Skip to content

Conversation

@asgerf
Copy link
Contributor

@asgerf asgerf commented Jun 29, 2023

It looks like this causes OOM on some projects, so opening this in case we need to revert.

The OOMs were technically reported by DCA but in a somewhat confusing way.

or
call = activeRecordConnectionInstance().getAMethodCall("execute") and
sink = call.getArgument(0)
/** The `ActiveRecordModelClass` of the receiver of this method. */

Check warning

Code scanning / CodeQL

Predicate QLDoc style.

The QLDoc for a predicate with a result should start with 'Gets'.
@asgerf asgerf marked this pull request as ready for review June 30, 2023 08:24
@asgerf asgerf requested review from a team as code owners June 30, 2023 08:24
@asgerf asgerf merged commit 133de56 into main Jun 30, 2023
@asgerf asgerf deleted the revert-13496-rb/tracking-on-demand branch June 30, 2023 08:41
asgerf added a commit to asgerf/codeql that referenced this pull request Jul 7, 2023
…racking-on-demand"

This reverts commit 133de56, reversing
changes made to 28a8e48.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants