Skip to content

Conversation

ebepho
Copy link
Contributor

@ebepho ebepho commented Jun 15, 2024

Contributes to #99957

Stress test output:

Passed test: _Sve_r::JIT.HardwareIntrinsics.Arm._Sve.Program.Sve_ConvertToInt64_long_float() : 13
Passed test: _Sve_r::JIT.HardwareIntrinsics.Arm._Sve.Program.Sve_ConvertToInt64_long_double() : 13
Passed test: _Sve_r::JIT.HardwareIntrinsics.Arm._Sve.Program.Sve_ConvertToUInt64_ulong_float() : 13
Passed test: _Sve_r::JIT.HardwareIntrinsics.Arm._Sve.Program.Sve_ConvertToUInt64_ulong_double() : 13
===================Running jitstress===================
------------------- {'JitMinOpts': '1'} -------------------
------------------- {'JitStress': '1'} -------------------
------------------- {'JitStress': '2'} -------------------
------------------- {'JitStress': '1', 'TieredCompilation': '1'} -------------------
------------------- {'JitStress': '2', 'TieredCompilation': '1'} -------------------
------------------- {'TailcallStress': '1'} -------------------
------------------- {'ReadyToRun': '0'} -------------------
===================Running jitstressregs===================
------------------- {'JitStressRegs': '1'} -------------------
------------------- {'JitStressRegs': '2'} -------------------
------------------- {'JitStressRegs': '3'} -------------------
------------------- {'JitStressRegs': '4'} -------------------
------------------- {'JitStressRegs': '8'} -------------------
------------------- {'JitStressRegs': '0x10'} -------------------
------------------- {'JitStressRegs': '0x80'} -------------------
------------------- {'JitStressRegs': '0x1000'} -------------------
------------------- {'JitStressRegs': '0x2000'} -------------------
===================Running jitstress2-jitstressregs===================
------------------- {'JitStress': '2', 'JitStressRegs': '1'} -------------------
------------------- {'JitStress': '2', 'JitStressRegs': '2'} -------------------
------------------- {'JitStress': '2', 'JitStressRegs': '3'} -------------------
------------------- {'JitStress': '2', 'JitStressRegs': '4'} -------------------
------------------- {'JitStress': '2', 'JitStressRegs': '8'} -------------------
------------------- {'JitStress': '2', 'JitStressRegs': '0x10'} -------------------
------------------- {'JitStress': '2', 'JitStressRegs': '0x80'} -------------------
------------------- {'JitStress': '2', 'JitStressRegs': '0x1000'} -------------------
------------------- {'JitStress': '2', 'JitStressRegs': '0x2000'} -------------------

cc @dotnet/arm64-contrib

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Jun 15, 2024

Note regarding the new-api-needs-documentation label:

This serves as a reminder for when your PR is modifying a ref *.cs file and adding/modifying public APIs, please make sure the API implementation in the src *.cs file is documented with triple slash comments, so the PR reviewers can sign off that change.

1 similar comment
@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Jun 15, 2024

Note regarding the new-api-needs-documentation label:

This serves as a reminder for when your PR is modifying a ref *.cs file and adding/modifying public APIs, please make sure the API implementation in the src *.cs file is documented with triple slash comments, so the PR reviewers can sign off that change.

Copy link
Contributor

Tagging subscribers to this area: @dotnet/area-system-runtime-intrinsics
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

@ebepho ebepho changed the title ConvertToint64 and ConvertToUInt64 Arm64/SVE: Implement ConvertToint64 and ConvertToUInt64 Jun 17, 2024
@ebepho ebepho changed the title Arm64/SVE: Implement ConvertToint64 and ConvertToUInt64 Arm64/SVE: Implemented ConvertToint64 and ConvertToUInt64 Jun 17, 2024
}
}";

const string SimpleVecOpTest_ValidationLogicForCndSelForNarrowing = @"for (var i = 0; i < Op1ElementCount; i++)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nit: Can we rename this to SimpleVecOpTest_ValidationLogicForCndSelNarrowing, and do the same for SimpleVecOpTest_ValidationLogicForNarrowing so it's SimpleVecOpTest_ValidationLogicNarrowing? We seem to use the Narrowing suffix on its own elsewhere in the file, so this seems to be a bit more consistent.

@kunalspathak kunalspathak added the arm-sve Work related to arm64 SVE/SVE2 support label Jun 17, 2024
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants