Fixing up a bunch of reference; move a86 reference to own chapter. #192
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
There were a bunch of undefined tags because requiring a86 for-label wasn't actually resolving things correctly, so requiring a86/ast etc. for label fixes that. The a86 reference document has been pulled out to a "chapter" level in the notes. Replaced some uses of the undocumented `Plus` constructor with @.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There were a bunch of undefined tags because requiring a86 for-label wasn't actually resolving things correctly, so requiring a86/ast etc. for label fixes that.
The a86 reference document has been pulled out to a "chapter" level in the notes.
Replaced some uses of the undocumented
Plusconstructor with @.