-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13
Feat: add support for Python 3.14 #321
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
16 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
0895d92
updates trove classifier
chalmerlowe fe34053
feat: Add constraints file for Python 3.14
chalmerlowe 05194eb
ci: Add Python 3.14 to GitHub Actions workflow
chalmerlowe 72667c9
fix(kokoro): Preserve NOX_SESSION in presubmit.cfg
chalmerlowe e265568
feat(ci): Add Python 3.14 support
chalmerlowe 3047e61
🦉 Updates from OwlBot post-processor
gcf-owl-bot[bot] 7c31e84
ci: Re-add Python 3.14 to unittest matrix
chalmerlowe 2a9b3a4
🦉 Updates from OwlBot post-processor
gcf-owl-bot[bot] 275d0d7
fix(owlbot): Use kwargs to control python versions in templates
chalmerlowe 5148459
🦉 Updates from OwlBot post-processor
gcf-owl-bot[bot] 44a5cd5
fix(owlbot): Ensure noxfile.py skips cpp impl for 3.14
chalmerlowe c66e25c
Apply suggestion from @chalmerlowe
chalmerlowe 7982e08
🦉 Updates from OwlBot post-processor
gcf-owl-bot[bot] 3bb4d1f
Apply suggestion from @chalmerlowe
chalmerlowe ed3d2d3
Apply suggestion from @chalmerlowe
chalmerlowe 4a20612
🦉 Updates from OwlBot post-processor
gcf-owl-bot[bot] File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
Some comments aren't visible on the classic Files Changed page.
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Empty file.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
is this replacement necessary? If the noxfile is a template, I thought this would happen automatically
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The noxfile is a template, but it does not (yet) include the update for cpp related runs.
I am gonna see what it takes to add that to the templating process (which is not just a straight template, it involves some logic that synthtool uses to generate parts of the noxfile on the fly.)