Skip to content

switch codebuild from clang 7 to clang 8 #4746

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jun 5, 2019
Merged

Conversation

kroening
Copy link
Member

@kroening kroening commented Jun 4, 2019

This is to catch problems as in #4744.

  • Each commit message has a non-empty body, explaining why the change was made.
  • n/a Methods or procedures I have added are documented, following the guidelines provided in CODING_STANDARD.md.
  • n/a The feature or user visible behaviour I have added or modified has been documented in the User Guide in doc/cprover-manual/
  • n/a Regression or unit tests are included, or existing tests cover the modified code (in this case I have detailed which ones those are in the commit message).
  • n/a My commit message includes data points confirming performance improvements (if claimed).
  • n/a My PR is restricted to a single feature or bugfix.
  • n/a White-space or formatting changes outside the feature-related changed lines are in commits of their own.

@tautschnig
Copy link
Collaborator

As noted on #4744, the Clang 8 build appears to be passing without changes. @kroening can you confirm that Clang 8 is genuinely being used in the build (I don't have access to the Clang 8 build log).

@tautschnig tautschnig assigned kroening and unassigned tautschnig Jun 4, 2019
Copy link
Contributor

@allredj allredj left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

✔️
Passed Diffblue compatibility checks (cbmc commit: 4a83428).
Build URL: https://travis-ci.com/diffblue/test-gen/builds/114238943

@codecov-io
Copy link

Codecov Report

❗ No coverage uploaded for pull request base (develop@d8598f8). Click here to learn what that means.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             develop    #4746   +/-   ##
==========================================
  Coverage           ?   68.44%           
==========================================
  Files              ?     1270           
  Lines              ?   104828           
  Branches           ?        0           
==========================================
  Hits               ?    71753           
  Misses             ?    33075           
  Partials           ?        0

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update d8598f8...4a83428. Read the comment docs.

@kroening
Copy link
Member Author

kroening commented Jun 5, 2019

Yes, confirmed, cbmc-linux-clang builds with clang 8!

@kroening kroening force-pushed the clang-8-ci branch 2 times, most recently from d8cb021 to c3f2646 Compare June 5, 2019 08:22
Copy link
Contributor

@allredj allredj left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️
This PR failed Diffblue compatibility checks (cbmc commit: 720e783).
Build URL: https://travis-ci.com/diffblue/test-gen/builds/114384475
Status will be re-evaluated on next push.
Common spurious failures include: the cbmc commit has disappeared in the mean time (e.g. in a force-push); the author is not in the list of contributors (e.g. first-time contributors); compatibility was already broken by an earlier merge.

Copy link
Contributor

@allredj allredj left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️
This PR failed Diffblue compatibility checks (cbmc commit: d8cb021).
Build URL: https://travis-ci.com/diffblue/test-gen/builds/114386110
Status will be re-evaluated on next push.
Common spurious failures include: the cbmc commit has disappeared in the mean time (e.g. in a force-push); the author is not in the list of contributors (e.g. first-time contributors); compatibility was already broken by an earlier merge.

Copy link
Contributor

@allredj allredj left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

✔️
Passed Diffblue compatibility checks (cbmc commit: c3f2646).
Build URL: https://travis-ci.com/diffblue/test-gen/builds/114388107

Daniel Kroening added 2 commits June 5, 2019 16:58
This is to catch problems as in #4744.
The default constructor cannot exist; marking it as 'delete' re-enables
compilation with clang.
Copy link
Contributor

@allredj allredj left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

✔️
Passed Diffblue compatibility checks (cbmc commit: f4451b5).
Build URL: https://travis-ci.com/diffblue/test-gen/builds/114459416

Copy link
Member

@peterschrammel peterschrammel left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

CI passed

@peterschrammel peterschrammel merged commit bf5f7f7 into develop Jun 5, 2019
@peterschrammel peterschrammel deleted the clang-8-ci branch June 5, 2019 17:10
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants