fix(forge): list cache files that are saved as block numbers for cache ls
#7270
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
penandlim
requested review from
DaniPopes,
Evalir and
mattsse
as code owners
This was referenced Apr 26, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Motivation
Some time ago, after this PR 4ae40da#diff-61de971a1475be0209ee9896ce71d6b3424904b26eb2ea0227d1ff23ee4e6e6bL585-L587
the rpc cache location was changed from
~/.foundry/cache/rpc/[chain]/[blockNumber]/storage.jsonto
~/.foundry/cache/rpc/[chain]/[blockNumber]However the
cache lsfunction was not updated with this change.This resulted
forge cache lslisting very old caches that are not used anymore, but ignoring the newer caches as they are not directories.Example:
Running
forge cache lswith forge 0.2.0 (43b4e23 2024-02-25T00:21:15.546682000Z)Note that the RPC caches are ignored in above output and the total sizes are do not include them.
Solution
Don't ignore files that are numeric only in their names when listing caches.
RPC caches are included and the total size of the cache is correctly displayed as well.