Skip to content

Consistency table name example with the model name #172

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 18, 2019
Merged

Consistency table name example with the model name #172

merged 1 commit into from
Mar 18, 2019

Conversation

petrus-v
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 91.877% when pulling 742bf8c on petrus-v:patch-1 into 6a96d37 on graphql-python:master.

Nabellaleen
Nabellaleen approved these changes Mar 18, 2019
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Collaborator

@Nabellaleen Nabellaleen left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks !

@Nabellaleen Nabellaleen merged commit 100785a into graphql-python:master Mar 18, 2019
@Nabellaleen Nabellaleen added this to the 2.1.1 milestone Mar 29, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@Nabellaleen Nabellaleen Nabellaleen approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
📖 documentation bug
Projects
None yet
Milestone
2.1.1
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
3 participants
@petrus-v @coveralls @Nabellaleen