Skip to content

BMC: add support for LTL X operator #431

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 3, 2024
Merged

BMC: add support for LTL X operator #431

merged 1 commit into from
Apr 3, 2024

Conversation

kroening
Copy link
Member

@kroening kroening commented Apr 2, 2024

This adds support for the LTL X operator to the BMC engine.

@kroening kroening marked this pull request as ready for review April 2, 2024 19:28
@@ -70,51 +72,77 @@ Function: property

\*******************************************************************/

std::map<std::size_t, exprt::operandst> property_obligations(
void property_obligations_rec(
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should probably be static


\*******************************************************************/

std::map<std::size_t, exprt::operandst> property_obligations(
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should probably always have been static

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can do; I have a nagging feeling that we'll remove these all once we try to do more unit testing.

@kroening kroening force-pushed the BMC-X branch 2 times, most recently from 6057c46 to 12b2ca6 Compare April 3, 2024 16:21
This adds support for the LTL X operator to the BMC engine.
@kroening kroening merged commit 3e4ea73 into main Apr 3, 2024
4 checks passed
@kroening kroening deleted the BMC-X branch April 3, 2024 16:30
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants