both questions and challenge), chapters can be non-numeric (often defaulting to an empty string). Converting these values with Number(...) may yield NaN or unintended zeros, causing the sort order to be incorrect when chapters aren’t strictly numeric.
Recommendations:
- Update the sort function: Modify the sorting logic to check if both values are numeric. If so, use numeric subtraction; otherwise, fall back to lexicographical (alphabetical) order.
- Example fix:
.sort((a, b) => { const aNum = Number(a), bNum = Number(b); if (!isNaN(aNum) && !isNaN(bNum)) { return aNum - bNum; } return a.localeCompare(b); });
- Review data consistency: Ensure that the chapter data passed to this component is in the expected format or normalize it prior to sorting to prevent ambiguous behavior.
| class="btn btn-xs btn-primary gap-1" | ||
| onclick={() => lm.addNewCorrectAnswer()} | ||
| type="button" | ||
| > | ||
| <Plus size={14} /> | ||
| <span>Add Correct Answer</span> | ||
| </button> | ||
| </label> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Prevent invalid correct answers.
Enforce at least one valid correct answer if users delete all or fail to add new options.
| lm.searchQuery = urlParams.get('search') || ''; | ||
| lm.currentPage = parseInt(urlParams.get('page') || '1', 10); | ||
| lm.questionsPerPage = parseInt(urlParams.get('perPage') || '10', 10); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
URL state synchronization is correct but repeated.
Reading and updating search, page, and perPage from URL params is appropriate. However, consider extracting this common logic into a reusable helper function or module to avoid duplication across multiple pages.
Also applies to: 53-55, 66-68
| lm.searchQuery = urlParams.get('search') || ''; | ||
| lm.currentPage = parseInt(urlParams.get('page') || '1', 10); | ||
| lm.questionsPerPage = parseInt(urlParams.get('perPage') || '10', 10); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Recommend consolidating duplicated URL logic.
These blocks repeat the steps for reading and writing query params, similar to +page.svelte under admin/challenge. Extracting them into a shared utility would reduce duplication and improve maintainability.
Also applies to: 28-30, 41-43
| // Remove an option from the new question | ||
| removeNewOption(index: number) { | ||
| if (this.newQuestion) { | ||
| // Filter out the option at the specified index | ||
| this.newQuestion.question_data.options = this.newQuestion.question_data.options.filter( | ||
| (_, i) => i !== index | ||
| ); | ||
|
|
||
| // Also remove it from correct answers if it was there | ||
| const optionLetter = this.getLetterFromOption(this.newQuestion.question_data.options[index]); | ||
| this.newQuestion.question_data.correct_answers = | ||
| this.newQuestion.question_data.correct_answers.filter((ans) => ans !== optionLetter); | ||
| } | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Apply the same removal fix for new questions.
Again, capture the target option before filtering it out of the array:
removeNewOption(index: number) {
if (this.newQuestion) {
+ const oldOption = this.newQuestion.question_data.options[index];
this.newQuestion.question_data.options =
this.newQuestion.question_data.options.filter((_, i) => i !== index);
// Also remove it from correct answers if it was there
- const optionLetter = this.getLetterFromOption(
- this.newQuestion.question_data.options[index]
- );
+ const optionLetter = this.getLetterFromOption(oldOption);
this.newQuestion.question_data.correct_answers =
this.newQuestion.question_data.correct_answers.filter(
(ans) => ans !== optionLetter
);
}
}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| // Remove an option from the new question | |
| removeNewOption(index: number) { | |
| if (this.newQuestion) { | |
| // Filter out the option at the specified index | |
| this.newQuestion.question_data.options = this.newQuestion.question_data.options.filter( | |
| (_, i) => i !== index | |
| ); | |
| // Also remove it from correct answers if it was there | |
| const optionLetter = this.getLetterFromOption(this.newQuestion.question_data.options[index]); | |
| this.newQuestion.question_data.correct_answers = | |
| this.newQuestion.question_data.correct_answers.filter((ans) => ans !== optionLetter); | |
| } | |
| } | |
| // Remove an option from the new question | |
| removeNewOption(index: number) { | |
| if (this.newQuestion) { | |
| const oldOption = this.newQuestion.question_data.options[index]; | |
| // Filter out the option at the specified index | |
| this.newQuestion.question_data.options = this.newQuestion.question_data.options.filter( | |
| (_, i) => i !== index | |
| ); | |
| // Also remove it from correct answers if it was there | |
| const optionLetter = this.getLetterFromOption(oldOption); | |
| this.newQuestion.question_data.correct_answers = | |
| this.newQuestion.question_data.correct_answers.filter((ans) => ans !== optionLetter); | |
| } | |
| } |
| // Remove an option at the specified index | ||
| removeOption(index: number) { | ||
| if (this.editingQuestion) { | ||
| // Filter out the option at the specified index | ||
| this.editingQuestion.question_data.options = | ||
| this.editingQuestion.question_data.options.filter((_, i) => i !== index); | ||
|
|
||
| // Also remove it from correct answers if it was there | ||
| const optionToRemove = this.editingQuestion.question_data.options[index]; | ||
| this.editingQuestion.question_data.correct_answers = | ||
| this.editingQuestion.question_data.correct_answers.filter((ans) => ans !== optionToRemove); | ||
| } | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Fix the removal logic referencing a shifted index.
You remove the option first, then reference it at line 158. This ends up reading a different element from the updated array. Capture the item before filtering:
removeOption(index: number) {
if (this.editingQuestion) {
+ const optionToRemove = this.editingQuestion.question_data.options[index];
this.editingQuestion.question_data.options =
this.editingQuestion.question_data.options.filter((_, i) => i !== index);
// Also remove it from correct answers if it was there
- const optionToRemove = this.editingQuestion.question_data.options[index];
this.editingQuestion.question_data.correct_answers =
this.editingQuestion.question_data.correct_answers.filter(
(ans) => ans !== optionToRemove
);
}
}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| // Remove an option at the specified index | |
| removeOption(index: number) { | |
| if (this.editingQuestion) { | |
| // Filter out the option at the specified index | |
| this.editingQuestion.question_data.options = | |
| this.editingQuestion.question_data.options.filter((_, i) => i !== index); | |
| // Also remove it from correct answers if it was there | |
| const optionToRemove = this.editingQuestion.question_data.options[index]; | |
| this.editingQuestion.question_data.correct_answers = | |
| this.editingQuestion.question_data.correct_answers.filter((ans) => ans !== optionToRemove); | |
| } | |
| } | |
| // Remove an option at the specified index | |
| removeOption(index: number) { | |
| if (this.editingQuestion) { | |
| const optionToRemove = this.editingQuestion.question_data.options[index]; | |
| // Filter out the option at the specified index | |
| this.editingQuestion.question_data.options = | |
| this.editingQuestion.question_data.options.filter((_, i) => i !== index); | |
| // Also remove it from correct answers if it was there | |
| this.editingQuestion.question_data.correct_answers = | |
| this.editingQuestion.question_data.correct_answers.filter((ans) => ans !== optionToRemove); | |
| } | |
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (4)
src/routes/admin/questions/components/Table.svelte (4)
21-56: Using Svelte shorthand for event handlers would be more idiomatic.The table implementation is solid, with appropriate key usage in the
eachblocks for optimal rendering. Consider using Svelte's event directive syntax instead of theonclickattribute.- <button - class="btn btn-sm btn-soft btn-error rounded-full" - onclick={() => { - lm.pendingDeleteId = question.id; - lm.isDeleteModalOpen = true; - }} - aria-label="Delete question" - > + <button + class="btn btn-sm btn-soft btn-error rounded-full" + on:click={() => { + lm.pendingDeleteId = question.id; + lm.isDeleteModalOpen = true; + }} + aria-label="Delete question" + >Similarly for the edit button:
- <button - class="btn btn-sm btn-soft btn-accent rounded-full" - onclick={() => lm.openEditModal(question)} - aria-label="Edit question" - > + <button + class="btn btn-sm btn-soft btn-accent rounded-full" + on:click={() => lm.openEditModal(question)} + aria-label="Edit question" + >
21-56: Consider adding a "no data" state for when the table is empty.The table doesn't have a fallback UI for when
lm.paginatedQuestionsis empty. This could lead to a confusing empty table.<tbody> + {#if lm.paginatedQuestions.length === 0} + <tr> + <td colspan="5" class="text-center py-4">No questions found.</td> + </tr> + {:else} {#each lm.paginatedQuestions as question (question.id)} <tr> <!-- existing table row content --> </tr> {/each} + {/if} </tbody>
1-5: Consider adding type definition for the LogicMap interface.The component uses
lmas a LogicMap instance but doesn't explicitly define its type. Adding a type definition would improve code documentation and type safety.<script lang="ts"> import { Trash2, Pencil } from 'lucide-svelte'; import PaginationControls from './PaginationControls.svelte'; + import type { LogicMap } from '../types'; // Adjust the import path as needed let { lm = $bindable() } = $props(); </script>
9-59: Consider implementing table row virtualization for better performance with large datasets.If the number of questions could grow large, implementing virtualization would improve rendering performance by only rendering the visible rows.
Consider using a library like
svelte-virtualor implementing a custom virtualization solution that only renders the visible portion of the table, especially if the dataset could contain hundreds of items.
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Refactor
Chores