docs: Fix ambiguous phrasing regarding HeroPublicWithTeam model

[berkaykrc]

Description

I noticed a sentence in the Models with Relationships section that was slightly ambiguous and caused confusion about which model was being described.

In the paragraph discussing recursion, the text says:

"Also, notice that the field team is not declared with this new TeamPublicWithHeroes..."

Because the sentence omits the subject (the HeroPublicWithTeam class), it reads as if the text is describing a field inside TeamPublicWithHeroes, rather than explaining how the team field is typed inside the Hero model.

Changes

I have updated the text to explicitly state that we are looking at the HeroPublicWithTeam model.

Example of clarification:

Before: "Also, notice that the field team is not declared with this new TeamPublicWithHeroes..."

After: "Also, notice that in the HeroPublicWithTeam model, the field team is not declared with this new TeamPublicWithHeroes class..."

This small change reduces cognitive load and prevents readers from looking for a logic error in TeamPublicWithHeroes.

[github-actions]

📝 Docs preview

Last commit 9f5b872 at: https://eb71621d.sqlmodel.pages.dev

Modified Pages

• https://eb71621d.sqlmodel.pages.dev/tutorial/fastapi/relationships/ - (before)