Skip to content

use new goto_programt::instructiont API #4088

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 5, 2019

Conversation

kroening
Copy link
Member

@kroening kroening commented Feb 5, 2019

This increases type safety when accessing or construcing instructions of
goto programs.

  • Each commit message has a non-empty body, explaining why the change was made.
  • n/a Methods or procedures I have added are documented, following the guidelines provided in CODING_STANDARD.md.
  • n/a The feature or user visible behaviour I have added or modified has been documented in the User Guide in doc/cprover-manual/
  • Regression or unit tests are included, or existing tests cover the modified code (in this case I have detailed which ones those are in the commit message).
  • n/a My commit message includes data points confirming performance improvements (if claimed).
  • My PR is restricted to a single feature or bugfix.
  • n/a White-space or formatting changes outside the feature-related changed lines are in commits of their own.

Copy link
Collaborator

@tautschnig tautschnig left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This does quite a lot a the same time, including changing the interface. Either the bug noted below or something else is causing CI to fail. Reviewing would be much easier if each commit did one thing.

@@ -288,8 +288,7 @@ void cfg_baset<T, P, I>::compute_edges_function_call(
goto_programt::const_targett next_PC,
entryt &entry)
{
const exprt &function=
to_code_function_call(instruction.code).function();
const exprt &function = instruction.get_function_call();
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is missing a .function();

This increases type safety when accessing or construcing instructions of
goto programs.
@kroening kroening force-pushed the goto_programt_code_cleanup branch from f138963 to c56dbfd Compare February 5, 2019 16:35
Copy link
Contributor

@allredj allredj left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

✔️
Passed Diffblue compatibility checks (cbmc commit: c56dbfd).
Build URL: https://travis-ci.com/diffblue/test-gen/builds/99818780

@tautschnig tautschnig merged commit be87973 into develop Feb 5, 2019
@tautschnig tautschnig deleted the goto_programt_code_cleanup branch February 5, 2019 21:28
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants