-
Couldn't load subscription status.
- Fork 5.2k
Ensure hardware intrinsic tests are marked with [Fact] #117347
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Pull Request Overview
This PR marks several hardware intrinsic tests with the [Fact] attribute so they are discovered by xUnit.
- Added
using Xunit;to each test file - Prefixed test methods with
[Fact] - Changed test methods from
privatetopublic
Reviewed Changes
Copilot reviewed 4 out of 4 changed files in this pull request and generated 4 comments.
| File | Description |
|---|---|
| src/tests/JIT/HardwareIntrinsics/X86/Sse2/ConvertToVector128Double.Double.cs | Added [Fact] and made method public |
| src/tests/JIT/HardwareIntrinsics/X86/Sse2/ConvertToUInt64.Vector128UInt64.cs | Added [Fact] and made method public |
| src/tests/JIT/HardwareIntrinsics/X86/Sse2/ConvertToInt64WithTruncation.Vector128Double.cs | Added [Fact] and made method public |
| src/tests/JIT/HardwareIntrinsics/X86/Sse2/ConvertToInt32WithTruncation.Int32.cs | Added [Fact] and made method public |
src/tests/JIT/HardwareIntrinsics/X86/Sse2/ConvertToVector128Double.Double.cs
Show resolved
Hide resolved
src/tests/JIT/HardwareIntrinsics/X86/Sse2/ConvertToUInt64.Vector128UInt64.cs
Show resolved
Hide resolved
src/tests/JIT/HardwareIntrinsics/X86/Sse2/ConvertToInt64WithTruncation.Vector128Double.cs
Show resolved
Hide resolved
src/tests/JIT/HardwareIntrinsics/X86/Sse2/ConvertToInt32WithTruncation.Int32.cs
Show resolved
Hide resolved
|
CC. @dotnet/jit-contrib. Small test fix, just fixing a couple that weren't marked with |
|
Tagging subscribers to this area: @JulieLeeMSFT, @jakobbotsch |
This resolves #113231