Skip to content

Conversation

kripken
Copy link
Member

@kripken kripken commented Nov 8, 2018

And remove previous (partial) workaround code for it.

Fixes #7472

Copy link
Member

@dschuff dschuff left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM. Seems odd that we have to declare Math builtins to closure though?

@kripken
Copy link
Member Author

kripken commented Nov 9, 2018

Yeah, slightly odd - I assumed it was because our closure is out of date (and fround for example is relatively new), but the same happens on the closure compiler website, which I assume is up to date. I filed an issue.

@juj
Copy link
Collaborator

juj commented Nov 9, 2018

Lgtm, although odd failures in CI - I wonder if they are related?

@kripken
Copy link
Member Author

kripken commented Nov 9, 2018

@juj CI failures are current breakage due to waiting for a new binary tag to be built. But it's possible they are masking real failures from this PR, not landing until we can be sure.

@kripken kripken merged commit d9d4239 into incoming Nov 10, 2018
@kripken kripken deleted the closure-math branch November 10, 2018 14:43
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants