-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.3k
Show Team Seats that block individuals from being in the Usage-Based Free tier #12805
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
/werft run 👍 started the job as gitpod-build-gpl-12758-list-plans.2 |
e018679
to
450dbee
Compare
started the job as gitpod-build-gpl-12758-list-plans.4 because the annotations in the pull request description changed |
/werft run 👍 started the job as gitpod-build-gpl-12758-list-plans.5 |
bb0b809
to
196e907
Compare
This pull request has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions. |
196e907
to
253cf56
Compare
253cf56
to
19aa7da
Compare
started the job as gitpod-build-gpl-12758-list-plans.10 because the annotations in the pull request description changed |
19aa7da
to
c1d4bd1
Compare
@gtsiolis It would be awesome if you could have a look at the visual changes. Happy to take up any none-trivial changes in a follow-up. But do note that this is 1.) a very temporary problem, 2.) for only a subset of our users, so not worth investing tons of time into. 🧘 |
Looking at this now! 👀 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for tackling this, @geropl! 🔮
This could probably also resolve #3948 and #5977. 🏓 🏓
Feels like this PR is tackling two things in one step, which could increase the scope of changes and review time, however the size of code changes looks like an MVC! 🛹
Left some thoughts and comments, let's open any follow-up issue for any of the suggestion that significantly increase the scope of the changes or time to merge this. ⏱️
(userBillingMode.teamNames || []).map((tn) => <li>{tn}</li>)} | ||
</ul> | ||
</InfoBox> | ||
)} | ||
<InfoBox className="w-2/3 mt-14 mx-auto"> | ||
If you are interested in purchasing a plan for a team, purchase a Team plan with one centralized |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
question: Since team plans are no longer available and team billing is the only option available for new teams, does it make sense to drop this nudge here altogether?
…ons if that blocks UBP
c1d4bd1
to
18151c7
Compare
/werft run 👍 started the job as gitpod-build-gpl-12758-list-plans.13 |
18151c7
to
72ea0ee
Compare
Description
If users are already member of a paid Chargebee team, and not part of a UBP team yet, their move to UBP (free tier) is blocked. This PR shows the team names of those who are actually blocking.
We can use this in two ways:
Related Issue(s)
Fixes #12758
How to test
Release Notes
Documentation
Werft options: