-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.4k
Simplify EM_ASM handling #11972
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Simplify EM_ASM handling #11972
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
11 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
75fe681
Update binaryen version
kripken c6863f7
wip [ci skip]
kripken ac72642
fix [ci skip]
kripken 4f58f90
fix [ci skip]
kripken 318e871
reloc [ci skip]
kripken 0b35fca
merge [ci skip]
kripken 19dbd3d
Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/master' into emasmsim
kripken bc9cae8
Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/master' into emasmsim
kripken 0ebf523
comment
kripken a484be5
nicer
kripken c35b844
moar test
kripken File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -1,3 +1,4 @@ | ||
#include <assert.h> | ||
#include <emscripten.h> | ||
#include <stdio.h> | ||
#include <thread> | ||
|
@@ -7,8 +8,15 @@ std::atomic<int> ret; | |
void foo() { | ||
int len = MAIN_THREAD_EM_ASM_INT({ | ||
var elem = document.getElementById('elem'); | ||
window.almost_PI = 3.14159; | ||
return elem.innerText.length; | ||
}); | ||
double almost_PI = MAIN_THREAD_EM_ASM_DOUBLE({ | ||
// read a double from the main thread | ||
return window.almost_PI; | ||
}); | ||
printf("almost PI: %f\n", almost_PI); | ||
assert(fabs(almost_PI - 3.14159) < 0.001); | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. What the changes to the test code? There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Just some added testing. We tested |
||
atomic_store(&ret, len); | ||
} | ||
|
||
|
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This function no longer exists? I guess it was never needed?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, it may have made sense in some old approach to EM_ASM in fastcomp perhaps.