Skip to content

Avoid deprecated symbol_exprt default construction in unit test [blocks: #3768] #4101

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 5, 2019

Conversation

tautschnig
Copy link
Collaborator

We don't care about either the type or the name in this test, so just use
symbol_exprt::typeless(irep_idt()).

  • Each commit message has a non-empty body, explaining why the change was made.
  • n/a Methods or procedures I have added are documented, following the guidelines provided in CODING_STANDARD.md.
  • n/a The feature or user visible behaviour I have added or modified has been documented in the User Guide in doc/cprover-manual/
  • Regression or unit tests are included, or existing tests cover the modified code (in this case I have detailed which ones those are in the commit message).
  • n/a My commit message includes data points confirming performance improvements (if claimed).
  • My PR is restricted to a single feature or bugfix.
  • n/a White-space or formatting changes outside the feature-related changed lines are in commits of their own.

We don't care about either the type or the name in this test, so just use
symbol_exprt::typeless(irep_idt()).
Copy link
Contributor

@allredj allredj left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

✔️
Passed Diffblue compatibility checks (cbmc commit: 2df4578).
Build URL: https://travis-ci.com/diffblue/test-gen/builds/99837013

@tautschnig tautschnig merged commit f9c0f33 into diffblue:develop Feb 5, 2019
@tautschnig tautschnig deleted the deprecation-symbol_exprt branch February 5, 2019 20:58
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants