Skip to content

Conversation

@KornevNikita
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@KornevNikita KornevNikita requested a review from a team as a code owner April 16, 2024 08:50
@KornevNikita
Copy link
Contributor Author

if: inputs.tests_selector == 'cts' && (success() || failure())
run: |
./build-cts/bin/test_all --list-devices
./build-cts/bin/test_accessor --list-devices
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

That won't work if that particular test has failed. I'd suggest to list devices/run each tests immediately after that test's build. WDYT?

Copy link
Contributor Author

@KornevNikita KornevNikita Apr 17, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'd probably prefer not to mix the results of "build" and "run".

Updated this string - 79b10c4
https://github.com/intel/llvm/actions/runs/8723745986

@KornevNikita
Copy link
Contributor Author

Unexpectedly Passed Tests (2):
  SYCL :: InvokeSimd/Regression/ImplicitSubgroup/debug_symbols.cpp
  SYCL :: InvokeSimd/Regression/debug_symbols.cpp

#13485

SYCL :: Graph/Explicit/assume_buffer_outlives_graph_property.cpp

#13492

@dm-vodopyanov dm-vodopyanov merged commit c6f5618 into sycl Apr 19, 2024
aelovikov-intel added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 23, 2024
#13421 reduced parellization when
trying to avoid early build failouts. Use `ninja`'s `-k0` to do the same
without undesired side effects.
aelovikov-intel added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 25, 2024
#13421 reduced parellization when
trying to avoid early build failouts. Use `ninja`'s `-k0` to do the same
without undesired side effects. Also run individual tests in parallel as
well.
@bader bader deleted the build-cts-separately branch May 14, 2024 15:59
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants