Skip to content

Conversation

sbc100
Copy link
Collaborator

@sbc100 sbc100 commented Sep 20, 2024

We stopped using a separate worker file back in #21701. That was released in 3.1.58 back in April.

This change ends the transition period by no longer generating a dummy/useless worker.js file alongside the output.

@sbc100 sbc100 requested review from dschuff and kripken September 20, 2024 12:31
@sbc100 sbc100 force-pushed the worker_js branch 2 times, most recently from 5229c5b to d9b33dd Compare September 20, 2024 13:58
Copy link
Member

@kripken kripken left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please mention this in the changelog.

We stopped using a separate worker file back in emscripten-core#21701.  That was
released in 3.1.58 back in April.

This change ends the transition period by no longer generating a
dummy/useless worker.js file alongside the output.
@sbc100 sbc100 merged commit a756ff0 into emscripten-core:main Sep 20, 2024
2 of 11 checks passed
@sbc100 sbc100 deleted the worker_js branch September 20, 2024 19:09
sbc100 added a commit to sbc100/emscripten that referenced this pull request Jan 22, 2025
The unused argument in test_export_es6 should have been removed as part
of emscripten-core#22598.
sbc100 added a commit to sbc100/emscripten that referenced this pull request Jan 22, 2025
The unused argument in test_export_es6 should have been removed as part
of emscripten-core#22598.
sbc100 added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 22, 2025
The unused argument in test_export_es6 should have been removed as part
of #22598.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants