Skip to content

Conversation

rzikm
Copy link
Member

@rzikm rzikm commented Jul 11, 2024

Follow up from #103572. Seems like the schedule must be disabled in the particular branch (see https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/devops/pipelines/process/scheduled-triggers?view=azure-devops&tabs=yaml)

Customer Impact

None, test only change to disable scheduled runs of pipelines which have been reliably failing (in the build step) for many months.

Regression

No

Testing

N/A

Risk

Low, test-only change.

@ghost ghost added the needs-area-label An area label is needed to ensure this gets routed to the appropriate area owners label Jul 11, 2024
@rzikm rzikm changed the title Remove release/6.0 from HttpStress [release/6.0] Disable SslStress and HttpStress runs Jul 11, 2024
@rzikm rzikm requested a review from a team July 11, 2024 08:25
@rzikm rzikm added area-System.Net.Http and removed needs-area-label An area label is needed to ensure this gets routed to the appropriate area owners labels Jul 11, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

Tagging subscribers to this area: @dotnet/ncl
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

@ManickaP
Copy link
Member

As this is to 6.0 branch, I think you need to use the template etc.

@rzikm
Copy link
Member Author

rzikm commented Jul 11, 2024

As this is to 6.0 branch, I think you need to use the template etc.

Right, thanks for the reminder

@rzikm
Copy link
Member Author

rzikm commented Jul 11, 2024

/ba-g Test failures are unrelated

@rzikm
Copy link
Member Author

rzikm commented Jul 11, 2024

Test-only change=> tell mode

@rzikm rzikm merged commit 3ab6d0f into release/6.0-staging Jul 12, 2024
@jkotas jkotas deleted the 6.0-no-http-stress branch July 27, 2024 19:30
@github-actions github-actions bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Aug 27, 2024
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

area-System.Net.Http Servicing-approved Approved for servicing release

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants