Closed
Description
What version of Go are you using (go version
)?
go version go1.10 linux/amd64
Does this issue reproduce with the latest release?
yes
What operating system and processor architecture are you using (go env
)?
GOARCH="amd64"
GOBIN=""
GOCACHE="/home/vagrant/.cache/go-build"
GOEXE=""
GOHOSTARCH="amd64"
GOHOSTOS="linux"
GOOS="linux"
GOPATH="/home/vagrant/workspace-dss"
GORACE=""
GOROOT="/usr/local/go-1.10"
GOTMPDIR=""
GOTOOLDIR="/usr/local/go-1.10/pkg/tool/linux_amd64"
GCCGO="gccgo"
CC="gcc"
CXX="g++"
CGO_ENABLED="1"
CGO_CFLAGS="-g -O2"
CGO_CPPFLAGS=""
CGO_CXXFLAGS="-g -O2"
CGO_FFLAGS="-g -O2"
CGO_LDFLAGS="-g -O2"
PKG_CONFIG="pkg-config"
GOGCCFLAGS="-fPIC -m64 -pthread -fmessage-length=0 -fdebug-prefix-map=/tmp/go-build161669454=/tmp/go-build -gno-record-gcc-switches"
What did you do?
It's may also be reproduced by examining the call stack of a panic. For example:
https://play.golang.org/p/579SSX2Vx5t
What did you expect to see?
hi
panic: stack trace
goroutine 1 [running]:
main.Func.Bar(0x11d5a8, 0x1738e0)
/tmp/sandbox941741331/main.go:19 +0x60
main.Func.Foo(0x1040c128, 0x0)
/tmp/sandbox941741331/main.go:11 +0x40
main.main()
/tmp/sandbox941741331/main.go:25 +0x80
What did you see instead?
hi
panic: stack trace
goroutine 1 [running]:
main.Func.Bar(0x11d5a8, 0x1738e0)
/tmp/sandbox941741331/main.go:19 +0x60
main.(Func).Bar-fm()
/tmp/sandbox941741331/main.go:24 +0x40
main.Func.Foo(0x1040c128, 0x0)
/tmp/sandbox941741331/main.go:11 +0x40
main.main()
/tmp/sandbox941741331/main.go:25 +0x80
This is a problem for code that expects to reliably count frames on the stack based on the function calls actually made (e.g. logging modules that want to track file/line of the caller). When artificial frames are injected into the call stack (due to passing around a function reference and later invoking it) this becomes confusing and hard to deal with when attempting to determine the file/line of the caller. It also seems semantically incorrect: the assignment of func Bar to a variable IS NOT a call to the function, so it should not be in the caller stack.