-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 122
time.h: fix integer overflow in MsToAbsoluteTimespec() on 32-bit architectures #1042
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
6 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
c97c17a
app/src/time.h: Fix MsToAbsoluteTimespec() on 32-bit architectures
dconeybe b200767
add changelog entry
dconeybe fc5073e
app/src/time.h: remove includes that were left behind from log-based …
dconeybe e0a0f79
release_build_files/readme.md: update the change log entry
dconeybe b104910
app/src/time.h: use modulo operator
dconeybe b6a34b2
app/tests/time_test.cc: add a comment about the integer overflow bug …
dconeybe File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Do these value test for previous overflow scenarios?
If so a comment saying that this tests for overlfow on 32 bit systems would be helpful.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
As long as the test gets run on a 32-bit architecture it will detect the overflow. I'm not sure how our GitHub Actions are set up and if they trigger these tests on 32-bit platforms. I've opened a temporary PR #1043 to see if any of the GitHub Actions fail.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I've also added this inline comment to time_test.cc:
This test verifies the fix for the old integer overflow bug on 32-bit architectures: #1042.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I've verified the fix using GitHub Actions in #1043