Output solver stats on --stop-on-fail

[peterschrammel]

We previously only output it when checking all properties.

• Each commit message has a non-empty body, explaining why the change was made.
• [n/a] Methods or procedures I have added are documented, following the guidelines provided in CODING_STANDARD.md.
• [n/a] The feature or user visible behaviour I have added or modified has been documented in the User Guide in doc/cprover-manual/
• [X Regression or unit tests are included, or existing tests cover the modified code (in this case I have detailed which ones those are in the commit message).
• [n/a] My commit message includes data points confirming performance improvements (if claimed).
• My PR is restricted to a single feature or bugfix.
• [n/a] White-space or formatting changes outside the feature-related changed lines are in commits of their own.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Base: 78.48% // Head: 78.48% // Increases project coverage by +0.00% 🎉

Coverage data is based on head (04b527c) compared to base (f76d7fa).
Patch coverage: 100.00% of modified lines in pull request are covered.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff            @@
##           develop    #7485   +/-   ##
========================================
  Coverage    78.48%   78.48%           
========================================
  Files         1663     1663           
  Lines       191188   191189    +1     
========================================
+ Hits        150054   150055    +1     
  Misses       41134    41134           

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
src/goto-checker/stop_on_fail_verifier.h	78.57% <100.00%> (+0.79%)	⬆️

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report at Codecov.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

[tautschnig]

After looking at the code some more I can see that/why this works, but I find it rather subtle. Would it perhaps be better to copy what multi_path_symex_checkert::report() does?

[peterschrammel]

I'm mirroring what we already do in all_properties_verifier.
It was forgotten to add the report() call to this verifier too.