Websockets over HTTP/2

[riking]

Is gorilla/websocket going to be doing an experimental implementation of the Websockets+h2 draft, or waiting for it to go RFC?

https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-httpbis-h2-websockets-07

[elithrar]

I hadn’t seen that link! But still very early in the process, and WebSockets + HTTP/2 have been in limbo for a while. My confidence that this goes ahead in the next 6 months is low. I can say that no work is *planned*, although Gary may have thought about it. Saying all of that: we are open to design documents laying out what needs to be added and changed to support WS over HTTP/2.

…

On Sun, Aug 26, 2018 at 10:07 AM Kane York ***@***.***> wrote: Is gorilla/websocket going to be doing an experimental implementation of the Websockets+h2 draft, or waiting for it to go RFC? https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-httpbis-h2-websockets-07 — You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#417>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AABIcGGAx_3gGKGhO31_v_leTWHoFHtwks5uUtW5gaJpZM4WM3CD> .

[riking]

Yes, I was alerted to this via the blink-dev Intent To Ship where they say Mozilla also intends to implement it.

Intent to Implement: https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/topic/blink-dev/TQN4jWHydTk/discussion
Intent to Ship: https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/topic/blink-dev/7MCjXU3zmCQ/discussion
Chrome tracking bug: https://crbug.com/801564
Firefox tracking bug: (not very active, but Intent to Ship thread contains verbal confirmation that Mozilla is working on it) https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1434137

This probably isn't shipping before the end of the year, no.

[nhooyr]

This would require support from net/http for the CONNECT method protocol extension.

[nhooyr]

Some discussion also at coder/websocket#4