-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 832
AM Metric: Add tenant label to valid/invalid configs #2960
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
gouthamve
merged 5 commits into
cortexproject:master
from
gotjosh:invalid-configs-metrics
Aug 4, 2020
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
5 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
979f911
AM Metric: Add tenant label to valid/invalid configs
gotjosh 6896639
Remove the metrics when we have no active config
gotjosh a72a5e1
These metrics no longer get initialised on starting up the component
gotjosh c5cc415
Address review feedback
gotjosh 5dd75f7
s/alertmanager_invalid_config/alertmanager_config_invalid
gotjosh File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I solved the CI failure using a quick hack, but I dislike
Sleep
is tests as it a general source of flaky tests. The problem here is the metric does not get initially registered (given it is per tenant) until much later.A solution I can see would be to create a new method (or argument to
WaitSumMetrics
) that waits for a metric to appear instead of bailing out if we don't see the metric on the initial metrics page load. As I can see this being useful in other areas.Please let me know and I'll be happy to make the change.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Let's work on it in a separate PR. Could you open an issue, please? I have this pending PR #2522 which could be used as a baseline to add a functional option to enable the logic you suggest.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks marco, filed in #2975