Skip to content

Conversation

karenzone
Copy link
Contributor

@karenzone karenzone commented Apr 14, 2025

What would happen if we skip the docbuild step in the GitHub action so that we can get output in a PR?

Could we push the generated plugin output into a PR? Then the docs-ci on the PR would run and fail because the include_path variable would be over-written with the invalid path from plugin source. BUT, we'd have some output to work with! We'd have a definitive list of changed plugins, and fixing the path using GitHub suggestions would be easy.

Micro goal: Get a PR that contains doc output that I can adjust in order to avoid all of the manual steps required in https://github.com/elastic/logstash-docs-md/issues/16.

@karenzone karenzone self-assigned this Apr 14, 2025
@karenzone karenzone requested a review from mashhurs April 17, 2025 20:48
@karenzone karenzone marked this pull request as ready for review April 17, 2025 20:49
Copy link
Contributor

@mashhurs mashhurs left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Let's try!
lgtm~

@karenzone karenzone merged commit ba35dfc into elastic:main Apr 17, 2025
2 checks passed
@karenzone karenzone deleted the 110-docgen branch April 17, 2025 21:10
@karenzone
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thank you so much for your help with this, @mashhurs! Now, instead of an error log with file names and lots of manual fixes to make, I get a PR that I can make quick fixes on.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants