Skip to content

Conversation

@davesque
Copy link
Contributor

What was wrong?

I was finding the merge_args_and_kwargs utility function to be hard to understand without a fair bit of effort. I also noticed a couple of minor inefficiencies in the implementation.

How was it fixed?

Added an explanatory docstring, comments, useful whitespace, and made some minor refactors to improve readability and efficiency.

Cute Animal Picture

Put a link to a cute animal picture inside the parenthesis-->

@davesque
Copy link
Contributor Author

@pipermerriam That's funny. When I saw that @kclowes was requested to review this, I thought I had done that myself. Then I thought I should request a review from you as well just for good measure. Since you actually requested the review, I'll just assume you were delegating to her on this one. :)

@davesque davesque removed the request for review from pipermerriam January 31, 2019 06:05
Copy link
Collaborator

@kclowes kclowes left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💥 looks good, thanks!

@davesque davesque merged commit c4de474 into ethereum:master Jan 31, 2019
@davesque davesque deleted the merge-args-kwargs branch February 1, 2019 22:44
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants