Skip to content

[range.split.inner] Clarify paragraph 1 #4545

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Mar 16, 2021

Conversation

CaseyCarter
Copy link
Contributor

... to avoid confusion about what it means for a name that is not present to denote a type.

... to avoid confusion about what it means for a name that is not present to denote a type.
@jensmaurer
Copy link
Member

@jwakely , are you ok with this change?

@jensmaurer jensmaurer requested a review from jwakely March 12, 2021 23:27
@CaseyCarter CaseyCarter requested a review from jwakely March 16, 2021 16:49
Copy link
Member

@jwakely jwakely left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Approved, with @JohelEGP's suggestion for \exposid{Base}

@jensmaurer
Copy link
Member

@CaseyCarter , I think we need a small update here.

Markup _`Base`_ correctly.

Co-authored-by: Johel Ernesto Guerrero Peña <[email protected]>
@CaseyCarter
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks @JohelEGP - applied.

@jensmaurer jensmaurer merged commit 44e3c7f into cplusplus:master Mar 16, 2021
@CaseyCarter CaseyCarter deleted the split_inner branch March 16, 2021 22:09
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants