Skip to content

Conversation

asottile-sentry
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@asottile-sentry asottile-sentry requested review from a team June 17, 2024 21:03
@asottile-sentry asottile-sentry requested a review from a team as a code owner June 17, 2024 21:03
@github-actions github-actions bot added the Scope: Backend Automatically applied to PRs that change backend components label Jun 17, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@saponifi3d saponifi3d left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🙏 thanks for this cleanup!

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 18, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 78.04%. Comparing base (29ff72e) to head (a07b78d).
Report is 16 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master   #72895      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   73.27%   78.04%   +4.76%     
==========================================
  Files        6602     6604       +2     
  Lines      294280   294420     +140     
  Branches    50731    50757      +26     
==========================================
+ Hits       215645   229781   +14136     
+ Misses      72049    58304   -13745     
+ Partials     6586     6335     -251     
Files Coverage Δ
src/sentry/rules/processing/delayed_processing.py 86.03% <100.00%> (ø)

... and 845 files with indirect coverage changes

@asottile-sentry asottile-sentry merged commit 0d13bad into master Jun 18, 2024
@asottile-sentry asottile-sentry deleted the asottile-typing-sentry-rules branch June 18, 2024 13:51
@github-actions github-actions bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Jul 4, 2024
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
Scope: Backend Automatically applied to PRs that change backend components
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants