-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 20
Support power requests from shifting actors in the PowerManager #957
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
10 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
2ad660f
Document the usage of component pools for interacting with components
shsms b6d1159
Rename `_add_bounds_tracker` → `_add_system_bounds_tracker`
shsms ab22157
Add a `get_target_power` method to PowerManager algorithms
shsms 437487e
Accept a `in_shifting_group` parameter, when creating a `*_pool`
shsms aab52be
Handle proposals from power shifting actors in the PowerManager
shsms 0b71dad
Test the support for shifting actors in the PowerManager
shsms 44be580
Document how to use shifting groups the shift the target power
shsms fc889ee
Update release notes
shsms cff11b9
Update src/frequenz/sdk/microgrid/__init__.py
shsms bf2e8a2
Rename `_calculate_remaining_bounds` to `_calculate_shifted_bounds`
shsms File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Not going to insist a lot on this because I don't want to keep focusing on bikeshedding, but I though it out there just in case you agree it could bring some extra clarity. Back to my previous suggestion of grouping the groups, what about having something like:
?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If we end up adding more than two groups, I think it makes sense to refactor at that time. For now, I'm not sure it is worth the effort, the code is not really that complicated the way it is.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I created an issue just so it doesn't get lost, but I agree is OK as it is for now: