Skip to content

[email protected] breaks build ⚠️ #29

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 8, 2016

Conversation

greenkeeperio-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Hello lovely humans,

multiaddr just published its new version 2.0.3.

State Failing tests ⚠️
Dependency multiaddr
New version 2.0.3
Type devDependency

This version is covered by your current version range and after updating it in your project the build kept failing.

It looks like your project, in its current form, is malfunctioning and this update didn’t really change that. I don’t want to leave you in the dark about updates though. I recommend you get your project passing and then check the impact of this update again.

Do you have any ideas how I could improve these pull requests? Did I report anything you think isn’t right?
Are you unsure about how things are supposed to work?

There is a collection of frequently asked questions and while I’m just a bot, there is a group of people who are happy to teach me new things. Let them know.

Good luck with your project ✨

You rock!

🌴


The new version differs by 7 commits .

  • e97eda9 chore: release version v2.0.3
  • 0da0133 chore: update contributors
  • 1c130d4 Merge pull request #23 from multiformats/feature/standardize-readme
  • 45dc630 Standardized Readme
  • 4222846 Merge pull request #24 from multiformats/is-addr
  • 2aa7abb feat: add isMultiaddr method
  • 093665d chore(deps): update them all

See the full diff.


This pull request was created by greenkeeper.io.

Tired of seeing this sponsor message? ⚡ greenkeeper upgrade

@daviddias daviddias merged commit e5f2bc8 into master Sep 8, 2016
@daviddias daviddias deleted the greenkeeper-multiaddr-2.0.3 branch September 8, 2016 00:22
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants