Skip to content

fmt: display contained values when formatting atomic booleans and integers #54744

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

jamespwilliams
Copy link

@jamespwilliams jamespwilliams commented Aug 29, 2022

  • treat atomic.{Int32,Int64,Uint32,Uint64} values as integers when
    formatting, using the underlying integer value (by calling Load). This
    has the effect of, for example, formatting an atomic integer type
    containing 42 as "42", not "{{}, 42}".

  • treat atomic.Bool values as booleans when formatting, using the
    contained boolean value (by calling Load). This has the effect of, for
    example, formatting a true atomic.Bool value containing as "true",
    not "{{}, 1}" or "{{} %!t(uint32=1)}" as before.

Fixes #54731

…egers

* treat `atomic.{Int32,Int64,Uint32,Uint64}` values as integers when
  formatting, using the underlying integer value (by calling Load). This
  has the effect of, for example, formatting an atomic integer type
  containing 42 as "42", not "{{}, 42}").

* treat `atomic.Bool` values as booleans when formatting, using the
  contained boolean value (by calling Load). This has the effect of, for
  example, formatting an true atomic.Bool value containing as "true",
  not "{{}, 1}" or "{{} %!t(uint32=1)}" as before.

Fixes golang#54731
@google-cla
Copy link

google-cla bot commented Aug 29, 2022

Thanks for your pull request! It looks like this may be your first contribution to a Google open source project. Before we can look at your pull request, you'll need to sign a Contributor License Agreement (CLA).

View this failed invocation of the CLA check for more information.

For the most up to date status, view the checks section at the bottom of the pull request.

@gopherbot
Copy link
Contributor

This PR (HEAD: a9ee026) has been imported to Gerrit for code review.

Please visit https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/426456 to see it.

Tip: You can toggle comments from me using the comments slash command (e.g. /comments off)
See the Wiki page for more info

@gopherbot
Copy link
Contributor

Message from Gopher Robot:

Patch Set 1:

Congratulations on opening your first change. Thank you for your contribution!

Next steps:
A maintainer will review your change and provide feedback. See
https://go.dev/doc/contribute#review for more info and tips to get your
patch through code review.

Most changes in the Go project go through a few rounds of revision. This can be
surprising to people new to the project. The careful, iterative review process
is our way of helping mentor contributors and ensuring that their contributions
have a lasting impact.

During May-July and Nov-Jan the Go project is in a code freeze, during which
little code gets reviewed or merged. If a reviewer responds with a comment like
R=go1.11 or adds a tag like "wait-release", it means that this CL will be
reviewed as part of the next development cycle. See https://go.dev/s/release
for more details.


Please don’t reply on this GitHub thread. Visit golang.org/cl/426456.
After addressing review feedback, remember to publish your drafts!

@gopherbot
Copy link
Contributor

Message from Martin Möhrmann:

Patch Set 1:

(1 comment)


Please don’t reply on this GitHub thread. Visit golang.org/cl/426456.
After addressing review feedback, remember to publish your drafts!

@gopherbot
Copy link
Contributor

Message from Keith Randall:

Patch Set 1:

(1 comment)


Please don’t reply on this GitHub thread. Visit golang.org/cl/426456.
After addressing review feedback, remember to publish your drafts!

@gopherbot
Copy link
Contributor

Message from Cuong Manh Le:

Patch Set 1:

(1 comment)


Please don’t reply on this GitHub thread. Visit golang.org/cl/426456.
After addressing review feedback, remember to publish your drafts!

@gopherbot
Copy link
Contributor

Message from Martin Möhrmann:

Patch Set 1:

(1 comment)


Please don’t reply on this GitHub thread. Visit golang.org/cl/426456.
After addressing review feedback, remember to publish your drafts!

@gopherbot
Copy link
Contributor

Message from Michael Knyszek:

Patch Set 1:

(1 comment)


Please don’t reply on this GitHub thread. Visit golang.org/cl/426456.
After addressing review feedback, remember to publish your drafts!

@gopherbot
Copy link
Contributor

Message from Rob Pike:

Patch Set 1:

(1 comment)


Please don’t reply on this GitHub thread. Visit golang.org/cl/426456.
After addressing review feedback, remember to publish your drafts!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

fmt,sync/atomic: fmt functions should allow integer verbs for atomic integers
2 participants