-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.9k
Fix duplicate Reviewed-by trailers #24796
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
silverwind
merged 5 commits into
go-gitea:main
from
corytodd:corytodd/fix-duplicated-approvers
Jun 9, 2023
Merged
Changes from 3 commits
Commits
Show all changes
5 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
8031b34
Fix duplicate Reviewed-by trailers
970d85e
Add tests for FindReviews and GetApprovers
bdba85b
Constraint FindReviews with condition
df4a520
Introduce FindLatestReviews
f039f54
Merge branch 'main' into corytodd/fix-duplicated-approvers
GiteaBot File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -10,6 +10,7 @@ import ( | |
issues_model "code.gitea.io/gitea/models/issues" | ||
"code.gitea.io/gitea/models/unittest" | ||
user_model "code.gitea.io/gitea/models/user" | ||
"code.gitea.io/gitea/modules/setting" | ||
|
||
"github.com/stretchr/testify/assert" | ||
) | ||
|
@@ -325,3 +326,14 @@ func TestParseCodeOwnersLine(t *testing.T) { | |
assert.Equal(t, g.Tokens, tokens, "Codeowners tokenizer failed") | ||
} | ||
} | ||
|
||
func TestGetApprovers(t *testing.T) { | ||
assert.NoError(t, unittest.PrepareTestDatabase()) | ||
pr := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &issues_model.PullRequest{ID: 5}) | ||
// Official reviews are already deduplicated. Allow unofficial reviews | ||
// to assert that there are no duplicated approvers. | ||
setting.Repository.PullRequest.DefaultMergeMessageOfficialApproversOnly = false | ||
approvers := pr.GetApprovers() | ||
expected := "Reviewed-by: User Five <[email protected]>\nReviewed-by: User Six <[email protected]>\n" | ||
assert.EqualValues(t, expected, approvers) | ||
} |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
After reading the code again, I think it's better to add a
FindLatestReviews
, instead of addingLatestOnly
to FindReviewOptions.The reason is, the newly added
LatestOnly
is not respected bytoCond
, butFindReviewOptions
is shared byFindReviewOptions
andCountReviewOptions
. So, if LatestOnly=true, FindReviewOptions and CountReviewOptions behave differently, it would cause bugs or confuse developers in the future.If we introduce a
FindLatestReviews
, then everything is clear.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That's a very good point, thanks for the feedback. I've made the requested revisions.