Skip to content

Fix fragment name #937

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Nov 3, 2020
Merged

Fix fragment name #937

Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
ed2617e
Fix fragment name
doubledup Oct 20, 2020
2ead4d5
Merge branch 'source' into patch-1
doubledup Nov 3, 2020
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion site/learn/Learn-Schema.md
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -305,7 +305,7 @@ union SearchResult = Human | Droid | Starship

Wherever we return a `SearchResult` type in our schema, we might get a `Human`, a `Droid`, or a `Starship`. Note that members of a union type need to be concrete object types; you can't create a union type out of interfaces or other unions.

In this case, if you query a field that returns the `SearchResult` union type, you need to use a conditional fragment to be able to query any fields at all:
In this case, if you query a field that returns the `SearchResult` union type, you need to use an inline fragment to be able to query any fields at all:

```graphql
# { "graphiql": true}
Expand Down