[refactor] rewrite withRouter()
with full ES class syntax to support ES decorator stage-3
#5
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR adds support for using
withRouter()
as an ECMAScript Decorator (stage-3) while maintaining full backward compatibility with the existing Higher-Order Component (HOC) pattern.Changes Made
Updated the
withRouter()
function to support both usage patterns:NEW: Decorator Usage
EXISTING: HOC Usage (Backward Compatible)
Technical Implementation
useLocation
,useParams
) via a functional wrapper componentValidation
@withRouter
)The implementation allows developers to use modern decorator syntax while ensuring existing code continues to work without modification.
Major changes
withRouter()
with full ES class syntax to support ES decorator stage-3 (Fixes makewithRouter()
working with ECMAScript Decorator stage-3 #4)💡 You can make Copilot smarter by setting up custom instructions, customizing its development environment and configuring Model Context Protocol (MCP) servers. Learn more Copilot coding agent tips in the docs.