Skip to content

Conversation

kroening
Copy link
Collaborator

SVA cover properties pass even when the bound is insufficient to prove them.

@kroening kroening marked this pull request as ready for review April 18, 2025 16:23
@tautschnig
Copy link
Collaborator

Why does this PR have two commits (where the first one is #1068)?

@kroening
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Why does this PR have two commits (where the first one is #1068)?

Without #1068 you can't see this bug, since cover doesn't work.

@kroening kroening force-pushed the cover_sequence2 branch 2 times, most recently from 0dbfa82 to e0b386a Compare April 22, 2025 15:43
@kroening
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Now clearer after rebase.

^SIGNAL=0$
--
^warning: ignoring
--
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Would you mind adding an explanation sentence stating what is (currently) going wrong?

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

done

SVA cover properties pass even when the bound is insufficient to prove them.
@tautschnig tautschnig merged commit 8f62ffc into main Apr 22, 2025
9 checks passed
@tautschnig tautschnig deleted the cover_sequence2 branch April 22, 2025 15:56
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants