-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4
Remove isOtherLowercase
and isOtherUppercase
from the Character
models
#35
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That's a legitmate simplification as the called method has never been modelled.
To be coherent with other changes to JDK files, please comment out the code instead of removing it and put a comment above it that explains why the code has been commented out.
c0d3fff
to
5edc278
Compare
Hello @peterschrammel. I have implemented the changes you suggested. I'm assuming Travis is dead (or our config is super-broken); does this mean you have to merge manually? |
Can you add a simple github actions configuration to replace it? |
Hi @peterschrammel, yes, absolutely. I will spin one and rebase the current PR on top of the branch that contains it. |
For now it's using a simple platform array (`ubuntu-latest`, Java 16 JDK by Adoptium), but it can be enhanced later to feature support for multiple platforms or JDK versions.
It has gone stale over time and blocks PRs against Models Library from getting merged. Additionally, it has been substituted by a Github Action that has the same effect.
… models. These were removed in upstream commit https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/2846/files and are now creating problems when trying to build the models library with openJDK-17.
5edc278
to
a912257
Compare
Okay, @peterschrammel, a basic config for CI has been added. We could expand it to a more featureful array of platforms/environments, but it can also be done as a later step. What would be your preference? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
One platform is sufficient for now.
Alright @peterschrammel. The travis configuration will need to be removed from the Repository's settings as a required check as well, I believe, and then I should be able to merge. |
Should be ready now. |
These were removed in upstream commit https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/2846/files
and are now creating problems when trying to build the models library with openJDK-17.