Skip to content

Conversation

@broady
Copy link
Contributor

@broady broady commented Sep 16, 2018

Found via https://twitter.com/iaincollins/status/1040247045246930946
"I ran into the Google Cloud SDK documentation (and code examples!) using MM-DD-YYYY yesterday"

Docs state:
"A timestamp when this policy will expire. Any value given is passed to new Date()."

Found via https://twitter.com/iaincollins/status/1040247045246930946
"I ran into the Google Cloud SDK documentation (and code examples!) using MM-DD-YYYY yesterday"

Docs state:
"A timestamp when this policy will expire. Any value given is passed to new Date()."
@ghost ghost assigned broady Sep 16, 2018
@googlebot googlebot added the cla: yes This human has signed the Contributor License Agreement. label Sep 16, 2018
@broady
Copy link
Contributor Author

broady commented Sep 16, 2018

  • Tests and linter pass
  • Code coverage does not decrease (if any source code was changed)
  • Appropriate docs were updated (if necessary)

@broady
Copy link
Contributor Author

broady commented Sep 16, 2018

Wow, screw you, linter:

/home/node/project/samples/files.js
  342:27  error  Replace `(1000·*·60·*·60)` with `1000·*·60·*·60`  prettier/prettier

Fine, I'll replace the readable code with less readable code.

Copy link
Contributor

@JustinBeckwith JustinBeckwith left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @broady :)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

cla: yes This human has signed the Contributor License Agreement.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants