Skip to content

Conversation

@jiegillet
Copy link
Contributor

Big bro is here.

New practice exercise

Revert "New practice exercise"

This reverts commit f625dfe.
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

Thank you for contributing to exercism/elixir 💜 🎉. This is an automated PR comment 🤖 for the maintainers of this repository that helps with the PR review process. You can safely ignore it and wait for a maintainer to review your changes.

Based on the files changed in this PR, it would be good to pay attention to the following details when reviewing the PR:

  • General steps

    • 🏆 Does this PR need to receive a label with a reputation modifier (x:size/{tiny,small,medium,large,massive})? (A medium reputation amount is awarded by default, see docs)
  • Any exercise changed

    • 👤 Does the author of the PR need to be added as an author or contributor in <exercise>/.meta/config.json (see docs)?
    • 🔬 Do the analyzer and the analyzer comments exist for this exercise? Do they need to be changed?
    • 📜 Does the design file (<exercise>/.meta/design.md) need to be updated to document new implementation decisions?
  • Practice exercise changed

    • 🌲 Do prerequisites, practices, and difficulty in config.json need to be updated?
    • 🧑‍🏫 Are the changes in accordance with the community-wide problem specifiations?
  • Practice exercise tests changed

    • ⚪️ Are all tests except the first one skipped?
    • 📜 Does <exercise>/.meta/tests.toml need updating?

Automated comment created by PR Commenter 🤖.

@angelikatyborska angelikatyborska added the x:size/large Large amount of work label Jul 1, 2021
Copy link
Contributor

@neenjaw neenjaw left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No concerns here, agree with @angelikatyborska suggest

Co-authored-by: Angelika Tyborska <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

x:size/large Large amount of work

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants