feat: add StorageNonBlockingChannelUtils #3236
Closed
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
product-auto-label
bot
added
size: l
BenWhitehead
force-pushed
the
nonblocking-appendable/15/docs-channel-nonblocking
branch
from
9760fa3 to
6a1ad12
Compare
BenWhitehead
force-pushed
the
nonblocking-appendable/16/nonblocking-helpers
branch
2 times, most recently
from
17f2a60 to
4ad4352
Compare
BenWhitehead
force-pushed
the
nonblocking-appendable/15/docs-channel-nonblocking
branch
from
6a1ad12 to
c7de523
Compare
BenWhitehead
force-pushed
the
nonblocking-appendable/16/nonblocking-helpers
branch
from
4ad4352 to
55be17a
Compare
BenWhitehead
force-pushed
the
nonblocking-appendable/15/docs-channel-nonblocking
branch
from
c7de523 to
62846d4
Compare
Move existing Buffers.{emptyTo,fillFrom} over to StorageNonBlockingChannelUtils, prefix their method names with `blocking`. Add new tests for the methods, and move the existing methods from BuffersTest that make sense.
BenWhitehead
force-pushed
the
nonblocking-appendable/16/nonblocking-helpers
branch
from
55be17a to
fc83080
Compare
BrandonY
approved these changes
Aug 12, 2025
| * | ||
| * <pre>{@code | ||
| * try (AppendableUploadWriteableByteChannel channel = session.open()) { | ||
| * int written = StorageNonBlockingChannelUtils.blockingEmptyTo(byteBuffer, channel); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Ni: it's weird that "Non blocking utils" has blocking utility methods.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
s/StorageNonBlockingChannelUtils/StorageChannelUtils/g?
BenWhitehead
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 20, 2025
## Description feat: *breaking behavior* rewrite Storage.blobAppendableUpload to be non-blocking and have improved throughput (#3231) Rewrite internals of BlobAppendableUpload to provide non-blocking write calls, and it take advantage of grpc async message handling. When `AppendableUploadWriteableByteChannel#write(ByteBuffer)` is called, an attempt will be made to enqueue the bytes in the outbound queue to GCS. If there is only enough room to partially consume the bytes provided in the `ByteBuffer` the write call will return early specifying the number of bytes actually consumed. As acknowledgements come in from gcs, enqueued messages will be evicted freeing space in the outbound queue. Thereby allowing more bytes to be consumed and enqueued. Given appendable objects are still in private preview I can't quote any metrics here, however preliminary benchmarking of several million objects across a range of sizes show across the board throughput improvments. Because the channel's write call is now non-blocking, if you want to block your application until the full buffer is consumed some new helper methods have been added in StorageChannelUtils to provide blocking behavior. A new method `MinFlushSizeFlushPolicy#withMaxPendingBytes(long)` has been added to allow limiting the number of pending outbound bytes. The default values is 16MiB, but can be configured lower if necessary. ## Release Notes BEGIN_COMMIT_OVERRIDE BEGIN_NESTED_COMMIT feat: *breaking behavior* rewrite Storage.blobAppendableUpload to be non-blocking and have improved throughput (#3231) END_NESTED_COMMIT BEGIN_NESTED_COMMIT feat: add StorageChannelUtils to provide helper methods to perform blocking read/write to/from non-blocking channels (#3231) END_NESTED_COMMIT BEGIN_NESTED_COMMIT feat: add MinFlushSizeFlushPolicy#withMaxPendingBytes(long) (#3231) END_NESTED_COMMIT BEGIN_NESTED_COMMIT fix: update BlobAppendableUploadConfig and FlushPolicy.MinFlushSizeFlushPolicy to default to 4MiB minFlushSize and 16MiB maxPendingBytes (#3249) END_NESTED_COMMIT BEGIN_NESTED_COMMIT fix: make FlushPolicy${Min,Max}FlushSizeFlushPolicy constructors private (#3217) END_NESTED_COMMIT END_COMMIMT_OVERRIDE ## Sub PRs This PR is made of up the following PRs, in sequence 1. #3217 2. #3218 3. #3219 4. #3220 5. #3221 6. #3222 7. #3223 8. #3224 9. #3225 10. #3226 11. #3227 12. #3228 13. #3229 14. #3230 15. #3235 16. #3236 17. #3241 18. #3242 19. #3246 20. #3248 21. #3249 22. #3252
|
Merged in #3231 |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Move existing Buffers.{emptyTo,fillFrom} over to StorageNonBlockingChannelUtils, prefix their method names with
blocking. Add new tests for the methods, and move the existing methods from BuffersTest that make sense.